We happened to view the first showing at 11:50am on April 2nd and when you first put on those Buddy Holly glasses the previews get you ready. However, after the initial credits role and they look like they're right in your face, the rest of the movie is nothing of the sort.
In fact, about half way through I took off those 3D glasses and realized it wasn't much different at all. If you do the same, this Clash of the Titans movie will have a slight blur in certain spots, but you can watch most of it with the naked eye.
If I remember correctly the original Clash of the Titans was around 3 or 4 hours long with tons of storyline. This version cuts everything down to size and in all it lasts 1 hr 50 minutes. The acting is fine, there are a couple parts where the entire audience laughed, and you don't have to worry about any extreme intimate moments.
Even though it's rated PG-13, there really isn't anything in there that would terrify a child under 13 except for the ferry ride in the underworld. It's a little dark for some and there is death, but nothing you would consider out of the ordinary for a PG-13 rating.
If you remember Bubo (the little golden owl), he is only in this version for a moment. Perseus doesn't receive all the gifts from the gods he was given in the original Clash of the Titans, but the setup is much different. I don't want to give everything away, but just a few of the differences.
Actually I'll leave the rest for you to figure out. However, I strongly recommend disregarding the 3D version. I was hoping the Kraken would be right in front of you with the 3D glasses on, but it was pretty much the same.
So if you're ready to check out Clash of the Titans in 3D, be prepared for a disappointment. The good news is the ending leaves the door open for a sequel, depending on how it does at the box office of course.
The Contributor has no connection to nor was paid by the brand or product described in this content.
Published by Michael Grisso
"It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because by that time I was too famous."~Robert Benchley View profile
- Clash of the TitansSet to be released in early 2010, this remake of the 1981 classic is sure to amaze audiences and exploit the public's fascination with Greek Mythology.
"Clash of the Titans" Movie to Premiere on April 2, 2010One of the biggest movie blockbusters of 2010 is about to explode at the local cinema. On April 2 of 2010, the new film "Clash of the Titans" will premiere at a movie theater ne...- Clash of the Titans Remake Trailer Tantalizes Greek Mythology FansDiscussion of the 2010 remake of the 1981 film Clash of the Titans.
- Clash of the Titans Remake Trailer Out on the InternetThe trailer for the remake of the 1981 film Clash of the Titans is out on the Internet. The Clash of the Titans trailer consists of a lot of quick cut scenes of brawny guys in bronze age Greek armor and mythical beast...
- Movie Review: Clash of the Titans (1981)Movie Review: Clash of the Titans (1981) starring Laurence Olivier, Harry Hamlin, Judi Bowker, Burgess Meredith, Claire Bloom, Maggie Smith, Ursula Andress, Jack Gwillim
- Clash of the Titans: Movie Review
- Alyssa Milano Checks Out "Clash of the Titans" Movie Premiere
- Behind the Making of Louis Leterrier's Clash of the Titans
- Movie Review: Clash of the Titans (2010)
- Clash of the Titans Reviews Not so Titanic
- Clash of the Titans in 3D: A Review
- Wolf-Man a Gothic Winner, Clash of Titans - a Toss Up




2 Comments
Post a CommentMike... What's up man, where ya been?!
You're review is well written but I totally disagree. The movie looks like trash and instead of having a story line and actors who can actually act, it has mostly special effects and people who were put in the movie essentially to just look good. Sorry :(