Comparing California's Prop 8 to the Japanese American Internment
A Commercial Made with No Common Sense
This is how one of the many "No on Prop 8" television commercials started, and to me, it is absurd and offensive to compare the internment of the Japanese Americans with the right to marry for gays and lesbians. Granted, I know there are many gays and lesbians who have faced extreme discrimination and prejudice within society, their friends, or their family, and I would be stupid to try to say that I know how it feels. However, Proposition 8 is not about how hard it is to live as a gay or lesbian, it is about the single issue of being allowed to be legally married. I have relatives who have told me about the internment camps, and being banned from being legally recognized as married is nothing compared to what the Japanese Americans had to go through.
Here's a little background for those who do not know about the Japanese internment camps. Right after the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States government felt it was unsafe to let Japanese Americans to live freely in their country. President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which allowed the government to relocate about 120,000 Japanese Americans from their homes and lives, many of who were born citizens. The Japanese Americans were allowed to take very few things to the "relocation centers" and the rest they tried to sell. Many non-Japanese Americans offered to buy their belongings at extremely low prices, because they knew if the Japanese American familes couldn't sell it, someone would just come and steal it anyways. Anything else the Japanese American familes could not get rid of in time, were eventually stolen while they were in the camps.
While in Manzanar and the other camps around the country, prisoners were forced to live in shoddy barracks surrounded by fences with armed men in watchtowers. The entire camp was poorly constructed, so there were holes in the walls of the barracks, which made it difficult to sleep when the strong desert winds kicked up sand and rocks through the cracks. Families were closed off with partitions that did not have ceilings, which meant that it was impossible to have any kind of privacy. The camp toilets and showers were communal, with no partitions or dividers. As you can imagine, no one was allowed to leave the camp.
Four and a half years later, in 1945, Manzanar officially closed. However, many did not want to leave because they had nowhere to go, knowing that all of their belongings, houses, and cars had been either sold or stolen. Manzanar at least offered a roof over their heads. The government would not allow anyone to stay at the camps, and the Japanese Americans were forced to relocate again, but this time, out into the real world where most families had nothing.
Once the government decides to gather all the gays and lesbians and force them out of their lives to place them in a guarded camp to live in subpar conditions for four years, then they can use the internment of Japanese Americans to promote their cause. Until then, please do not try to argue that the issue of gay marriage comes even close to the tragedy of ruining the lives of an entire race of citizens. I'm just glad the people making those "No on Prop 8" commercials were smart enough to also not compare their cause to the slavery of African Americans.
Published by Kyle Mori
i'm a student who enjoys writing whatever's in my mind. View profile
- Californians to Vote on End to Animal Cruelty with Prop 2California to decide for a ban on animal cruelty with prop 2.
- California's Unrealistic Renewable Energy Goal - Prop. 7We like to lead the nation and we love renewable energy - so why is Prop. 7 such a bad idea?
- Ten Great AC Articles Halloween Prop IdeasA list of my ten favorite Halloween Prop ideas from around AC - including severed body parts and dead rats, yum!
- California's Prop. 8 - a Simple Constitutional Issue Impacted by Complex EmotionsA constitutional Review of California's Choice to Allow Gender Neutral Civil Marriage revealed it was a right that must be upheld. Now, there ia a ballot measure, Prop. 8, to overturn the courts and amend the State C...
Getting Prop. 8 StraightLearn what Prop. 8 does and does NOT do and why it's important that we all learn the difference.
- Business Ideas for Useless Junk Owners: Movie Prop Rentals
- The Lincoln Continental: A Famous Prop from The Godfather
- Michael Myers Head on a Stake: One Scary DIY Halloween Prop
- Lab Jar Eyeballs - Halloween Prop Review
- Hanging Heads of Lost Souls Trio - Halloween Prop Review
- How to Create a Hedge Prop Using UVMapper Classic and Poser
- Boppy Pillow Photography Prop




1 Comments
Post a CommentActually, if you draw a line you can get from denial of property rights to internment. It happened in Germany in the 1930s. The Nazi regime first took away the right to own businesses, then property, then the right to employment (and civil recognition of marriage) . Then ghettos were formed and finally, 'internment'. Civil marriage is a contractual agreement under the auspice of the state conveying common property rights. In California, where Prop. 8, subject to pending court review, was passed - there was no functional equivalent to marriage. Domestic partnerships were open to gay and straight couples but they did not convey the same rights as civil marriage - so the court ruled civil marriage had to include gays. The voters overturned their own constitution to leave out certain citizens. It isn't as severe as the rights stripped from Japanese Americans during WWII, but it is a common first step.