This is tiring, watching Hillary Clinton sing, President Bush bang drums, Janet Reno singing, and others "letting loose" to what appears to be a carefully crafted plow to show people around the nation that they are indeed human and can have fun too. What I really want to know is what about Medicare, social security, 2nd amendment rights, constitutional rights, immigrant rights, Federal minimum wage, the economy budget and other factors that shape my every day life, those are the factors that ill make me vote one way or the other, not how well you sing or dance.
Another unmentioned horror is the simple idea that some people are only backing certain candidates because they are either female or of a slightly difference ethnic proportion other that 100% American. While these are unmentionables because of the subject, is it truly happening, there is no way to tell. There is evidence to support both sides of that argument, but the truth of the issue is that since being biased for such reason is such a "taboo" thing that it will never be tackled or dealt with.
Recently the mud slinging has started another round, while some candidates resisted the first round they showed superior intellect and backbone in not participating in the mud slinging that has followed this campaign year. Unfortunately, the candidates that resisted the first round of slinging have given in to the second round and taken up arms against heir aggressors and slung mud back at them. This action has to stop, I do not care about the personal lives of the candidates anymore, and I no longer care about a bad check that they wrote in 1994, I want to hear the important issues. The current hot topics are so controversial that the new campaign has avoided going near these subjects. While it may be politically "safe" to avoid these subjects they are none the less very important to many people and almost everybody's life here within the United States of America.
These sensitive subjects should not be beaten to death as sometimes happens, they should be handled cautiously and stances should be made apparent. Each candidate should state their position and have a damn back bone. If they expect us as a nation to stand up for them they should have to guts to stand up on their own and draw a line in the sand and say this is where I stand and that is where you stand, thats who I am. No contradictions, no hypocrisy , no switching sides. Just draw the line and define ourself from the other candidates or be lost to the idea that people will vote for the "woman" or the "black" person running for office. Stand up for your position, and maybe as a nation well think you have the guts to stand up to represent our nation.
Published by Ashby Koss
I am a continuing student of life. With freedom and non-conformity on my mind. ~Ashby View profile
Clinton/Obama: Breaking the Mold for the 2008 Presidential ElectionWill the Democrats and Republicans pull off the same thing they do every year, putting an average white man on the ballot for President? The Republicans most likely will. howeve...- 2008 Presidential Hopefuls: Senator Sam Brownback's Potential Candidacy for the 20...A look at the potential candidacy of Senator Sam Brownback in the 2008 presidential election.
The Media and the 2004 Presidential ElectionMedia coverage of the 2004 presidential campaign lacked the intensity to encourage voters and provide them with the necessary information to make an informed voting decision.- Election Polls Review: Why the Democratic Nominee Will Win the Presidential ElectionIn the 2008 presidential election, whichever Democrat receives the party's nomination appears to have a better chance of winning than does their Republican rival, as indicated by several Gallup polls conducted since J...
- Presidential Election Survival Guide: Debates, Campaign Commercials and MoreThe presidential election is looming, and this year, has begun earlier than ever before. How do you stay informed without losing your will to vote?
- What Happened After the 2000 Presidential Election
- Hispanic Population Could Play Large Role in 2008 Presidential Election
- The Victoria Woodhull/Frederick Douglass Ticket in the 1872 U.S. Presidential Elec...
- George Pataki and Rudy Giuliani's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential El...
- George Allen's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential Election
- Media Framing of War in the 2004 Presidential Election
- The Effects of Advertising on Young Voters in the 2004 Presidential Election




4 Comments
Post a CommentOnce I had narrowed down the candidates to a manageable bunch, it was easier to check out their voting records. I did not need to check out Hillary Clinton, because I am a Code Pinker and she lost my vote quite some time ago, with her lack of empathy for wives, mothers, sisters, daughters of our troops as well as for wives, mothers, sisters, daughters in Iraq. Bad enough men do not care about babies and children being blown to bits by US bombs, so no thank you Hillary.
Several of the candidates have Senate websites where you can go to check out how they stand on issues, actually that is also listed on the campaign sites I have visited, also. More info found at Legislation Voting Records: ttp://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/legislative_home.htm. Sites like MSN.com and CNN also have pages that compare candidates in easy to follow formats. I personally liked You Tube's You Choose '08. I was quickly able to rule out a lot of candidates based on their first video.
Thanks guys sadly it's just how I feel. I am glad there are atleast some people in America that care for more than a song and dance.
Great Article. Exactly what I've been thinking. It's absurd really. The sad truth is, these ridiculous tactics, and the treatment of the American people as a whole as morons will work. It always does, "to the slaughter" and all, these people just want to be led.