Celebrity Tax Evasion: What Did Wesley Snipes Do and What Happens Now?
If Charges Stick, Wesley Snipes May Recapture His Role as a Fugitive from Justice
An eight-count indictment was filed against Wesley Snipes on charges of failing to file tax returns and filing false amended returns. The indictment includes charges against two Florida men, Eddie Kahn and Douglas Rosile Sr., who assisted him in the alleged tax fraud. The movie actor who once played the role of a fugitive from justice may now be one himself, as his whereabouts are unknown. If Snipes knows he is under indictment and has deliberately vanished, his disappearance could add five additional years tacked onto his possible sentence.
The indictment includes six charges of failing to file income tax returns from 1999 to 2004, each of which could result in one year in prison. Plus after filing returns for 1996 and 1997 and paying the $12 million in taxes due, he later amended the returns, asserting that his income should have been reported as zero and that he was due refunds. The IRS issued the refunds, and then took a closer look at Snipes' amended returns. After determining that the actor's claims of zero income were bogus, they notified Snipes that he must repay the $12 million. Snipes refused, answering that because his last several movies went straight to video, he had no money.
Why Did Snipes Claim He Was Entitled to Pay No Taxes on Millions of Dollar of Income?
With the help of tax preparer Douglas Rosile Sr. and Eddie Ray Kahn, founder of American Rights Litigators, Snipes used what is known as the Section 861 Argument. According to the IRS, this is an old chestnut, tried by numerous taxpayers. It is based on the false assertion that only income that is earned from foreign sources is subject to federal taxes. Since Snipes earned his mega millions in the United States, his amended tax returns showed zero taxable income.
The Section 861 defense is a favorite of tax protestors. In fact, it appear on the IRS Dirty Dozen list of most common tax scams (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=136337,00.html). But Sections 861-865 of Title 26 of the tax law are intended to help taxpayers determine whether or not income from foreign sources is taxable. What these sections do not do, is render income earned within the United States nontaxable. Still, that has not stopped tax protestors like Snipes from trying it.
A Little History About Co-Defendants, Eddie Kahn and Douglas Rosile
Kahn is the founder of American Rights Litigators (ARL) and its successor, Guiding Light of God Ministries (GLGM). According to the indictment ( http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/tax/ussnipes101206ind.html) GLGM claims to be a non-profit "Christian ministry and organization established to assist men and women in their pursuit of truth and freedom as Americans." In reality, the indictment says, the ARL and the GLGM were for-profit commercial pursuits that sold fraudulent tax schemes to the public that sought to interfere with the government's tax revenue laws. ARL charged clients a fee for tax preparation, half of which was paid to Rosile as the tax preparer. And any tax refund that resulted from fraudulent tax returns generated a 20 percent fee for ARL, half of which was paid to Rosile.
Rosile is a former CPA who practiced accounting after his licenses in Florida and Ohio were revoked. He is currently being sued by the Justice Department for allegedly filing bogus tax refunds for clients in 32 states, totaling more than $36 million. The suit is still pending.
U.S. Attorney Paul I. Perez reports that Rosile is currently in custody in Ocala, Florida, and Eddie Kahn is believed to be out of the country. In a news conference regarding the Snipes case, Perez said, "It's a conspiracy against the IRS, basically to harass the IRS, from doing its lawful job in terms of collection of taxes."
Celebrities and Other Rich People and the IRS
You probably remember that, not long ago, Willie Nelson was under IRS scrutiny for investing in abusive tax shelters. The shelters promised $10 in deductions for every $1 invested. Sound too good to be true? It was. Instead of the tax savings what Willie got was a tax bill for over $16 million. To pay up he had to allow the IRS to sell his ranch and other assets, and sign over a royalty interest in his album "Who'll Buy My Memories?" In the end, a new IRS policy that encourages settlement agreements allowed Willie Nelson to agree to pay $9 million additional taxes over five years, for a total of $12.6 million instead of the original $16 million.
You may also remember when Leona Helmsley (aka "The Queen of Mean") was sent to prison for 18 months for tax evasion and mail fraud. She was the widow of real estate tycoon Harry Helmsley and at that time, one of the richest women in the country. But according to her housekeeper, Helmsley's tax philosophy was summed up by saying "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes." Eighteen months in prison may have caused her to adjust her thinking, though if the gossip sheets are accurate, she's still the Queen of Mean.
More importantly though, Helmsley was wrong. In spite of the fact that Americans constantly complain that the rich pay little or no taxes, the opposite is true (though there are notorious exceptions, like Nelson and Helmsley and possibly Snipes). Year after year, statistics prove that almost all federal income tax revenue collected is paid by the top earners. In fact, the rich pay more now than they did under the previous administration.
The Department of Treasury estimates that for 2006:
- The top one percent of income and wage earners (those making nearly $408,000 annually) will pay about 23 percent of all federal tax.
- The top 5 percent (earning more than $169,500) will pay about 42 percent of the total federal tax collected.
- The top 10 percent (over $123,700) will pay 54.5 percent.
- And the bottom 50 percent (less than $36,700) will pay about 6 percent of the total revenue.
- But wait... the last 6 percent figure is misleading. Because many who make less than $30,000 pay nothing because they qualify for refundable credits like the Earned Income Credit. And still others who had nothing withheld all year long still get large Earned Income Credit refunds.
Some people hear these facts and refuse to believe them, mainly because they feel the pinch in their paychecks. But in many cases they are forgetting that much of that pinch is Social Security, not federal tax. They also do not consider the fact that, if they end up with a refund, they get much or all of that back.
