To begin with, let's take a look at the basic feudal system.
The social strata of the Middle Ages relied almost entirely upon strictly defined hierarchies. At the top of this hierarchy sat the king; a ruler who gained power through blood ancestry, war, or other means, and who was often purported to be divine in stature. Beneath the monarch's power were Lords. Lords controlled land in the kingdom and swore fealty to the king in return for safety and access to resources. Lords also controlled men called Knights. Knights swore fealty to lords and often owned lands within the Lord's domain. These men could be called upon to fight wars for the lords and for the king. Beneath all of these land-owning men sat serfs. Serfs toiled in the fields all day long, breaking their backs in pursuit of a tenuous comfort granted them by the knights, lords, and king. These men and women were the great majority in medieval life. They suffered the most, went hungry the most, and died of the most diseases. They were the destitute and the downtrodden.
In Corporate America, there is a king known as the CEO. While we have stripped these economic giants of their divinity, we still shower them with completely ludicrous benefits packages, tax incentives, and pay rates. Below these magnates are executives who also sport healthy incomes and benefits packages, and who grant the CEO great power in return for the comfort and safety of their persons. Below these high executives are administrators, managers, and middle managers who struggle under pressure to produce or be replaced. These people will often earn enough to live and support a family, but little more. Below even these bureaucrats, managers, and administrators, reside the greatest numbers of people: Corporate Serfs. These are not serfs with a shovel or plough. These are serfs with cash registers, with paperwork, with mops and buckets, and without whom the tyranny of the corporate hierarchy could not exist. These people barely make enough to support themselves, let alone a family. They are the uninsured, the struggling, and the desperate.
When put side by side, it is easy to see the parallels between these two hierarchical systems. What is important to take from this parallel is the manifestly inequitable way that these hierarchies work. In no way can it be as simple as "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps." Pulling oneself up necessitates having the resources to do so, resources that are difficult to come by in a dead-end job working just over minimum wage. That is not to say that it is impossible to pull oneself out of poverty. However, it is a much publicized rarity, not a typical fact.
The majority of people slave away in corporations, dealing with intense pressures from the people above them, low pay, and mindless and degrading tasks at work. So advanced are we, that we have gladly inherited a system made use of almost a thousand years ago to keep stability in a time of constant war and chaos. Instead of advancing the comfort and well being of all people in a time of relative peace (at least domestically), we have succeeded in providing economic comfort for the few, while the many languish in unfulfilling and unsupportive careers. Corporate serfdom is disgusting, and we should work to find a paradigm that benefits a majority of people, not a minority of elite individuals born into privilege and resource.
Published by Paul Masters
Paul was born in the United States Virgin Islands and now lives in Boston, MA. He attended Guilford College, where he was a Theatre Studies/English major. He is now a graduate student In Dramatic Art at Tuft... View profile
- Shaking Babies and Butts as Part of Corporate America DisrespectCorporate America needs to exercise better common sense when they market products.
- A Look at Corporate America and the Education SystemTaking a deeper look into corporate America and the American education system and what it's becoming.
- Hacking Corporate AmericaThe public is only made aware of a very few of the many cyber attacks and corporate america is to blame.
- Pressures on Young Businessmen in Corporate AmericaThis article describes pressure put on young businessmen from Corporate America, and showcases some of the struggles graduates have entering the workforce.
- Choosing Family Over Corporate AmericaAs the pressures demanded of low-level employees in Corporate America mount, more and more people are finding themselves having to choose between a career and their family.
- Corporate America Meets Feudalism: The Path to Freedom
- Why People Hate Corporate America
- Writing in Corporate America
- Is Corporate America Really "High School" for Adults?
- Taking on Corporate America - Why Modern Technology Will Change the Face of Work
- What's Become of Corporate America?
- Corporate America and the Death of the Work Ethic

6 Comments
Post a CommentWe have been in economic fuedalism since Reagan and his tax cutting and union busting. The rise of the CEO lords and their reducing the positions of the serfs by sending their work overseas followed. The problem that the CEOs don't seem to get is that since Henry Ford we have developed a consumer based economy. The downgrading of the middle class has converted the consumers to survivors who don't consume more than necessities. Thus we seem to be in an unending downward economic spiral. That doesn't concern the CEOs as they will jump aboard their foreign flagged yachts (on which they don't pay taxes) and sail off into the sunset.
The middle class should have been concentrating on NET WORTH for the last 50 years. Instead we go into debt buying junk designed to become obsolete. When do you hear economists talk about how much Americans lose on depreciation of automobiles every year? When do you hear economists talk about the planned obsolescence of automobiles.
Now we need bloated software to force us to buy more expensive computer hardware. Most people are not physicists and theoretical mathematicians. We need to waste time on more sophisticated computer games. YEAH RIGHT!
http://booksliterature.com/showpost.php?p=721&postcount=10
http://booksliterature.com/showpost.php?p=722&postcount=11
psik
I disagree with Dean. The government of a nation is wholly responsible for protecting and providing for its people through law and regulation. Without regulation to balance corporate power, industry runs amok. There are many historical instances of this type of corporate hegemony, and I consider Ayn Rand's philosophies to be patently ridiculous. The only way to keep the working class from being trampled is through local ownership of raw materials and production. We need to stop thinking in terms of big business, and start thinking in terms of local sustainability and economic welfare.
What you're all forgetting is that the ONLY way these "evil" corporations can establish their feudalistic system is through the unholy alliance between gov't and business (economics). Big business WANTS gov't regulation. All under the guise of "protecting" the little guy. When in fact, it is a way of keeping resources and access away from the little guy. If we follwed the CONSTITUTION and prohibited gov't from regulating everything from breathing to dying, we'd be better off. Under a TRUE capitalistic system, our current predicatment could never rear it's ugly head. Read Ayn Rand and wake up.
Amen, brother!
You are exactly right, corporate America does seek to further enhance the inequalities of society until what we have is techno-feudalism. The middle class is a very small blip on the historical landscape that the aristocratic classes want very much to diminish..