Although the United States has enjoyed an operational monopoly on stealth technology since the 1980s, it has not been the only country engaged in developing stealth capability. The European aerospace industry opted to forgo the expense of developing stealthy fighter aircraft, building fighters (Eurofighter, Rafale) that incorporated other advanced technologies.
However, the Russians plowed ahead. The current project is the Sukhoi PAK FA, with the prototype of that fighter -- the T-50 -- having embarked on its first test flight in January 2010, a full year before the J-20 and to considerably less fanfare. The T-50's maiden flight was twice as long as that of the J-20 to boot. The Russians also had a second stealth program, the MiG Project 1.44. This was canceled in the late 1990s, but not before producing a pair of flyable prototypes. The J-20 bears more than a striking resemblance to Project 1.44 prototypes, raising the very real question of whether the Russians sold technology from their canceled stealth fighter project to the Chinese. House Armed Services Chairman Howard "Buck" McKeon even commented that "[China] built it on information that they received from Russia, from a Russian plane, that they were able to copy." Clearly the Russians at least assisted the Chinese in their stealth program, and the vaunted J-20 might prove to be a revamped copy of a fighter abandoned by the Russians a decade ago in favor of the Sukhoi PAK FA.
Another source of potential technology is the F-117 that was shot down in the war with Serbia in 1999. Croatian sources report Chinese agents scouring the countryside where that bomber crashed. The MiG 1.44 was abandoned by this time, but with their formidable talent for reverse-engineering it is plausible that the Chinese gleaned considerable materials technology from the wreckage of this F-117.
Outside, objective tests of the plane's radar signature were not allowed at the test flight, and therefore whatever is known about its stealth and other capabilities is effectively what the Chinese government tells us. This calls attention to the nature of the J-20 test flight. The stark difference between the attention garnered by the J-20's maiden flight, which coincided with the visit of US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and the T-50 flight is noteworthy. It underscores a general theme that authoritarian regimes tend to exaggerate the success of their weapons programs as part of a policy of deterrence. The J-20 flight was as much a publicity stunt as a technical achievement.
Experts have noted that while the J-20 has definite stealth characteristics, the airframe shows substantial problems with its air intakes and air foils that probably compromise its stealth performance from certain angles. It is also unknown how far the Chinese are from developing a Low Probability of Intercept radar, which can be used without substantial fear of detection (and thus giving away the location of the fighter).
Of course, the plane shown at the test flight is a prototype and the production version will surely contain many improvements. However, that raises another point: even under normal circumstances, the time span between the first flight of a military prototype and first combat aircraft rolling off the production line is usually several years, and it may even be longer.
So the Chengdu J-20 did not come from nowhere. The fighter was almost certainly designed with Russian assistance, and probably incorporates the first-generation materials technology used in the F-117. The fighter will also appearing in the skies of East Asia in large numbers any time soon, as it probably will not enter service until the end of the decade at the earliest. While a major step forward for the China's military power and aviation industry, the aircraft is not nearly as shocking or as revolutionary as media reports might suggest.
Published by Rich Thomas - Featured Contributor in Travel
A Kentuckian and longtime resident of Washington, DC with an MA in international affairs, Thomas splits his time between American and Portugal. He works as a freelance writer both in print and online, writin... View profile
- Chinese J-20 Stealth Fighter Prototype: A Threat to U.S. Air Dominance?Photos of a Chinese J-20 stealth fighter have appeared on the internet this week, reminding the U.S. that our apparent dominance in stealth aircraft technology may not last forever.
- Chinese J-20 Stealth Fighter No Match for U.S. X-47B Unmanned Stealth BomberThe Chinese apparently have a new stealth fighter, the J-20, but the U.S. has an even newer stealth bomber, the X-47B. And ours flies itself.
- U.S. Defense Secretary Meets with China's President Under Cloud of Stealth Fighter...Robert Gates, U.S. Defense Secretary, met with President Hu Jintao of China today (1/10/2011). Looming over the meeting was the recent news of Chinese development of the J-20 stealth fighter.
- J-20 Stealth Fighter Not a Threat to America, According to China; But Americans Sh...Despite the obvious implication that China is competing with the U.S. for cutting-edge military technology, China today announced that its J-20 stealth technology is no threat to the U.S.
- China Obtained J-20 Stealth Technology from Russia; What Else Do They Have?That initial surprise at China's creation of a stealth fighter has been replaced by understanding today, as we have learned that China obtained the technology from Russia. But what else have they obtained?
- Chinese J 20 Stealth Fighter Planes - a Real Threat?
- Chinese Stealth Fighter: What it Means to Us
- Chinese Stealth Fighter Poses Challenge to United States
- The J20 Chinese Stealth Fighter Raises Additional Questions About China's Capabili...
- Chinese Stealth Fighter Points to Growing Rift Between PRC and US
- China Unveils New Stealth Fighter Aircraft
- Despite Chinese Stealth Fighter Threat, Pentagon Budget Decreased by $78 Billion





7 Comments
Post a Comment"Experts"
These "experts" provide no credible evidence themselves. Russian "experts" are even less credible than any Chinese expert, since they are known for boasting their outdated soviet-era crap to make poor third world nations buy their stuff.
Sorry. For me, the J-20 doesnt look like a MiG-1.44, nor does it look like a F-117. No matter what those "experts" and freedom-lovers claim, when an apple is an apple, it wont suddently become an orange, just because of some "credible" freedom magic.
You fail too, anon.
See - this clown is so communistical he doesn't understand concepts like "journalism" and "citations" as they exist in a free society. The article uses quotes from experts and citations (did you bother to check any of the links) to prove a case. I believe the CREDENTIALLED EXPERTS that were cited here over some anonymous jackass wrapped in his own flag any day. You have no credibility, man. None. Zip. Nada. Bupkis.
Great proof you have here.
The MiG1.44 has belly intakes, while the J-9-VII model has the same side-intakes coupled with delta-canard layout the J-20 has today. And the J-9-VII was cancelled in the 70's.
The author should provide some firm evidence before stating that the J-20 is based on the MiG1.44, even though it looks nothing like it, while it looks just like another chinese project that predates the MiG1.44.
Sorry, but it seems that your "freedom" means ignorance and stupidity, while my "slavery" means knowledge. I rather chose my "slavery".
Look, another Chinese guy who is so nationalist that he can't see past this own nose. He doesn't need his government to lie to him; this guy will lie to himself. And of course he tells people he disagrees with (with no proof whatsoever) to STFU, because he doesn't believe in free speech.
Next this kind of moron will tell us the Chinese didn't copy the Soyuz, all those Sukhois and Antonovs, etc, etc, etc.
Oh... Another ignorant westener "expert" who's claiming that the J-20 is a copy of russian hardware.
Sorry, but your ignorance is striking. The J-20's airframe is a direct successor of the J-9-VII project by Chengdu of the 70's and thus, predates the MiG1.44.
As long as you 'experts' are so ignorant about the Chinese aviation history, you better STFU about the J-20 in your 'Analysis'.
Excellent.... :o)
Thanks Rich
Lockhead Martin has developed a new "joint strike fighter". Boeing had made one also but lost the contract to LM. My son works for Boeing and showed it to us at an open house. The temp leaving the jet was the same as the as the temp outside the engine. The plane was so light in color it almost looked like a cloud. Technology!!!!