There have been increasing high-profile outbreaks of tainted food with consumer illness in the United States. A strain of salmonella carried in peppers from Mexico sickened 1,400 people from April to August 2007, followed by an E. coli epidemic in 2006 that was traced to California spinach killing three people. Melamine poisoning from Chinese products killed and sickened pets across the nation in 2007. In the summer of 2008, there was a massive recall of tomatoes and a debacle that stretched for months while jalapeno peppers were the culprit.
Salmonella bacteria can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, the elderly or those with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain and usually recover in a few days. In some cases, salmonella infection can result in the organism invading the bloodstream, producing more severe illnesses or death.
The impact of this food crisis reaches pets and wildlife as well. Peanut butter and peanut paste, the main offenders in this crisis, are common ingredients found in pet products.
More than 1,900 products have been recalled in response. It has been claimed that Peanut Corp. of America handles a mere 2.5 percent of all peanuts processed into peanut butter and peanut products. Why is the industry suffering a great reduction in sales as well as a recall for 1900 products? Poor record keeping and tracking could be to blame in a market place filled with hysteria.
An updated recall includes dry and oil roasted peanuts, granulated peanuts, peanut meal, peanut butter and peanut paste. A recent Harvard study found that 93 percent of respondents knew about the peanut butter recall, but fewer than half knew that some cakes, snack bars, cookies and brownies also were recalled. The prevalence of peanut and peanut products to boost protein and taste is more common than you might think.
The Food and Drug Administration is under fire once again for neglect regarding manufacturing inspections. The FDA failed to recheck the Peanut Corporation's Blakely, Georgia manufacturing site after an inspection in 2001 showed multiple health violations. The Peanut Corporation facility in Plainview, Texas operated as unlicensed and uninspected for nearly four years. The Peanut Corporation, recently filing for bankruptcy, has recently been linked to criminal conduct in the processing of peanut products.
The FDA, generally considered as the chief inspector for the nation, is routinely capable of basic checks for about 1 per cent of the American food supply. This has posed a particular problem for imported food brought into the United States. The FDA admits to being in a state of crisis. Government reform has not worked well for government agencies in the past and FDA funding has been slow in coming. The nation's food system is in need of a complete overhaul to insure the safety of the American food supply. Companies like Peanut Corporation of America are more concerned about the corporate bottom line than public health. With that in mind, food producers and manufacturers cannot be trusted to provide safe food to consumers without real compliance and supervision. The recent economic downturn is the direct result of a corporate financial crisis that has fully demonstrated the moral bankruptcy of Corporate America. How can any confidence exist in a food safety system that doesn't work? Has food safety become an outdated notion?
Published by E. Manning
E. Manning knows that reality is more than what is seen. He is a writer, researcher and historical analyst living in Nashville, Tennessee. View profile
The Practicability of Educational Television in the PhilippinesIn any culture, entertainment is the most influential of forces. Television is a form of entertainment, and thus, it has educational properties. Perhaps a little more pushing fo...- How Dog Sleds Averted an Epidemic in Nome In January 1925, a diphtheria epidemic swept through Nome, Alaska. Cut off from the world by Arctic weather, the only way to save the town was to send precious anti-toxin serum 674 miles through blizzards, gales, and...
- Legalized Discrimination: Weight Discrimination in the United StatesThis paper reviews the issue of weight discrimination and its relationship to organizations.
- As Oil Majors Chime In, the Reality of Peak Oil Lurches CloserOne by one, the world's oil companies are coming out of the closet.
- Fahrenheit 451: The Threat of Knowledge in AmericaMass exploitation is found in the novel, Fahrenheit 451, and in our modern society. Is knowledge a threat?
- On the Question of National Healthcare and Insurance in the United States
- Food Irradiation: The Truth
- The Morality of Cloning
- An Critical Philosophical Examination of the Road to War in Iraq
- The (Almost Literally) Complete Guide to Bartending and Serving
- A Must-Read for the Prospective Home Biodiesel Maker
- Consumer or Privately Driven; Who Benefits from the EU Moratorium on Genetically M...




2 Comments
Post a CommentVery good article. Senate Bill S510 was just passed for this very specific purpose. You can read more about it here: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6079970/what_is_the_hype_about_bill_s510.html?cat=3
Mr. Manning is right that there is a need to overhaul the nation's food supply, but the answer is not in more federal regulation or, necessarily, increased funding and adminstrative reorganization. He notes that the FDA is aware of its own critical failings and that the bottom line policies of corporate America are morally misguided (if not corrupt). I doubt if a re-organization of a federal agency will address the scope of the issue, and new laws will not make corporate American more moral. I would argue that the global system of food production and distribution is what we need to change. Aside from agribusiness's dependence on non-sustainable energy systems, its tendency to exploit workers, and over-tax the environment, the quality of food (including its nutritional value) has continued to decline. In part, this is the result of no real accountability for the agribusiness industry to the consumer who rarely knows from where or how his or her food was produced. Yet, at the same time,