Anyways, enough ranting. I'm hear today to share some more information about the hydrogen generator and Brown's Gas. While many of you have already read the Water4Gas-Gas Buddy or Gas Scam? article and my newest Find Cheap Gas article, there is plenty of other things to cover besides the IRS and spiral electrodes. So how about today we learn the Brown's gas truth. Most of you probably have no idea what I'm talking about which is the whole reason this is being written.
Brown's Gas Truth Heads Back to the 70s'
Long before anyone ever heard of a hydrogen generator there was a man by the name of Yull Brown from Sydney, Australia who knew all about it. In 1977 he refused an offer from an extremely large oil company in the United States to buy his invention of using water for fuel. Even more astonishing was the fact that this was only one of many offers he received for his new innovation. However the technology was based off of cutting and welding torches in the beginning stages back then, but car usage was soon to follow.
Brown's gas innovation continued to stay in his hands even after his company invested over $650,000 on the project. One of the biggest problems he didn't want to happen was that others had come up with similiar inventions, but they basically disappeared off the face of the earth after they sold their rights away. A stubborn man maybe, but thirty plus years later he looks like a genius. Especially since he felt that American companies were only trying to protect their own interests financially.
Brown's Gas Could Run Your Car on Water in the 80s'
Many people believe that when you learn Brown's gas today it's a new technology implemented into someone elses design. However, in 1988 Imagine Magazine (Are they even around anymore?) writer Paul White wrote about how Brown's gas was more of a laughing stock then a serious invention after seeing the 66 year old fill up his gas tank using a garden hose. Even then people were saying this innovation was impossible according to White's findings.
One thing to understand is even though Brown's gas was a safe invention, there were still problems. Now, I couldn't find exactly what those problems were but as I continue to research I hope to come across it at some point. The article leaves you wondering if he had personal or financial problems, or did it have to do with the invention of. If you don't know what Brown's gas derives from it's simply that he found a way to electricity to split water into both hydrogen and oxygen or better known today as Oxyhydrogen. This happens when an electrolyzer is used.
After complete humiliation he was determined to come back with more fire and that's exactly what he did. Long story short so we can move onto some other elements is that Brown's gas was eventually turned into a water generator. It was used by the Chinese Military and eventually thirty of them were given to Mr. Brown in the mid 90s for resale.
If We Just Would Have Wanted To Learn Brown's Gas 20 Years Ago
You have to wonder if we would be in the oil fight of our lives today. One thing to understand about Brown's gas and his technology is that is was based on using ionic hydrogen. This can be safely integrated into a proper mixture with oxygen leaving you with a safe solution that alleviates higher potencies as opposed to hydrogen. Seriously, I could continue to write paragraph after paragraph, but it would probably bore you to tears.
Listen, in February of 1978 the Hansard of the New South Wales Legislative in Australia reported that Yull Brown drove 1,000 miles on a gallon of water. Hard to believe? Maybe, but why? The hydrogen generator has been around for thirty plus years. So before you're so quick to disregard Brown's gas and things we see today like the Water4Gas system, you might take another look. I mean he had valid points back in the 70s.
The best has to be about America trying to protect their interests by buying every invention similiar to Dr. Brown's. Now that I definitely believe considering we have had billions of dollars wrapped up in the oil industry for years. So the next time you have to head out to the gas pump just remember this article. Are we really just being pushed away from an innovation that could potentially reshape the world? The decision is up to you, but if you want to learn more their is additional information here.
Published by Michael Grisso
"It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because by that time I was too famous."~Robert Benchley View profile
- "Avent" Versus "Dr Brown's" Baby BottlesSo many people look for the right bottle when their baby is born. After trying them all each person swears by the one they pick. This article will help compare both the Avent bottle and the Dr Brown's baby bottles.
Hydrogen Gas Generator for Your Car!With the rising costs of auto fuel, I decided to try using hydrogen as a means of supplemental power for my car. Here's my story...
Fuel Economy Increases Using Home Made Hydrogen GeneratorI was tired of being held hostage at the gas pump. So, I used my automotive and race car background to develop something I couldn't find anywhere else. - Dr. Brown's Baby BottlesI took her to the Dr. and after discovering that she had acid reflux they put her on some medication and then suggested that I try Dr Brown's bottles.
- What's Next? Solving Our Gas CrisisThis content explains a cost effective way to convert your car into a water hybrid enabling us to by next year find a solution to our gas crisis.
- Review of the Hydrogen Fueled Rocket Kit from ESTS Rockets
- Dr. Brown's Bottles Help Babies with Reflux
- Hybrid Vs. Hydrogen Debate
- Energy Independence: Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Are Not the Answer
- Product Review - Dr. Brown's Bottles
- Avent Bottles Versus Dr. Brown's Bottles
- Avent Bottles Vs Dr. Brown's Bottles




7 Comments
Post a Commentbasics did tell us that the airplane will not fly, can't be done. I do make hydrogen with my car's battery and have doubled my fuel millage, that is a fact.
Every blog has this stuff about it taking more energy to produce hydrogen than hydrogen can produce.
The fact is hydrogen is produced from water in science classes every school day with a 9 volt battery.
The excess energy produced from a car's alternator is enough to produce all the hydrogen a car needs to operate on.
It is time to stop the nay saying and start calibrating our cars for hydrogen.
I have seen it work too many times to not believe that hydrogen is the fuel of the 21st century.
great read, as always :)
I agree with the car manufacturers, but they've already invested so much money to come out with 100% water based vehicles, why would they just throw that away. It's a little hard for them to turn back now with the billions that have been invested and take an alternate route. We also used to be told that our body needed 6-8 glasses of water a day which is no longer relevant. They are out there changing the CPR methods saying we've been doing it wrong for years. At one point in time it was thought to be impossible to put a man on the moon. In the end as our technology increases it allows us to do things we never were able to before. This includes even this system here. Thanks for your comment.
Unfortunately the concept of using water for fuel is flawed. When burning hydrogen the product is water. Turning water into hydrogen by electrolysis or any other means requires more energy then the reverse process. This is due to the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. A separate source of energy must be present for the production of hydrogen. In this case it is the gas that you are burning in your car. Sure oil companies are powerful, but so is the automotive industry, and I am sure they are pretty pissed off with the rising oil prices. Increased oil prices means decreased big car sales (which is their highest profit margin). If this technology worked then the automotive industry would push very very hard to bring this technology out.
Hey this is interesting. Not to mention we have all kinds of oil throughout the US that the government overlooks. Another thing is in this small town the 2 gas stations share the same gas company while the gas at one station is always like .5-8 cents higher then the other one.
Thanks for the interesting article. :)