When analyzing the effects of deforestation, researchers found that people received $5 per ton of carbon released during deforestation. Sometimes then got less than $1 per ton of carbon. Areas that were rich in peat recouped only 10 to 20 cents a ton for carbon released. However, European nations have been paying about $35 for a one ton carbon reduction, indicating that the forests can be easily preserved with carbon credits.
"Deforestation is almost always driven by a rational response to what the market values and for some time now, it has just made more financial sense to many people in forested areas to cut down the trees," said Brent Swallow, leader of the study and Global Coordinator of the Partnership for Tropical Forest Margins. "What we discovered is that returns for deforestation are generally so paltry that if farmers and other land users were rewarded for the carbon stored in their trees and forests, it is highly likely that a large amount of deforestation and carbon emissions would be prevented."
Not only could deforestation be prevented, but certain practices could also be encouraged that help absorb carbon. Agroforestry is a viable option, which can both increase the incomes of the people employing these practices as well as absorbing more carbon.
However, the researchers acknowledge that although the solution in theory is simple, allowing participation in carbon markets by nations with large tropical forests could cause problems. The researchers contend that the risk is worth the possible reward.
"We understand that allowing people in forested regions of developing countries to participate in carbon markets presents major challenges, but it's naive to think that conservation is going to occur absent a market incentive," said Meine van Noordwijk, Southeast Asia Regional Coordinator of the World Agroforestry Centre (known by its acronym ICRAF). "Everyone has a stake in finding a way to make it work because it's hard to see how any global effort to combat climate change will succeed if it ignores a major source of the problem. Source:
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, "Report finds deforestation offers very little money compared to potential financial benefits", Eurekalert
Published by Kay Jones
I'm a student. View profile
- Functionallized Carbon Nanotubes: A Thousand and One UsesBy adding molecules to carbon nanotubes new functionality is created. More than 1000 new molecules involving carbon nanotubes have been created.
- Heat Sinks: Hot Market for Cool Carbon NanotubesHeat sinks prevent microprocessors from overheating and are used in billions of devices including cellphones, computers, CD and DVD players as well as many other electronic devices. Researchers found carbon nanotubes...
Need for Speed Carbon Review2006's Need for Speed Carbon has many improvements, here we'll see what they are.- Burning Man Gets Help Offsetting His Carbon FootprintEvery year over 40,000 attendees of Burning Man travel to a remote desert playa in Nevada to celebrate. This uses a lot of energy and leaves an ugly carbon footprint. What to do? This year it's Cooling Man to the r...
- Global Warming and Carbon Emission-Trading Schemes: Guilty by ExistenceThis paper touches on the green House Gases schemes that seem to be a big world topic these days. It also looks at what the real motives are behind the so called "global warming issues" and the so called "fixes".
- Carbon Footprints: What You Should Know About Greenhouse Emissions
- Ecological Farming Given a Helping Hand by Carbon Credits
- Carbon Tax or Cap-and-Trade?
- Of Catholic Indulgence and Carbon Offsets
- Al Gore's Proposal for a Carbon Tax to Replace Payroll Tax
- Being Carbon Neutral
- Carbon Credit
