For example in the case files listed on Doe Network -- you'll see a "source information" link near bottom of the file.
If you are submitting a possible match or potential tip, always be sure to do the click through to source data.
Often the primary files are in a constant state of change. The mirrored file on volunteer databases might not have caught up with the latest case revision of the official case file.
In general, it is not the best idea to create new case file mirror from the original. Checking original NamUs.gov / or law enforcement files as the primary sources are usually the best route. Few orgs are able to mirror and manage the mirrored case files well, and Doe Network has been among the best at keeping track. Many of the case found on Doe Network are original to the org as submitted by the actual case owner agencies.
Case file imports into NamUs from other databases like FBI NCIC are often vague in nature. Sometimes the NCIC & local law enforcement case files have complex data that must be vetted, sometimes added to the site in phases. For example dental records are reviewed by forensic odontologists on staff. Any other biometric data is sought out and uploaded.
When NamUs receives core data directly from a law enforcement source, it is (initially) assumed to be the latest information. Then, often NamUs receives additional details from other LE sources that provide an update not noted in initial import. So the case files in NamUs are in a constant state of revision. That is the process of a central repository, to bring all sources together in a universal file.
Some the local, county and state LE agencies are eliminating their own websites that feature case files in favor of using the National Database which is NamUs. This is partly a cost saving advantage as well as an effort to have a single official repository.
As NamUs mines this data and formats for the national database it have found an overwhelming amount of information that often takes a great deal of time to fully review and refine.
The well run non-profit and public operated groups like Doe Network and Peace 4 Missing remain a vital effort to help assure the data is located and reviewed.
Published by Todd Matthews
Todd's calling to be a voice for missing and unidentified persons began when he solved the identity of the "Tent Girl" case, Barbara Hackman-Taylor, after a ten-year journey that ended in 1998. View profile
- Student Loan Groups, DOE Warn Against Lending Act in U.S. HouseIt is feared that by driving most competitors for providing student loans, including virtually all smaller lenders, out of the student loan business, the remaining large lenders, without the check of competition, will...
- National Missing and Unidentified Persons SystemLaunched in July 2007, a national system/database for missing and unidentified persons has become a reality. It will eventually be comprised of two databases.
How YOU Can Help with the Missing & Unidentified NOWIt is possible now to generate county links to the UID's on the NamUs | UDRS database.
US DOJ Launches National Missing and Unidentified Persons InitiativeToday I got an e-mail from Jeannine Willie with Dept of Justice. PRESS RELEASE- Crystal Meth: A Law Enforcement PerspectiveI wrote this article from personal experience as a Narcotics Investigator. It discusses how law enforcement uses new laws to battle the production and use of meth. It also highlights other criminal activity by drug...
- Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst Tips, Cheats, and Hints Part 1
- The Doe Network: Featured Member Jade Melindez
- How the Doe Network Helped Libba Find Her Sister
- Jane and John Doe Cases,amateur Sleuths Who Are Trying to Put Them to Rest
- Nearly 19 Years Later, John Doe Identified
- "Because Every Missing Person, Doe, and Their Families Deserve Closure"
- Missouri Missing Announces June 17th as Official "Missing & Unidentified Persons A...



