In the Books, Magazines, and Newspapers industry the money again was given in favor of the Democrats. The Democrats in 2004 received $11,656,356, which was 75% of the funds, whereas the Republicans received $3,843,502, which accounted for the other 25% of the money. In 2004, the number of individual donations from this industry went from 5 million dollars to 15 million dollars, which in the industry is quite a substantial increase. In every year except 1996, this industry has always given more money to the Democrats.
The biggest source of campaign cash is within the print industry. Paper costs and mailing rate are major concerns of the industry as well as the Web. In 2004, the print industry gave $6,251 to the Democrats, $4,594 to the Republicans, and $3,750 to the one and only Independent in Congress. Their total donations to date are $1,713,606. In terms of the Senate, the total donations overall to date is $3,784,310. Again the Democrats dominate the most money donations from this industry.
When looking at the top contributors of 2004, one cant help but notice that the number one contributor NewsCorp gives 38% of the $430,875 to Democrats. With Rupert Murdoch being one of the most conservative Media Owners in the industry, I found this to be very interesting, however I thought it was at least a nice gesture to give some money to both sides of the political spectrum. The number 2 contributor for 2004 for was Paisano Publications, giving all $210,017 to the Republicans. The third highest contributor was Phillips International, again giving 100% of its contributions to the Republican Party.
The top recipients for 2004 for donations from the print industry were of some shock to me as I thought for sure that George W. Bush would have been the highest, however John Kerry took that spot. John Kerry received $2,661,271 and George W. Bush came in 2nd place with $681,195. There is a huge difference in terms of money there, and I found that to be rather interesting considering who won the actual presidential election. In a close 3rd was Dean Howard who didn't receive much less than our current President with an amount of $609,944.
Published by Colleen Leary
My name is Colleen Leary and I graduated from Niagara University. I enjoy the Pittsburgh Steelers, Pittsburgh Penguins, and traveling the world. View profile
- Political Associations 2008, Part I: Your Friend, Your EnemyOverview of people with bad reputations associated with upcoming political candidates.
A 3D Experience of the Political SpectrumThis is simple explanation of a three dimensional graph of the political spectrum. - The Mass Media and the Political Agenda Q&ASince the media is a business, it seems unreasonable for political candidates to not have to pay for their coverage. It is the same thing as asking, should the political candidates receive free food if they go to McDo...
- Offshore Outsourcing in America's "White-Collar" Industry:This article addresses America's growing outsourcing industry and analyzes whether this is a benefit or a detriment.
- The Ninth Malaysia Plan Seeks to Improve Country's Economy and StatusThe Ninth Malaysia Plan (9MP) is a plan for Malaysia for the years 2006 to 2010. The 9MP is focusing more on enhancement of national competition in the country and resilience of the national economy.
- Why Political Candidates Love Hollywood Support
- Do Celebrity Endorsements Help Political Candidates?
- Political Science Literature Review Regarding Erber
- Six Websites to Learn About Political Candidates
- Selfish, Individualistic Desires May Impact Political Party Membership
- Political Candidates Prefer an American Public that Doesn't Ask Questions
- Internet Changing the Face of Political Campaigning



