Although the breed was "discovered" by Sandra Hochenedal in Rayville, Louisiana in 1983, it was far from the first sighting of a short-legged cat. Felines of the same stature were seen in Great Britain in 1944, Stalingrad in 1953, New York in the 1950s, and New England in the 1970s, but the line was not further developed and seemed to be phased out naturally.
This may be in whole or in part caused by the gene that actually causes the deformity, called an autosomal dominant gene, meaning that it is a dominant gene that is not located on a sex chromosome, commonly referred to as an "X" or "Y" chromosome. It is considered a naturally occurring mutation - it occurred without human intervention. Because of the nature of this gene, if two cats are bred that both carry what is termed the "dwarf gene", the embryos are not viable and will perish before birth. On the other hand, when a Munchkin cat is bred with a standard cat it results in a mixed litter - consisting of both short- and long-legged kittens. Since in the previous sightings these cats were not selectively bred, it stands to reason that the combination of the aforementioned breeding problems contributed to the death of the line in those earlier sightings.
The breeding of the Munchkin is the cause of much controversy in the cat world. There are those who say that the breeding of this cat is unethical, as it is an exploitation of a physical deformity for appearance and profit. On the other side of the fence it is argued that since the mutation occurs naturally, human intervention has little or nothing to do with the creation and development of the line. There seems to be support for both sides. So who is right?
Considering that in previous situations the line died out when left to its own devices with no human intervention, it has to be concluded that selective breeding by humans was a definite factor in establishing the Munchkin breed. The fact that it was a naturally occurring mutation that caused the new trait does not change the fact that it was then twisted and exploited. The question is whether or not this practice is unethical. Some veterinarians are concerned about a condition called lordosis, a downward curvature of the spine that can cause compression of the heart and lungs in severe cases. Lordosis can occur in any cat breed, but higher rates have been seen in the Munchkin breed. Many breeders deny that this is an increased risk in Munchkins, and early studies found no correlation to the disorder and the breed. However these studies were considered inconclusive, as the breed has been around for such a short period of time.
The selective breeding of animals to encourage "quirky" appearance traits is not a new process. It's been seen and debated before, as with the Manx breed. The main difference here is that the Manx suffers from many health problems and defects due to the selective breeding process, while at this point there is no data to show that the same is true for the Munchkin. This brings us to a "wait and see" type of situation.
That in itself seems inhumane. Why risk possible painful side effects and deaths for the sake of appearances? Sure, the Munchkin is cute and cuddly, but no more so than any other breed of cat. If you were given the choice to ensure that your children would have small straight noses, a particular type of hair, long legs, or any number of purely physical "desirable" attributes, would you go through with it if there were even the slightest chance that something could go wrong because of your intervention?
SOURCES:
http://us.iams.com/iams/en_US/jsp/IAMS_Page.jsp?pageID=CBD&breedPage=munchkin.html
http://www.munchkins.com/page12_Lordosis_xrays
htmlhttp://cats.about.com/cs/breedprofiles/p/Munchkin.htm
Published by Ashley Hudson
Nothing much to know =) View profile
- Is the Ragdoll Cat Really the Right Breed for Me?
- How to Apply for a Permit to Import a Cat to Australia
- The NEW Wheatley High School
- New York Subway System Flooding Takes New Yorkers-And MTA-"By Surprise"
- Kennedy and The Honorary Title Get Ready to Release New Music to the Masses
- Cat Head Cheese, Cat Sause, Cat Faux Foie Gras
- Is Your First Cat Jealous of the New Cat?







1 Comments
Post a CommentExcellent article! I hate to admit it, but I almost got one of these cats not too long ago. Of course, she was being given away and I was going to take her if no one else wanted her, but still. I do not agree with genetically messing with ANYTHING! They may be cute, but it definitely doesn't make it right. Great job!