Could Barack Obama Win Georgia? Georgia Polling Indicates Obama, John McCain in Dead Heat
Libertarian Candidate Bob Barr May Prove Spoiler in Presidential Race
Conducted on June 18, the Insider Advantage poll shows Senator John McCain with a one point advantage over Senator Barack Obama, 44% to 43%. The significance of this poll rests in the remaining 13% of the poll numbers. In all other polls, according to RealClearPolitics.com, McCain leads by double digits in the conservative state, but add in native son Bob Barr, who has been nominated as the Libertarian candidate for president, and you have a virtual tie. Bob Barr, a popular former Republican Georgia congressman, polls at 6%, leaving 7% undecided. Still, that 6% eats away at the McCain lead and could prove to be John McCain's undoing in Georgia in the general election, siphoning off just enough disaffected Republican voters from McCain for him to lose Georgia and its 15 electoral college votes.
Rasmussen polls showed John McCain with a ten-point lead on June 10 (51% to 41%), a reduced lead compared to the 14-point margin he enjoyed a month before (53% to 39%).
And that isn't all the bad news for the McCain campaign. It just might get worse.
According to Newsweek magazine, two more aspects of the race may come into play in Georgia and cost McCain the state in November. One of those is Senator Obama's decision not to take federal matching funds for his campaign, choosing to run solely on individual contributions from his supporters. In addition to the great PR move to not accept donations from political action committees (PACs) and special interest groups or lobbyists, this allows Obama to collect as much money as his supporters wish to give and allows him to spend as much as he wants from his already massive war chest. Georgia will be the recipient of millions of dollars worth of Obama campaign ads (as will 17 other states) geared to show Obama as the more electable candidate.
The second problem facing Senator McCain is the African American vote in Georgia. CNN exit polling of the Georgia Primary had 88% of the black vote going to Senator Obama over Senator Clinton. Andrew Romano of Newsweek magazine reports that the Democratic Party has targeted two important core groups among African Americans: those registered voters who did not vote in the last election (460,000) and the half million unregistered potential voters that the Democratic Party is intent on recruiting for the general election. That's almost one million voters that did not come into play in 2004. Consider that George Bush defeated John Kerry in 2004 by 550,000 votes and the Democratic strategy becomes only too obvious.
The argument can be made that John McCain might take some of the African American vote. This is highly doubtful. African Americans are predominantly (and traditionally) Democratic voters. CNN exit poll data for both Georgia primaries shows that black voters made up only 2% of the Republican vote as opposed to 51% of the Democratic vote. Again, not welcome news for the McCain camp.
The inclusion of Libertarian Bob Barr and Independent candidate Ralph Nader does not seem to hurt Obama in Georgia, whose electorate base is primarily young, under the age of 45. Obama is also strong among the independent voters, who usually make up much of the undecided vote. On a national level, McCain loses ground to Obama as well when factoring in third party candidates. CNN's Poll of polls has Senator Obama with a 48% to 40% lead at present. A shocking Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll released on June 23 shows Senator Obama with a 49% to 37% lead nationally over Senator McCain.
McCain staffers claim they are not worried, that they are glad Senator Obama is spending money in a state he won't win. Senator McCain jokes, "Senator Obama says that I'm running for Bush's third term. It seems like Barack Obama is running for Jimmy Carter's second."
Senator McCain might not wish to be reminded that native son Jimmy Carter also won the state of Georgia with a little help from third party candidate Ross Perot in 1976.
Sources:
"McCain and Obama Tied in Georgia," SouthernPoliticalReport.com
Andrew Romano, "Georgia On His Mind," Newsweek.com
"Election Center 2008," CNNPolitics.com
"Election Results," CNN.com
"Georgia: McCain vs. Obama," RealClearPolitics.com
"General Election: McCain vs. Obama," RealClearPolitics.com
Published by Saul Relative
WVU graduate, with degrees in History, English, Secondary Education, Computer Programming, and Psychology (and nearly a degree in Political Science). Originally from West Virginia, with stints in Virginia,... View profile
- Will John McCain Choose Sarah Palin as Running Mate? If John McCain chooses Sarah Palin for his running mate, will it help his campaign.
-
Senator John McCain Heroically Grants a Dying Mother Her Final Wish
Senator John McCain helped bring a soldier home from the Marines in time to say goodbye to his dying mother.
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30 Barack Obama (D, IL)spoke to a crowd of would-be caucus-goers in Newton, Iowa at the Newton Senior High School on December 30th, and obliquely rebutted some of the charges being aimed at him by other front-runners in...
- John McCain Flip-Flops Again: Now He Says Donald Rumsfeld was the Worst Defense Se... John McCain proves his willingness to say anything to get nominated yet again. Just a few short months after saying Rumsfeld deserves our respect and gratitude McCain is now trash-talking Rummy.
- New Hampshire Exit Poll Data Explains Victories by Hillary Clinton and John McCain Exit polling data from the New Hampshire Primary indicates that Hillary Clinton was helped by a large turn-out of women on the Democratic side. John McCain was helped by independent voters, garnering one-third of the...
- Barack Obama Outraises John McCain in June
- Senator McCain Vs. Senator Obama: The First Debate
- A Look at the Third and Final Presidential Debate; Senator Obama and Senator McCai...
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- John McCain: He Declared Iraq a Just and Necessary Success While Also Criticizing It
- Triumph for John McCain; Mike Huckabee Concedes; Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton...
- Barack Obama: Fired Up and Ready to Go
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
8 Comments
Post a CommentWell, the long and short of it rests here, Demetria: if people want change, they had best vote for a Democratic president, Democratic senators, and Democratic congressmen. Otherwise, you are going to see a hung-up, filibustered Congress and a president who will only be as effective as the legislation that eventually crosses his desk. As it stands today, the Democrats have only a small majority, just enough for the Republicans to filibuster, not enough to override any presidential veto, and be labeled as "do-nothing." For there to be adequate or even recognizable legislative change in the U.S., one party or the other has got to have a clear voting majority. Neither party has that at present. You want Congress to actually do something, you have to vote a clear majority of one party into Congress. That party at present would be Democratic, unless you want continued corporate deregulation, insufficient governmental funding, a war that's an economy crusher, tax breaks for the wealthy.
This whole election process is about change and that seems to be the undercurrent in every area. Even in terms of things being the way they've always been. I don't just mean because that Obama's buzz word but it just seems to be something carried on the breeze that is informing every apect of the process. I don't put a lot of stock in polls because no one truly knows what goes on once people are in the voting booth. Everyone's heard the jokes about drunk people in voting booth's voting for the wrong people. Things change... no pun.
And it may not be a question of inaccuracies in the polls, either, Tyler. The polls could be accurate when they're conducted. People change their minds. Some who say they would vote for Nader or Barr may come to the realization that they're wasting their vote and then cast it for one of the other candidates. For Obama's sake, he may want to hope that those numbers remain steady...
I suspect Barr's numbers will go down once people get in the voting booth. Nader also polls higher then what he ends up with. I have no idea if there is any shenanigans going on at the polling stations or if it deals with just inaccurate polls.
It seems that several states that have been red states for quite some time have come back into play for this election, Jacob. An analyst on CNN (I forget which, but I'm certain they were an Obama supporter) the other night predicted a landslide victory for Obama and they might be right. However, to put things into perspective, it is only June and the GOP hasn't gotten their collective might centered on Obama just yet. When they do, we'll see then how Obama's numbers stand up...
it would be very interesting if things continue this way, currently NC is a close race as well, a possible 2 blue southern states! great reporting!
Thank you, 3lilangels...
Very nice reporting here, thanks!!!!!