Children's Bill of Rights

It's Time We Thought About Their Needs

Jamie K. Wilson
My husband was appalled this morning when he found out a local charity was raising funds toward filled backpacks for homeless children. It wasn't the backpacks he took issue with, but the fact that these children, recipients of brand-new backpacks full of great school stuff, were left homeless with their parents instead of being placed in foster care, where they would at least have roofs over their heads and be protected in a home.

I laughed at him a little - but I also agreed with him. For the last thirty years, the focus has been on keeping the family intact, no matter how difficult that may be for the family. There seems to be a romantic notion that if a child is with his or her parent(s), everything else is secondary. This is simply not true, as decades of generational welfare and dysfunction should have taught us all by now.

Children are often better off without abusive parents, addicted parents, or absent parents. Children of absentee parents often wait years before parental rights are terminated involuntarily, resulting in their dependence on the foster system because they've outgrown the prime ages of adoption. Children are left with abusive parents by a dysfunctional system, while children in perfectly functioning families are monitored because the parents are more cooperative. Babies are born addicted, and then turned over to mothers who have shown by their behavior that they are unable to care for themselves, much less an infant.

This needs to stop, but not in a piecemeal fashion, and not in a way that overly burdens the government. We need a coherent, universal, federal children's bill of rights. With a bill of rights just for children, legislation would have a true guideline for when to interfere with the parental bond, and when to just leave things alone, and an objective way to judge when social structures like schools and clubs are failing our children.

A Proposed Children's Bill of Rights

Children shall have the right to enough nutritious food to eat to ensure his or her good health and proper growth, and adequate health care to ensure their healthy development. Guidelines for minimum requirements should be devised by an independent, professional panel of pediatricians and other qualified healthcare workers, not the government.

Children have the right to a safe and secure home. This means children should not be maintained in a homeless household, or an abusive household. If the parent(s) cannot provide that minimal level of subsistence, the child should be placed in foster care until the parent is able to do so.

Children have the right and responsibility to go to school and receive the best possible education for their needs. This means that not only does the family have a requirement to ensure the child understands the importance of this responsibility, but also that educational agencies must ensure the child receives the education he or she deserves, be that through standard public education, magnet programs, or educational vouchers.

Children have the right to proper physical, mental, and emotional care from their parents or foster parents. This includes both custodial and non-custodial parents. Parents who cannot or will not provide these things on a steady basis should have their parental rights terminated in a timely fashion.

Children have the right to a private and personal space, whether that is a bedroom or just a dresser. A child who is never trusted, never develops a sense of honor and self-pride.

Children have the right to participate in their own destinies and futures to the extent that is reasonable given the child's chronological and developmental age. This means parents should recognize that while their dream has always been to have their son graduate Clemson, he may actually want to backpack across Africa and then join the Peace Corps. Too many children have been caught in the trap of their parents' dreams.

Children have the right to learn values, morality, and spiritual lessons from their parents and other responsible adults as chosen by their parents or caregivers.

Children must be protected by parents, schools, local communities, and state and federal government from those who would prey upon them.

Children have the right to explore the world to the extent that it is safe, and to question and learn without restriction by parents or schools. While a very young child may not have the maturity to do this in a safe fashion, children should be encouraged to explore their world in an increasingly intense fashion as they grow older.

Children have the right to extra protection under the law as befits their minor and immature status. This means that they should be protected from those who would harm them, and that criminal behavior by children should be treated very differently from criminal behavior by an adult.

This Is A Work In Progress

These are only my ideas. Please feel free to add others in the Comments section, or to clarify or modify items that have been put here so that we can develop a true community-driven Children's Bill of Rights.

Published by Jamie K. Wilson

Jamie K. Wilson is the wife of a US sailor and mother of two teen boys, one Marine, and two beautiful baby girls. The family hails from Louisville, Kentucky originally.  View profile

16 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Taylor Rios1/9/2011

    I completely agree with you - if I were ever homeless, I would want my child to be in a foster home if no relatives or trusted friends were available. Children's safety and protection should come first. You have some very good ideas - emotional abuse of children is often overlooked because they have no bruises or broken bones but can be just as devastating. Children have the right to be loved... and unfortuantly, many parents view their children as a nuisance rather than a blessing and actually withhold love.

  • Hannah12/7/2007

    Jamie, something is messed up with the rating scale on this article. Just thought you would want to know. I gave you a 5, but it didn't show that.

  • Hannah12/7/2007

    Excellent! All I have to say is that I counseled too many parents that should not have been even raising dogs, no less children!

  • Jamie K. Wilson12/2/2007

    Another point: as one who was a single mother for years, I can tell you that it is MUCH harder to get out of a financial hole when you have to care for your children as well as yourself. It's harsh to have your children taken from you. But if it means getting you on your feet in a few months instead of a few years -- and then that child returned to you when you have a roof and a job and a childcare situation set up -- shouldn't it be considered?

  • Jamie K. Wilson12/2/2007

    (cont. from previous comment) Holding the family together at all costs -- well, face it, the child ALWAYS bears that cost. In every single case. Grownups can fight for themselves. Children can't.

  • Jamie K. Wilson12/2/2007

    Sigh. This is NOT proposed legislation. I just think that we can all get together and agree on some basic things children deserve: food, clothing, shelter, parents who love them and who live with them, a good education, a say in their futures. The purpose: a functioning guideline that enables all of us to have a clear picture of what our children need and deserve. All the PC that's going around is damaging our children. Who decides this? We all do, agreeing on what works. Do you take children from stable homes? Hell no. But I'm tired of seeing children basically held hostage for benefits by bad parents, or kept in terrible situations because a parent is too selfish to look to the child's best interests. Children shouldn't be taken from parents just due to poverty, bad luck, or even poor decisions by the parent. But keeping a child in foster care for years before terminating rights, well past the child's prime adoptable age, is also wrong. Holding the family together at all costs -- wel

  • ALBAN MEHLING11/21/2007

    You could be correct. Thank You fer sharin'. ;-}}>

  • Jamie K. Wilson11/19/2007

    But you all miss the point -- even you, dear Zac. This is MY take on what should be in a CBoR. We have bills of rights for medical patients, airline passengers, animals, and children of divorced parents -- but no one seems to agree on what civil rights a child should really have. Don't argue with my points -- present your own. If you have a better solution than mine, I really, truly, honestly want to hear it. Can we all agree that more needs to be done to protect our most vulnerable?

  • Jamie K. Wilson11/19/2007

    I'm forty. I have four children. I was a single mom for fifteen years, and have been homeless, jobless, and on welfare. I've also worked directly with welfare populations. Our current system is totally inadequate. AFA who is judged financially challenged -- simple. Do you have a home? Do you normally have electricity and plumbing? That bare minimum should be required.

  • Victor Frederick11/16/2007

    BTW, I agree with tasloi that poverty does not equal abuse. However, there is a difference between being poor and being homeless. I would argue that a child who is growing up on the streets is suffering from neglect, no matter how attentive and loving his or her parents are.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.