The war against terrorism is firstly riddled with hypocrisy. It has become acceptable to fight a war on foreign soil for terrorist acts committed against us, without even considering that actions we take in that war could constitute terrorism on our part, and result in further backlash. The attitude has been established, that if they do it us, it's wrong. Evil. Terrorism. But if we do it to them, it's OK. Morally right. Acceptable. By no means is this the case. This is both wrong in the sense that it's not justifiable, and that it creates more problems than it solves.
By engaging in or supporting terrorism ourselves, we create martyrs in countries such as Iraq and Palestine. Sure, we may call it "counter" terrorism, but to the victims of our "counter" aggression, our actions constitute terrorism in its purest form, blatant and direct. When we analyse the results of this martyrdom in Iraq and Palestine, we see that not only are these martyrs made heroes by their countrymen, but they are replaced by new and more ruthless insurgents, and the cycle continues.
So by current means of rooting out and destroying insurgency in Iraq, sponsoring Israeli occupation of Palestine, or locking up thousands of suspected terrorists in Guantanamo Bay, we are as much a contributor to the continuance of the war against terror than those we are fighting against, and considering the men we kill are only going to be replaced by worse, our methods can lead to no victory, even if it takes John McCain's one hundred year promise.
The further problems with fighting against Islamic extremists such as Al-Qaeda is that they wear no identifiable uniform, they are an occupied people, and they hold no limits to the actions they are willing to take to kill western soldiers. This kind of mindset is going to exist no matter how long we fight this war, no matter how many young martyrs we make. It's time for a change in tact with regard to the war against terror, because under the status quo, we are simply magnifying every spectrum of the problem we're meant to be fighting against.
Published by Christopher Smith
- Is America Losing the War on Terror? Bush and Co. claim the war on terror is being won and that leaving Iraq would bring terrorists to your back door. Apparently, they are the only people in Washington who believe these things.
-
What the Democrats Don't Understand About the War on Terror
By criticizing President Bush over the hunt for Bin Laden, and by calling for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the Democrats demonstrate that they don't understand the purpos...
- Cheney is Afraid Some Court Will Want to Try Him as a War Criminal. We have Cheney in every venue arguing that the Obama administration isn't aware that the US is in a war against terrorism. The administration that Cheney was so indispensible in didn't agree with Cheney's radical view...
- Bush vs. Iraq: How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights No group has suffered more from Bush's "war on terror" than the people of Iraq. Despite worldwide protests, countless Iraqi civilians have been killed, injured, unlawfully detained, and/or tortured in the US-led war o...
- Could the War in Afghanistan Be Won with Poppy? The illegal drug trade in Afghanistan fuels the Taliban immensly. A new approach to break the Taliban's cashflow would be legalising poppy cultivation in order to provide cheap painkillers for developing countries.
- The War on Terror: A Tragedy of Errors - Why It's Time to Cut Our Losses and Run
- Why We Must Win the War on Terror
- War on Terror
- War on Terror Vs. War in Iraq
- The War on Terror: Protesting the Liberation of Iraq
- Rudy Giuliani Riding the War on Terror
- Murder Rates and Violent Crimes in America Vs. The War on Terror and Terrorist Acts!
|
|