Dangers of Aversive Training Methods

Kindness Counts

Diane Garrod
Working with aggression daily, it is very clear to me aversive methods create fearful dogs, and they learn helplessness not how to thrive. Bonds and relationships deteriorate. Aggressive dogs are aggressive for a reason. It has little to do with typical verbiage touting dominance. A recent study says it better.

Aggression begets aggression, according to a new year-long veterinary study published by University of Pennsylvania researchers, Journal of Applied Animal Behavior (February 2009). Positive reward-based trainers, such as myself, have known what the study proves all along. Now there is scientific credibility and proof.

Lead author Meghan Herron, DVM, University of Ohio, says "Nationwide, the number-one reason why dog owners take their dog to a veterinary behaviorist is to manage aggressive behavior. Our study demonstrated that many confrontational training methods, whether staring down dogs, striking them or intimidating them with physical manipulation, do little to correct improper behavior and can elicit aggressive responses."

Often, the confusion a dog gets from constant confrontational interaction with an owner, causes confusion, anxiety, anger and learned helplessness. Although the study is recent, 2009, it is not new. Pierce and Cheney, 2004, stated "Adverse punishment causes aversive stimulation, defined as anything a dog would do to escape or avoid and is commonly described as painful, noxious or unpleasant.

Further, Chance, 2003 as referenced in Aggressive Behavior in Dogs by James O'Heare states using adverse punishment appears to have effect, but can cause problematic fallout or secondary effects. This fallout results in other bad behaviors from self-mutilation to anxieties and unreliable interactions. This means be prepared for other bad habits to replace the ones punished and often resulting in increased behaviors of reactivity, fear and aggression rather than diminished response.

The effects of adverse punishment is fallout according to Coercion and its Fallout, Sidman 2001. Sidman states "Coercion is defined as the use of punishment and the threat of punishment to get others to act as we would like and involves the basic contingencies of punishment and negative reinforcement."

Behaviors I see run the gamut from redirected aggression to territorial aggression to dog and human aggression. Often, these are due to a lack of proper socialization, a traumatic experience and even genetic responses misinterpreted. Whatever the reason, in my experience, there is never a reason to pair aggression with aggression. It is so important to understand if a dog is aggressive, reactive to the environment or shy/fearful they need to re-learn how to respond to their triggers and stimuli. A dog cannot be in an agitated state to learn, but must be in a relaxed state to begin to process information and re-learn what to do when they are confronted with their triggers.

Herron said, "Studies on canine aggression in the last decade have shown that canine aggression and other behavior problems are not a result of dominant behavior or the lack of the owner's alpha status, but rather a result of fear (self-defense) or underlying anxiety problems."

Another effect is learned helplessness discussed in Pierce and Cheney 2004. The dog learns to become almost robotic in nature and holds anxiety, stress inside to the point they are afraid to do anything for fear of repercussion. I've seen dogs literally shut down and sit in the middle of a yard, for instance, when electrical fences were in use, or stop and freeze when an electrical shock collar or even a muzzle was put on or lose valuable communication skills when a bark collar was used. Learned helplessness can lead to self-mutilation, excessive barking, nervousness, or depressed shutdown.

Positive reward-based training never uses pain devices. It takes a systematic approach, might take a bit longer, but has long lasting results and fallout is a simple increase in confidence. An increased confidence and clear, concise training in a positive environment is a good result. Making sure consistency is achieved as the dog begins to trust is key to changing behavior. Avoid the dangers of aversive training means learning what positive reward-based training is all about from the many experts on the subject available on local book shelves. This takes away all the confusion about training methods and creates a pathway of instruction the dog doesn't need to use aggression to obtain or escape an unpleasant trigger.

Published by Diane Garrod

Graduate UW-Oshkosh, BS Communication, minor in Journalism. Lives on Whidbey Island, north of Seattle, Washington in Langley "Village By the Sea". Resides with husband, two Belgian Tervurens and two parrots....  View profile

  • An effect of aversive training is learned helplessness, Pierce and Cheney 2004.
  • Aggression begets aggression according to a study by University of Pennsylvania researchers.
  • Adverse punishment causes aversive stimulation according to Pierce and Cheney 2004.
Studies on canine aggression in the last decade show canine aggression is not a result of dominant behavior or the lack of the owner's alpha status, but rather a result of fear (self-defense) or underlying anxiety problems.

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sharon Annette McCuddy1/20/2011

    Dominance and Confidence are two entirely different traits. While usually a dominant dog is also confident, I have seen dominant dogs that are not confident - and it is evident in the way they approach being dominant. I also had the privilege of fostering a particular dog that was very confident - but not dominant.

    Let's not confuse these terms.

  • Patty10/3/2010

    "and are on television" Really? I have NEVER seen these people on tv. ALL of the trainers I have talked to or seen have used or say dominace exists. For example Victoria Stillwell has dominance in her show. I have worked probably with more aggressive dogs than in your life time. So stop telling me what I am doing wrong. Each method people use is going to be differnt.

    Think of a wall mount phone compared to a cell phone. The cell phone has the capablity to take pictures, be on the interent, and talk on the phone. Now compare a e collar with a clicker. The e collar gives a tap that means pay attention, (the tap meaning getting there attention the same way you would tap a person to get there attention, NOT causeing emotional or physical stress) or the clicker that says hey look let me bribe you with food. Which one is more limiting? Wall mount phone or cell phone. E collar or clicker (bribery).

  • Diane Garrod10/3/2010

    continuing....animals would have a better overall veterinary experience. Other veterinary experts like Dr. Marty Becker DVM, Dr. Nicholas Dodson and Dr. Jean Dodds write articles, books and are on television all advocates of positive methods even in a vet clinic setting. Where knowledge ends aversion begins. Kindness does count and positive does not mean permissive.

  • Diane Garrod10/3/2010

    Patty better look at your own misspellings throughout your post. This is not a debate about experience and just because one has experience using aversive methods doesn't make it right. How can a confident dog look like an "asshole" as you put it? What does dominant mean anyway? I work with aggressive dogs daily and dominance is a human attributed trait. Dogs can be fearful, and may even have a need to obtain, and they can intend to do harm if fear turns to anger or if the dog has a history of behavior that has worked. Dogs learn by association and consequence. They are not trying to take over the world or a household or the vet clinic by being dominant. This method does not fail and quite the contrary. If your proof is working in a vet clinic, the training uses restraints and confrontation. For animal control, vet clinics, and for shelters at times this is necessary depending on the situation. However,if vet clinics were to learn other methods such as Dr. Sophia Yin's DVM research an

  • Patty10/2/2010

    @Diane
    The point that you can't get my name right tell me you skim through things and don't look closley therefore haveing a skewed prescption of this topic. Using my 20 years of dog training give me more experencince then what you have. Also working in a vet clinic and seeing how positive training efficts the dog (more confident) makes the dog look like an asshole. There is nothing wrong with a confident dog but if one is too confidnet (dominate) this method is sure to fail.

  • Diane Garrod9/29/2010

    AC - what exactly is "a load of crap?" Can you be more specific? A whole article, filled with studies done by reputable people cannot be deemed nonsense. Also having used aversive methods myself early on and the difference in NOT using them for sixteen years now speaks for itself. If you are going to make a statement like this, please back it up. Thanks.

  • Patty9/28/2010

    This is a load of crap!

  • AC Jelena9/24/2010

    You're featured in the Pets category!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.