California Passes New Anti-Paparazzi Law
Under New Anti-Paparazzi Law Photographers Can Be Fined for Invasion of Privacy
This was one of the newest bills that Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law on Sunday, and will not just end at targeting photographers that take photos which invade the privacy of celebrities. This bill is also going to target any media outlet that decides to purchase or distribute these pictures. This helps to remove one of the big ways that these photographers can make money off of less than savory pictures, and by aiming the legislation at the media outlets, it will make them much less likely to seek out pictures like this. This stuff has become big business unfortunately, and it will be a big move for unlawful pictures to be kept out of the news.
This is not to say that all celebrity photographers cross the line when it comes to taking pictures. Actually the opposite is probably true, where many photographers just make sure to be on the scene when a movie is premiering or a celebrity event is taking place. It is just the few bad apples that do cross the line that are drawing negative attention to the celebrity photograph business as a whole. Now the next question is going to be whether this law gets enforced, and who the first judge will be that sides with a celebrity before something going through an extended and expensive trial for the state.
The other thing to keep in mind about celebrity photographs, as mentioned in a CNN article I linked below, is that many times the celebrities are selling the personal photographs themselves. When a popular celebrity is about to have a baby, there is often the chance to sell those photographs for a lot of money up front, which the magazine pays to have exclusive publishing rights to the photos. I know one thing about this new law, and that is that Britney Spears and several other celebrities are going to be extremely excited to hear about it passing. The first real anti-paparazzi law in a while could be groundbreaking, but first it has to be enforced. The law goes into effect in January, and at that point fines of up to $50,000 can be levied against offenders. Will it work?
Source: CNN Article
Published by Ryan Christopher DeVault - Featured Contributor in Sports
Born in Seattle, Washington, I am a 31 year old college graduate working in the field of Education and Research. I am also a professional freelance writer and news content provider. I can be reached at... View profile
- Britney Spears in Strobes Flash Britney Spears is the tabloid publishers delight as her increasingly erratic behavior is very visual media oriented making the convergence between print and Web 2.0 seamless.
- Britney Spears as a Role Model Britney Spears has been on the spotlight both good and bad, first as being a young singer to get a star on the hall of fame and more recently of having lost custody of her children, shaving her head and doing crazy th...
- Britney Spears Naked - Why is it Such a Popular Google Search? Why do people search for Britney Spears crotch, Britney Spears naked, and all the Britney Spears naked searches in between?
- Top Ten Reasons Britney Spears Should Hire a Driver When I wrote Top Ten Reasons Britney Spears Should Wear Panties last year I was taking the matter lightly. This article, however, is no laughing matter
- Britney Spears Makes Comback at VMAs Britney Spears is working to reinvent herself at this year's VMAs. There were many changes we can see with Britney.
- Britney Spears Topless Pictures Circulating on Web
- California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Wants to "Terminate" Some of State's Wel...
- Arnold Schwarzenegger Masks for Halloween Night on October 31
- Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Barak Obama and Global Warming
- Arnold Schwarzenegger and Rudy Giuliani Endorse John McCain
- Republican Candidate John McCain Receives Key Endorsements from Both Arnold Schwar...
- Christmas Gift Ideas for Britney Spears Fans
|
|
4 Comments
Post a CommentGood the damage that has been caused by these picture takers can be horrible. I never take a photo of someone who has not signed a release for me. Not a good thing to try and get nasty or silly pictures just for the embarrassment of the subject.
I don't understand this law. If celebrities are out in public, they can be legally photographed, just like another other person in a public place. Will the law only protect them inside their own homes? I think further explanation of the details of the law is necessary here.
When they become celebreties, they should expect the attention. However, invading their privacy goes too far.
thanks!! i am very much in favor of this.