He belied the argument that bloggers and citizen journalists can replace traditional reporters and newspapers, then thoroughly explained why unrealistic profit expectations did more to kill journalism than the Internet and other new media.
HBO fans will recognize David Simon's name from his TV show, "The Wire," but he doesn't just produce great fictional news stories. He knows the real news industry from the inside as a long-serving, acclaimed reporter. Print journalism, he said, became a money-making tool for national corporations and slowly surrendered its ability to do important, expensive investigative reporting.
"Where family ownership might have been content with ten or 15 percent profit, the chains demanded double that and more," he said. "And the cutting began, long before the threat of new technology was ever sensed."
He said what I have been saying for years about the state of journalism, and made arguments about local journalism that mirror my arguments in this piece about the Rocky Mountain News.
Traditional journalism costs a lot of time and money, and newspapers are the only way news is thoroughly covered in most cities. Buy your local newspaper, then watch local news the same day. I predict most TV stories were already covered in the newspaper, with the exception of crimes or accidents the station picked up on a scanner.
To be sure, I am glad the Senate gave Simon and others a forum to talk about newspapers, but the hearings might imply government intervention in the private news industry. Government ownership or control of newspapers is not acceptable, and Simon argues for a non-profit model and a way for surviving newspapers and wire services to charge news aggregators for content. Both can be accomplished without government intervention.
Of course, bloggers have already offered counterattacks to Simon's criticism of citizen journalists. They offer examples of bloggers working on firsthand, investigative reporting. However, they are the exception, and they don't cover every city. I am trying to start some first-hand reporting on local stories here in Fort Collins, but I need more steady freelance income before I can afford to "donate" more of my time as a citizen journalist.
Even bloggers who do firsthand reporting typically come from a slanted perspective. Arguably, newspapers also slant the news, but they also cover more of it. A newspaper is expected to cover all the local government discussions and decisions that affect the community. Bloggers are more likely to pick and choose issues that fit their niches.
Published by Steve Graham
Steve Graham is a Colorado journalist who jumped into the freelance world after nearly 10 years as a reporter and editor for community newspapers. He has written extensively about entertainment, politics and... View profile
- Thorough Reporting Methods for Citizen JournalistsIf you're a citizen journalist who wants to write credible articles and gain an audience, then you need to develop thorough reporting methods.
- Should Newspapers Use the Work of Citizen Journalists?Clever editors who welcome and publish the work of citizen journals, create a win-win situation. Here's why...
MTV to Hire Citizen Journalists for Political CoverageMTV has taken a step toward connecting with real people and real journalism with citizens journalists.
The Death of News, or the New Face of JournalismA look at the decline of newspapers, the perceived "softness" of conventional media, the rise of niche cable broadcasts and newsblogs, and what it means for the future face of n...
- How Citizen Journalists Should Use Communal Knowledge
- The Future of Pagan Leadership, Part 3
- Citizen Journalists Vs. Traditional Journalists
- Best Blogging Software for Citizen Journalists
- Are Online Citizen Journalists Free of Traditional Restraints?
- Future of Local Newspapers: Making the Transition to a Completely Paperless Produc...
- The Very Uncertain Future of Journalism, the Nation's Eyes, Ears and Mouth




1 Comments
Post a CommentYou said, "Even bloggers who do firsthand reporting typically come from a slanted perspective. Arguably, newspapers also slant the news, but they also cover more of it. A newspaper is expected to cover all the local government discussions and decisions that affect the community. Bloggers are more likely to pick and choose issues that fit their niches." Sure, bloggers are a bit choosy too, but I would disagree and state that maybe newspapers in larger cities do a more comprehensive covering of local stories and events, but small town newspapers can be just as closeminded as a blogger. And when I view something written by a blogger, I know inherently it is likely slanted to their viewpoint. For a newspaper to slant and bias, that is somehow worse since it is owned by shareholders/families or whatever. They are there to give fair analysis so you can make up your own mind. That's why you pay for subscriptions... for fair news. Bloggers are free, so I take what they say with a grain of