But, as I grew older I started to look at it from a different perspective... Who were these "people of power" to say what was or wasn't inappropriate in a work of art? Who were they to say what you couldn't see?
Books are censored very often, because authors look at their work as a personal craft, something that they put themselves into. So, naturally, they are unconcerned with censoring their own minds. However, for some reason, people don't look at it as a work of art, or a piece of a person's soul. They look at it simply as a collection of words that are filed into two categories, appropriate or inappropriate.
Now, while I don't agree that just anything should be out there, I believe that the decision of what content is viewed should belong to the artist and the audience. I also believe that the priorities of censorship are vastly skewed. While, a man being violently murdered can be seen on network television, they will still censor out a word. I have never fully understood this. What gives a word with no literal meaning more power than the death of a human being? Well, to be perfectly honest, neither of those have power until someone gives them power, and if you block somebody from seeing it because you believe that it has the ability to harm people mentally or emotionally, then you give it power. So, in summation, it would seem that the censors have given power to the very thing they sought to protect us from.
I am not proposing that we entirely abolish censorship. I am just saying that censorship has skewed priorities, and is taken too far in situations that do not call for it. My proposition is that censorship needs to be revamped, realigned, reconstituted, and rethought. I agree that there are things young people shouldn't see... and now that I have spent some time on the internet, I have realized that there are some things no one should see.
All these articles you read present you with information on a topic, but you don't have to stop there. You do have the ability to change things. You can change things with the way that you vote, or you can take action and write to someone in power, you can petition, you can rally. You have real power, and if this hasn't sparked your interest then there are causes far more noble to take up than censorship. You can make a difference, you just have to be willing to step out of the crowd and make yourself heard. It's a scary prospect, but it's the right thing to do.
Published by Mat Stevens
Born and resides in Ohio, currently attending college to earn a degree in creative writing. View profile
Global Warming/Climate Change Not Just for Democrats AnymoreGeorge W. Bush talked about reducing our dependence on foreign oil...again, this time with a twist. He talke about "climate change" in a State of the Union Address for the first...
Create a Treat Fund with Spare Change I bet you have spare change in your pockets, in your purse. Well spare change over time can add up to a lot of money. Why not create a little treat fund to buy yourself somethin...
Should the United States Practice Compulsory Voting?When only 64% of Americans show up to vote for the President, is it fair to say that those who did not vote have no right to complain? Countries like Australia use compulsory vo...- Censorship: The Negative Effects Parents Don't Know AboutThis paper discusses censorship in literature used in high school curriculum's and how it affects students negatively.
- Application of Change Models
- You Can't Change Your Life Today
- Change Management Theories
- Change from Fear to Focus in Your Life - Today
- Tweak Versus Major Change
- Power to Change
- How to Make a Change Purse




3 Comments
Post a CommentI agree strongly
I agree strongly
Mat...you are so right about the unending violence that goes unchecked, yet a single word can be controversial! Go figure! This is a thoughful and wonderfully written article!