According to the Times, among the unfilled positions waiting on Senate confirmation are the Secretary of the Army, the Energy undersecretary for nuclear security, assistant secretaries of Defense, Homeland Security, and Labor. Not included in the 229 figure are nominations for U.S. attorneys, marshals, and judges. The confirmation rate for those positions is better (39%), but still not good.
A Pentagon spokesman, Bryan Whitman, is quoted by the Times as expressing concern at the slowness of the process, ""As a nation at war, it is critical that senior leadership positions at the Department of Defense are filled in an expeditious manner. The Senate plays a vital role with regards to the confirmation process, and we will continue to work closely with senators to fill these critical positions."
A former White House official agreed, pointing out that when certain positions are not filled, decisions are delayed until there are people in place. "It really has a crippling effect on the agency. There's no excuse for not getting this done," the former official told the Times.
The Times compared the current rate of confirmation to what happened during the first six months of 1995 when a Democrat was in the White House and the Republicans had just gained control of both houses of Congress. During those six months, out of 188 nominations sent by President Bill Clinton, the Senate confirmed 112 or 60%.
The Times notes that a slow down in confirmations is not unusual as a President approaches the end of the term and members of the opposing party hope that the next President might be from their party with the power to make nominations more in line with their party's goals. The low rate so far this year also "reflects the president's declining political capital of the administration in Congress," according to a statement to the Times by Paul C. Light, a professor at New York University.
Democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh said a slow confirmation rate is likely for the rest of Mr. Bush's days in the White House. "The fact is in a narrowly divided Senate with an unpopular war and just as many unhappy Republicans, nominations will be used as leverage from now to the end of the Bush presidency. It is one of the few ways, if any, that can be used to move the Bush administration," she told the Times.
washingtontimes.com/article/20070702/NATION/107020057/1002
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859656/posts
Published by Bible Doc
I am a (mostly) retired minister. I spent a few years teaching Bible courses in a Christian school. One of my goals is to write. I see Associated Content as a step toward fulfilling that goal. View profile
- The 2006 Senate Elections in the American NortheastAn overview of the 2006 Senate election in the Northeastern states.
- The 2006 Senate Elections in the American NorthwestAn overview of the 2006 Senate elections in the Pacific Northwest.
US Senate: Lt-Gen David Petraeus to Lead in IraqThe US Senate confirmed Lt-Gen David Petraeus as the new commander of troops in Iraq with a unanimous vote of 81-0.
Oklahoma Senate Bill 375 Faces Opposition from HomeschoolersWhen the Oklahoma Senate session starts on Monday, February 5th there will be deep breath coming from the many homeschool families in Oklahoma.
Bob Corker Vs. Harold Ford Jr: Tennessee's Dirty Senate RaceBob Corker is running against Harold Ford Jr. in the Tennessee Senate Race. His tactics, backed if not created by the RNC, include running false ads against Ford and then havin...
- The Day I Met President George W. Bush
- The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005: Still Stalled in the U.S. Senate
- The 2006 Senate Elections in the American Southwest
- US Senate Rejects Plans to Save American Lives
- The 2006 Senate Elections in the American Midwest
- The 2006 Senate Elections in the American Southeast
- A Pox on the Senate