Where Do Your Sympathies Lie?
It's an odd fact of life in America...many people are livid when they hear that a rich business person, like Leona Helmsley has cheated on his or her taxes yet they are willing and eager to give a free pass to rich celebrities like Wesley Snipes and Willie Nelson who do the same thing. But rich is rich and however their money was made, in business or in movies, or even illegally, the tax bill still has to be paid. And in spite of the popular myth that the wealthy don't pay taxes, statistics prove that most of them do. They pay their share and their share is generally much more than that of the middle class. Those who don't, may eventually face not only the Tax Man, but also penalties and prison.
What do you think?
Published by Rond Drew
Former accountant, taught college-level business, and owned and operated a small tax practice. View profile
- Filing Tax Returns Online - a Comprehensive Guide to ServicesThe IRS provides information regarding Income Tax Returns, but this article will list the benefits and features of various online filing sites. Information will include pricing, availability of assistance, and estimat...
- TaxAct Tax Returns Made EasyFast affordable way to prepare tax returns using the TaxACT software available both online and with a download option.
- TurboTax Puts the EZ Back into Tax ReturnsA review of TurboTax and all that makes tax preparation as easy as apple pie. Quit pulling your hair out over income tax preparation. TurboTax eliminates the grief associated with the filing process.
- Girls Gone Wild Founder Nailed for Tax EvasionJoe Francis, the founder of the Girls Gone Wild DVD series, has been nailed for federal tax evasion. Uncle Sam is accusing Francis of claiming $20 million in false business expenses.
- Prepare Your Own Income Tax ReturnsPrepare your income tax returns at home for free or purchase software to avoid the higher cost of an accountant.
- Was Race a Factor in the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion Conviction?
- Wesley Snipes Sentenced to Three Years for Tax Offenses
- Wesley Snipes and Tax Evasion Problems
- Filing Your Tax Returns in Cortland, New York
- Top 10 AC News Articles of 2006
- Wesley Snipes and Tax Fraud: Will the Daywalker Spend Time in Jail?
- Wesley Snipes Tax Woes May Get Him 16 Years in Prison



26 Comments
Post a CommentReally
Constitutional Experts
Pay Your taxes Yeah in the 20's We he people decided to have Income Tax - WOW like thats News
So now a bunch of Wackos decide Oh No We Didn't
How come it's always the ones who shout about liberty who don't want to pay their taxes?
I read the BS in the text about how The folk who MAKE UNDER 30K do not pay any federal tax - Yeah I hope not. Under 30k What do they live on at all?
Oh and how the Rich pay all the Tax Well let's use the numbers in the text 125 pays 55% that leaves 55K after tax But remember thats not 125k gross income thats adj gross income. So it more likely the guys making 250k and paying tax on the 125k he couldn't shelter Please the rich are getting much richer and the Poor are dieing from the debt of buying food heat and a roof over their heads.
Shut Up Tax your taxes and Roll back the Reagan Tax Cuts and put this country back on Solid Ground
You Spencer - So, would you consider yourself a neo-jeffersonian, or more aptly stated what many refer to as the "classical Liberal"? You see, I do understand the difference bewteen what liberal, and liberalism in today's world versus the actual origin of the word liberal.
Perhaps you should check into the works of Carla Howell. She can be found at the following: http://www.smallgovernmentact.org/Directions_to_FS.htm
"disagreement is normal"--fair enough Gina.
One more thing Paul. I'm getting tired of this conversation and I have articles to write for my real employer. If we could both keep in mind that disagreement is normal and may or may not mean that one of is wrong or not paying attention. Please don't assume that reaching different conclusions means I don't pay attention. I'd lose my job in a flash if I wasn't on top of the issues.
As for saying you were a kid, I am going by your picture, which is all I have to go by, and compared to me, you look very young. Could just be that I'm very old!
Wow...Paul. We cannot seem to get on the same page. My comments weren't meant to be condescending. But your comments... telling me to pay attention to what's going on around me? Now that is condescending. Paul... two people can pay attention and come to different conclusions. And clearly we have. Don't assume that because I do not agree with you I've got my head stuck in a hole. I write for a Washington DC business publication every single day... not a political publication, but a business publication, from an accounting standpoint. I can't afford to not pay attention to what's going on around me. I may not trust the same sources you trust and get your information from, and I expect that you won't trust the sources I trust. That's where our different conclusions come from... that and different backgrounds. I find it very troubling when people say that if we reach different conclusions, one of us is not paying attention. That's a ridiculous assertion. As for saying you are a kid,
Please don't condescend Gina--I am not a "kid" and I am not "angry at the world"--that implies that I am being irrational. Anything I am outraged about deserves outrage. If you are being objective, and paying attention to whats happening all around you, then you might know what I am talking about.
Paul Angelo: You are funny. You seem like a nice kid who means well.I've read your comments before on this and other articles and I hope you are not really as angry at the world as you seem.
Gina, you are just being silly. Angelfire first said "Spencer benedict sounds very liberal to me", and then two sentences later said, "He is anti-tax as in Pro tax evasion". Anyone can see that he was insinuating that being "pro-tax evasion" is a liberal trait. But honestly, this whole conversation is useless and Benedict has already cleared the air calling himself a libertarian. So it looks like I was right on that point, which was my only point by the way.
http://riddlesolved.blogspot.com/
Here is some great information for starters - many links to relevent pages.