Liberals believe that there are no moral absolutes. Liberals beleive that it is up to each individual to come up with a "moral code" that is right for him and his situation. For example: Liberals will justify stealing food if their family is hungry.
On the other hand, myself (and most conservatives) believe that there are moral absolutes (universal spiritual principles)that are just as relevant today as they were 5000 years ago. Morality does not change through time and circumstance. Conservatives believe that it is honorable to strive toward these spiritual ideals although we are incapable of fully reaching them. However, spiritual progress, not perfection can be achieved during our lifetime..
Published by garyganu
I'm a 53 year old male. My unique life experiences helped form my political and social views. I write about conservative news and opinion, mostly opinion. I base my views on my personal experience, reason an... View profile
- Sarah Palin is Our Savior and Going Rogue the Way to GoI express my opinion on how I think Palin could be a force of good, even for those on the left of the political spectrum. We all share some causes and tackling them as women might just make a difference.
Moral Absolutism and the Rise of Authoritarianism in AmericaThe moral absolutists have taken hold of social policy in America. As a result, the road to a stricter authoritarian approach to government has been paved with the loss of conce...- Should a Country's Laws Be Based Upon Moral Code?Most of the time we believe that laws and rules contain a moral dimension to them. But morality is just as ambiguous as the law.
- Eight Basic Beliefs of the Seventh Day Adventist ChurchBasic beliefs of the Seventh Day Adventist church
- How Your Money Beliefs Affect Your Profits in the MarketsYour positive attitude about having money can go a long way toward increasing your profitability in the markets. Your false beleifs about money may be the reason your hard earned profits vanish so quickly.
- Terrorism and Iraq: The Connection Neither Liberals nor Conservatives Want to Talk...
- How Are Liberals Really Different from Conservatives?
- Absolute Truth and Moral Absolutes
- Tea Party Movement Core Beliefs
- Sarah Palin, Pentecostal Beliefs, the Press and the American Voter
- Leo Strauss: Modernity, Postmodernity, Defamation and a False Enigma
- One's Beliefs Determines Their Life Results




8 Comments
Post a Commentjust passing through, universal spiritual principles are common sense. Like our inalienable rights, they do come from God. Don't you think that our creator gave us the ability to discern right from wrong? Just as He gave us the ability to procreate and the ability to provide for our needs.
let me guess... the absolute morality of the universe comes from the creator god of the jews (as refined by jesus christ, martin luther and whomever founded your subfaction of christianity) and everyone else is simply wrong about good and evil, right?
Emma, I don't know what times that you are talking about, However, in a time that women relied on a husband to provide for her family, a woman with child must marry to save her and her child's life. Are you talking about "shotgun weddings" for statutory rape? In any case these are much more humane remedies than killing the unborn child as many women do today.
It used to be moral to force a rape victim to marry her rapist, too.
Ttarler, Our actions on Earth also have eternal consequences. I am guided by those as well as the obvious ones.
I disagree slightly. I don't believe in absolute traits (virtue ethics) but I do believe in an absolute framework (consequentialist). I like to look at the consequences of my actions and make ethical judgements from there. In my experience, conservatives tend to look at either the intent of the moral actor, or certain characteristics of that character.
I don't know that stoning a misbehaving child was ever considered the righteous thing to do. However, in the olden days, they did not have the wealth to provide police, courts and prisons. Most people had to work long hard hours just to feed themselves, they had no money or desire to feed and house criminals. Most crimes needed o be dealt with on-the-spot. Harsh measures were their only choice.
ok, so morals don't change, then explain how stoning a misbehaving child is moral?