Machiavelli states however that it is better to be feared, than loved. He is not loved, as stated earlier, yet not feared either. The U.S. is a world superpower, and many small countries are afraid that someday they will be invaded by our armed forces, but it takes more than Bush to send those forces into countries, so they do not fear Bush as a leader.
Bush is a hereditary ruler because his father accomplished many things that he has continued with during his terms in office. The war against Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein were all started with George Bush, Sr. and now George W. carries on with the war. Although Machiavelli says that a hereditary ruler is effective because he already has the respect of his people-this does not apply to Bush. He doesn't have the love from his people that his father did and would be more effective if he were a new ruler. At least then he would be able to start with his own platform and not be living under a shadow of someone politically greater than him.
A "pro" to being a hereditary ruler is the respect of people who are used to being ruled-not used to being free. Bush cannot expect this in the U.S. His citizens demand answers for their occupation in Iraq and do not make it easy for him to maintain his "rule." A "con" to being a hereditary ruler is that accomplishments are acquired by good fortune and the ruler rarely has training or experience. This is very true of Bush, as some believe that he has no experience in conducting a war and little training. I mean, if he can't even read a book right side up, and makes up words all the time, how is he going to acquire accomplishments in the Middle East?
Published by Jonna Windon
I'm a soldier's wife. I have a Bachelors Degree in Political Science, and am a certified paralegal. I don't think I will ever get tired of reading and learning and thinking :) View profile
Plato, Aristotle, and Machiavelli's Concept of a "Ruler"Aristotle's concept of ruler's pros out measure his cons...
George W. Bush is NOT HitlerThe purpose of this article is to fairly challenge the idea that George W. Bush is like Adolf Hitler- How Will History Judge George Bush?George Bush believes History will vindicate his decision to invade Iraq. However, cultural patterns in the Middle East have proven far more complex than the president imagined.
George W. Bush: Bad for Our MilitaryGeorge W. Bush has destroyed thousands of military families and stretched our young soldiers too thin.- Top Ten Reasons George W. Bush Will Go Down as the Greatest President in U.S. Hist...A humorous look at the prospect history will vindicate the presidency of George W. Bush.
- George W. Bush and the Personality Cult
- The New and "Improved" George W. Bush!
- Niccolò Machiavelli, the Prince
- George W. Bush is a Liberal
- A Look at Religion as Interpreted by Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince
- Ideas and Rhetoric of Machiavelli in The Prince
- Religion and Politics in Machiavelli's the Prince
- Bush is not feared by his people.
- Bush is not an effective hereditary ruler.




