Clintons Attack Obama and Martin Luther King is Collateral Damage

Clintons Label Obama and King Overrated

Donnell Russell
The mainstream media, has really gone off the deep end. New Hampshire was not an "upset" win for Senator Hillary Clinton. It was only a "surprise" turn around to the media that predicted an Obama victory based on the same media's own polling and reporting. Hillary received 2% more votes than Obama in New Hampshire. They received the same number of delegates. Delegates (2025 to be exact), not votes, win the nomination. That is called a "tie".
Bill and Hillary are on the attack. This short 9 minute video demonstrates just how far these two will go to win.

Don't dismiss the video as the work of a closeted Barack Obama supporter exploiting political gaffes. I am not supporting Obama in secret. I am openly Pro-Obama. I am also an amateur writer and novice media producer, so imagine what that "Mass Right Wing Conspiracy" would do to Clinton in a general election. Besides, isn't it Senator Clinton the candidate always reminding us of her years of political experience anyway?

Here is the video link:

Cintons on Obama and Dr. King

Published by Donnell Russell

US Army Combat Veteran, an EMT, and security guard. I have had it with political parties, the "PC" generation, the religious right, the secular left, network/cable news, reality TV, and standardized testing....  View profile

Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Kucinich and Gravel are candidates for the 2008 democratic nomination. 15 others have filed with the FEC and have active campaigns, including a man named after a former president, Grover Cleveland Mullins.

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Alyce Rocco1/17/2008

    Must say I am not doing too well on my new "short comments" goal. Did you see the 'New Jersey Rising' You Tube video? Very encouraging.

  • Alyce Rocco1/17/2008

    I got two subscription notices on this article. Glad I saw it again, will look for the book. I am rather one of those apathetic "can't fight city hall" type of voters and must credit Obama's "fairy tale story" with giving me the audacity to hope that my voice (along with millions of others) can and will be heard in DC. It was Bill Clinton's race for the job, that motivated me to re-register to vote back then. The internet makes it easier for me to make more informed choices than I could yesterday, due to ease of looking up histories of the Candidates and checking voter records, and government websites to see what they have done in their states. Doubt that I would have voted for Clinton then if I had known about his misdeeds in Arkansas and I am not talking about the ladies, but his misuse of power entrusted to him by the citizens that elected him. Good luck on reaching the closest friends, I am concentrating on my NJ family.

  • Larry Fowler1/17/2008

    Now you are a citizen example of what Justice Breyer calls "Active Liberty". I should re-read that book and write a review for AC. The Clintons, and others in both majority parties, seem to have this sense of entitlement to office. You know the old "It's my turn" political mentality that produced candidates like Mondale and Dole. Ideas and change be damn.

    Great to hear it, now if I can just "caucus" about 51,000,000 more of my closest friends...

  • Alyce Rocco1/17/2008

    I do not agree with Obama on everything and did some hard thinking before marking my mail-in ballot to vote for him in California''s primary. I would vote for anyone to help prevent a Clinton victory and I feel he would make a good President as much as candidates that I may agree with more who are basically out of the running for their parties bid to run in November. I just read yesterday, that lobbyist automatically grant her more delegates, then we, the people. Reading that inspired me to try to buy my seat at the government table with a donation to the Obama campaign. I hope that those who want transparency in government do likewise.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.