This article stuck with me today, leaving me miserable and depressed. I have been contemplating whether I have a responsibility to join Hansen in civil disobedience, or whether Hansen is wasting his time because there is just no way people are going to make the sacrifices that would be necessary to have any effect. I have been looking out the windows and imagining the streets empty, the buildings crumbling, my city and the entire earth abandoned.
I know, it's quite dramatic, but I feel some variation of this once every couple of months, after I watch or read something that hits a certain nerve. My boyfriend refuses to let me watch the History / Discovery channel "end of the world" programs anymore, because I might be depressed for days. Being depressed and obsessing about end of the world scenarios is not very productive, but is it unnatural?
Shouldn't we be depressed and obsessive about this?
I really find it more interesting that I am able to forget about it and go on with my life after a day or two. If I refuse to think about it long enough, some subconscious process of denial takes over, and I am able be happy and focus on other things. Often, I will flip right past the magazine article about climate change. "I know," I might think to myself, "it's over for us. Sorry grandkids!"
I think there is some subconscious defense mechanism that will not allow me to truly contemplate the enormity of this problem most of the time. And I think the same thing is happening to most of the people out there. I know that there are a lot of people out there who don't believe in climate change, and I won't even attempt to guess what is going on in their heads. But the rest of us, who acknowledge the reality of the problem, and express concern, but then we have to decide what to make for dinner, and find a babysitter, and meet a deadline, and suddenly the extinction of the human race is barely an afterthought. I don't get it.
What allows us to know that something is real and yet not feel as if it is real? What do we do about it?
Published by Ellie Dawkins
- End of the World Fads from the Second Coming of Christ to Global Warming Thinking about the end of the world must be exciting for a lot of people. After all, we've beeing getting ourselves worked up about it for thousands of years.
The Year 2012: The End of the World as We Know It?Is it really the end of the world as we know it, or is it a bunch of hype? Let's explore the facts (if we can find any).- 2012 Mayan Calendar Prophecy: Does Galactic Alignment Mean End of the World?The Galactic Alignment: Will the end of the world come on December 12, 2012? Some people fear this date because "the Mayan calendar ends" on this date. Ever wonder why the Mayan calendar ends in 2012? And how does the...
2012: The End of the World Claims Analyzed and DebunkedThe world won't end in 2012. The Mayans never predicted it, Planet X doesn't exist, and the orbits of the planets don't allow for any sort of alignment.
Does the End of the Mayan Calendar Mean the End of the World?Newspapers, books, movies and other media sources have opened us up to the very possibility of the worlds end in just a few short years.
- The Ability or Inability of the Arts to Affect Social Change
- The Only Review of the State of the Union Address by President Bush You Need to Read
- NASA Scientist James Hansen Places Foot in Mouth on Global Warming?
- NASA Scientist James Hansen on a Roll!
- NASA Scientist James Hansen Releases Source Code: Skeptics Rejoice
- James Hansen Versus the Bush Administration
- How to Survive 2012 (the End of the World)



