John Locke that that private property was a natural right, and one of the most important ones at that. One of Locke's most famous quotes is that all men have the right to "life, liberty and property." Locke discusses his theories of property in his Second Treatise of Government. Locke believes that god gave man the earth to hold in common, but when a man adds his labor to the earth it becomes his private property. When a man plows a field than the field becomes his, as well as the fruits of that land. Whatever man adds his labor to becomes private property for their exclusive use.
In Locke's eyes the main purpose of the government is too protect individuals private property. In a state of nature there is no way for each individual to ensure that their property remains safe from every one else. Once conflict over private property starts to occur the people come together and use to their reason to draft a social contract that will protect their property. Locke also says that before the introduction of private property men live in an egalitarian state of nature, but with the introduction of private property it caused a hierarchy to form. it is because of private property that men are forced to form a contract amongst themselves and craft a government. (http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/4n.htm)
Karl Marx's views towards private are quite different than those of John Locke. In his major work the Communist Manifesto he states that "the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." (Marx) Marx believed that the bourgeoisie controlled all of the profit creating property and used it to enslave the proletariat, or working class. Marx disagrees with John Locke's theory of property, Marx argues that workers labor doesn't grant them any property whereas the capitalist class has all the property but does no labor. In the Communist Manifesto it is argued that labor has been used throughout history to repress and exploit the working class and that the only things that change are the structures of the exploitation.
Both Locke and Marx's views of private property have been highly influential. John Locke's theories of property have been most influential to capitalist thinkers whereas Karl Marx's work have been most influential to communist and socialist thinkers and governments. The best way to study the way that these two different ideology work in application is too look at the two case studies that best exemplify the divergent theories, namely the United States and the Soviet Union.
The founders of the United States were highly influenced by the thinking of Locke when they wrote their constitution. In the Fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights it states that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This amendment guarantees that private property will be protected from the government. Also, obviously, it is against the law for any one to steal or hamper with anyone else's private property. John Locke would probably be happy with this system because it fulfills his government's basic purpose of protecting private property.
In 1917 a group of revolutionaries called the Bolsheviks overthrew the Russian Czar so they could put in a Communist government in place. The person whose thinking was most influential to the revolution, and the government that they put into place, was Karl Marx. In the Soviet System all private property and means of production were, theoretically, owned by the people. How this system worked was the Communist party controlled the industry and private property in place of the people. Under this system it just perpetuated the system of the working class and the bourgeoisie, except now the bourgeoisie were the members of the Communist Party who controlled and exploited the workers who they were supposedly in league with and representing. All in all John Locke's ideas about private property has fared better than Karl Marx's in practical application.
Works Cited
"Locke: Social Order." Philosophy Pages. 30 Apr. 2007.
Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto. 30 Apr. 2007.
Published by calean
hey all, I was born on the fourth of July way back in 1987 in Durham NC. So far I've lived im just about every part of NC and move constantly. Oh and I'm cool and stuff and I suppose I'll end here so I'll... View profile
- John Locke on Justifying the Right to PropertyAccording to John Locke, every individual has the right to life, liberty and property. Labor justifies the personal ownership and use of property.
- John Locke and the Development of English Common LawThough slightly flawed in its early development, the ideas of the English Parliament and John Locke's theories in the seventeenth century showed particular insight into the needs of a representative political system a...
- An Analysis of John Locke's EssayJohn Locke's essay, Some Further Considerations Concerning Our Simple Ideas of Sensation, presents us with the distinction of qualities, primary and secondary. Both are used to explain the thought process of identify...
The Life of John LockeJohn Locke was born in Wrington to Puritan parents. His father was a country lawyer who served in a cavalry company on the Puritan side in the early stages of the English civil...- All About Terry O'Quinn, Aka John Locke of TV's LostTerry O'Quinn plays the troubled, determined character John Locke on ABC's hit television show "Lost." These ten facts will introduce you to the actor behind the role.
- The Life of Karl Marx
- Karl Marx and Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte
- Social and Political Contexts Within Karl Marx's "Eighteenth Brumaire"
- Examining Karl Marx, Max Weber, Sigmund Freud, and Emile Durkheim
- Marx's Concept of Man Offers A Better Understanding of Karl Marx
- Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto: A Brilliant Display of a Compelling Argument for...
- John Locke's Theory of Personal Identity




3 Comments
Post a CommentMarx sux, Locke rocks.
This is a poorly and cursory article.
I feel it does a disservice to both thinkers and has little or no applicable information. It muddies issues and is not written to where a student or interested party could benefit from it.
John Locke was not an empiricist. I'm not sure why he would be known as such. For example, in Chapter V. of His Second Treatise Of Government, his entire argument for why financial inequalities came to be is based on a blatant lie! He completely botches biblical passages and makes up stories that aren't even true in order to support and argument that benefits himself. Marx on the other hand, uses empirical evidence - actually historical events - to explain the origins of capitalism.