Carrie Prejean Sex Tape: Anticipation Over Prejean Tapes Builds, Vivid Wants to Buy

Carrie Prejean Sex Tapes Could End Up on Vivid.Com

Meg G.
Carrie Prejean sex tapes have been the talk of the Internet for a week now. The Prejean tapes are so hot, that Vivid Entertainment wants a piece of the action. According to Gather.com, Vivid wants to put the Carrie Prejean sex tapes on Vivid.com in the same area as the Kim Kardashian sex tapes and the Shauna Sands video.

Whether or not Prejean will accept the company's gracious offer to make her millions has not been determined. If she does accept the offer, she could make much, much more money than she ever could have won through her Miss USA lawsuit. We all know that something about the sex tape inspired Prejean to make a hasty settlement, walking away with virtually nothing.

Vivid Entertainment posting the videos on their site also means that the millions of people searching for Carrie Prejean sex tapes will be able to do so without worrying that they will receive a computer virus. However, the tapes won't be free - that's how Vivid makes their money.

Should Carrie Prejean accept the offer? Although she likes to portray herself as an honest and conservative individual, her credibility is all but shattered. She lied about her age when she made the tapes, the number of tapes she made, and has made a jerk out of herself on national television. It's not like she's going to lose a lot of fame or credibility by selling the tapes.

Look at Kim Kardashian. Although the sex tapes marked a dark point in the famous socialite's life, she's still bounced back. People don't always see the sex tape when they look at her - they likely see her reality TV show "Keeping up with the Kardashians."

I have a feeling that we have only scratched the surface of Carrie Prejean's fame. First comes the Miss California scandal, then comes the sex tapes and scandal, and to follow we are likely to see a reality show and an Oprah interview. Let's just hope that the Oprah interview goes a lot better than the slaughtered Larry King interview!

However, if Carrie Prejean feels some moral obligation to protect whatever is left of her morality, she may not accept the deal. What is known, however, is the video is hot and would make her a lot of money. The deal could also win her a lot more fans and fame. We all know she's a sucker for both!

Sources:

Gather.com http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977905264

Published by Meg G.

Meg G. is a financial professional. During her previous life, she ran a contracting business with her husband. Now, she likes to share late breaking news, financial advice, and do-it-yourself tips with her d...   View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • DEL PIERO HIGH 10/6/2010

    SHE IS DO HOTT .. I just saw her sex video for free online at www.xrude.net

  • RHSimard 11/23/2009

    (Just a little more to complete the last post which was cut off.)

    "(How many others wouldn't be in trouble if they were found out, I wonder; it's no excuse. but I do wonder.)"

    The rest of the questions would have been better answered, none of your damn business. When one asks a question one has no right to ask, neither has one the right to a truthful answer. A falsehood, silence, brush-off, or the truth if the one asks chooses, are right and proper. In particular, asking the boyfriend to say she was 17 (and if, as is not proven, she wasn't) was perfectly right; nobody on earth has the right to know different.

    Why isn't he getting heat, by the way? What terrible betrayal? Nobody seems to care.

  • RHSimard 11/23/2009

    Let's back up from the noise a moment.

    1. The tape: The problem of teen girls "sexting" (for those not yet aware, it's sending sexy photos, often nudes, or similar to boyfriends) is a growing problem. Carrie's case is little different. It's years in the past (the boyfriend says she was 20; she's 22 now) it was unwise, but by Christian morality, it's only that she was unmarried. A wife doing the same thing for a husband wouldn't be any problem.

    The photos are as mild a case of partial nudity as you can get, and were arranged by Keith Lewis anyway.

    I also think she would be one of the best choices for Christian groups to invite to counsel young girls. Who better to advise against a dangerous practice than one who has been so spectacularly burned by it?

    The "lies:"

    She was false when she signed a contract with a morals clause (in this case, archaic, intrusive and sexist, IMO) she was not conforming to. (How many others wouldn't be in trouble if they were found out, I w

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.