California Marijuana Bill Proposes Legalizing Marijuana Tax to Equal $1 a Joint
Responsibility is a Heavy Responsibility!
Whose Idea is the California Marijuana Tax?
The California marijuana tax is the brainchild of Tom Ammiano who believes the State of California to be at a fork in the road, necessitating a batch of progressive - as opposed to traditional - leaders in the California legislature. He reports having spent 30 years as a teacher and also civil rights leader for gay and lesbian rights.
It was on 02-23-09 that Tom Ammiano introduced California Assembly Bill 390, entitled the "Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act." It legalizes pot for those 21 and older, sells commercial growers' licenses at $5,000 a pop, and places a $50 marijuana tax on each ounce of Mary Jane.
California Marijuana Tax Selling Points
Joe Eskenazi from the San Francisco Weekly reports on the press conference held by Ammiano, during which he heavily touted the fiscal sense his proposed marijuana bill would make. This more or less equates Mary Jane with alcohol, making it a taxed narcotic. What is more, because of legalization, the actual cost of the reefer is supposed to go down.
Quoting the chairwoman of the Board of Equalization, Betty Yee, the fiscal impact on the state of California is nothing to spit at: there would be a $1.3 billion influx into the woefully bare coffers of the state, while the tax itself would only translate to about $1 per joint. Another quoted estimate is the 40% increase of marijuana users legalization would create, while at the same time it would empty the jails of the petty offenders nabbed for drug charges.
Seeing that 1/3 of California prison inmates were handed get out of jail free cards by federal judges, some Californians can now be found vigorously nodding their heads in agreement.
Are Taxpayers Buying into the Marijuana Tax Argument?
Polling Report states that a CBS News/New York Times poll finds 41% in favor legalization while 52% oppose legalization of marijuana. The sample size was 1,112 adults. Comparing this to a 2002 CNN/Time poll, which found 34% in favor and 59% opposed, it would appear that public perception of a California marijuana bill is changing.
Responsibility sure is a heavy responsibility -- to paraphrase the indomitable Cheech.
Sources
http://www.tomammiano.com/; http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/ab_390_bill_20090223_introduced.pdf; http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/02/get_up_stand_up_ammiano_introd.php; http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1462677/one_third_of_california_prison_inmates.html?cat=8; http://www.pollingreport.com/drugs.htm
Published by Sylvia Cochran - Featured Contributor in Automotive, Politics, Travel and Lifestyle
Sylvia Cochran works out of sunny Southern California and has been freelance writing -- full-time -- since 2005. SEO-optimized Internet copy includes news analysis, political Op/Ed and parenting as well as a... View profile
- Legalizing Marijuana: Trying to Outweigh the Pros with the Constaking an equal look at both sides of the debate of whether or not marijuana should be legal. Pointing out both the pros and cons to this controversial issue.
- Marijuana as MedicineA look at marijuana and the different ways it is used medicinally
- The Case for Legalizing MarijuanaTells why Marijuana should be legal.
- Should Medical Marijuana Be Legal? Or Should Prohibition Continue?Federal and state legalization of marijuana, for medical use by certified patients, will improve quality of life for thousands of persons suffering from disease and disabilities in the USA.
- An Essay About Gore Vidal's Drugs: A Case for Legalizing MarijuanaAn essay summarizing Gore Vidal's argument
- Congress Can Stop Medical Marijuana
- The Future of Legalizing Marijuana
- America Speaks - Abortion, Same Sex Marriage, and Legalizing Marijuana
- Medical Marijuana
- Should Ohio Law Allow Medical Marijuana Usage?
- $1.8 Million Marijuana Garden Lands Minnesota Man in Jail
- The Future of Medical Use of Marijuana - State Vs. Federal Power





29 Comments
Post a CommentReally Love the statistics that you added to this. Very informative article.
I LOVE YOUR ARTICLE. :) (seriously though it is right on, thanks for writing it.)
PS....
And if we don't tax it It's only the criminals making money. Why would we give up valid tax money for things that are already happening. It's not like the proposal was to smoke in the streets.
We really need the tax revenue. That is all there is to say whether you like it or not.
Just look at studies done in Amsterdam. LESS people use when there is no prohibition. Prohibition always fails!
I don't think it's such a big deal. I don't care about personal choices as long as people don't drive.
itsridiculoustohavesuchaharmfulsubstancemadelegal.
ihave 7 cages 3 plates and 16 screws in my neck and open angle glaucoma from abuse marijuana heped me with all of my medical problems and hot flashes and depression and sleep disorder oklahoma should alow at leaset for medical use so i can get out of some of this pain and slow my eye site loss down and get me of all this meds i take down im currently on 7 shame on people for not at least for pain and eye site loss ok please think about it . i served this country please serve me.
Thank you all for stopping by and for commenting. Questions: if something is federally illegal, how is it possible for a state to a) make it legal and b) collect taxes on it without causing participants to self-incriminate in participation in a federal crime?