Dark Energy Wins $500,000 2007 Gruber Cosmology Prize
Revolutionary Accelerating Universe Discovery Wins Prize
The Berkeley Lab press release says the teams were located in California and Australia and were headed by Saul Perlmutter (University of California at Berkeley) and Brian Schmidt (Australian National University). The tool the teams used for measuring the expansion of the universe was the same. And the search to confirm the accepted theory that gravity would slow and possibly reverse the expansion was the same. But they were in a break-neck competition against one another to gather proof for a decelerating expansion of the universe.
Instead of confirming what science had established as accepted cosmology, both teams--simultaneously--announced a surprise revolutionary new discovery in 1998: The expansion of the universe is accelerating. Brian Boyle, who is now Director of the Australian Telescope National Facility, was then a member of Saul Perlmutter's team and his comment upon becoming a joint recipient of the Gruber Cosmology Prize was: "We set out to refine conventional wisdom. But instead, we overthrew it," as reported in a Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Researdh Organization (CSIRO) media release.
Now, the Gruber Foundation is honoring the two teams who simultaneously made the cosmological breakthrough that was announced in 1998. The award is being made because, in the words of the Gruber Foundation, "Their discovery led to the idea of an expansion force, dubbed dark energy. And it suggested that the fate of the universe is to just keep expanding, faster and faster." The Prize money of $500,000 will be split between Perlmutter and Schmidt and the teams which they led: the Supernova Cosmology Project headed by Perlmutter and the High-z Supernova Search Team headed by Brian Schmidt.
Dark energy is defined by Dr. Jerome Drexler, noted inventor of laser technology and cosmology author and founder of LaserCard Corporation, as a "hypothetical form of energy assumed to permeate all space and to have negative pressure resulting in repulsion gravitational force." Scientific work on dark energy has continued and modifications to the theory of its nature are being proposed. For instance, physicist and cosmologist Michael Turner of Chicago University has said that despite not having a clue as to what dark energy is, he theorizes that dark energy, which is diffuse, is probably not found in galaxies or even in clusters of galaxies, but beyond such clusters.
The Berkeley Lab of the Univesiry of California at Berkeley says that dark energy is believed to constitute approximately three-quarters of the density of the universe, with dark matter, which was recently mapped, constituting the majority of the rest. Matter takes up surprisingly little space. Dark energy, which "stretches space and works against the mutual gravitational attraction of ordinary matter and energy," was discovered when an idea for measuring the expansion of the universe first suggested in the 1930s was implemented by the two supernova teams.
Type Ia supernovae, which modern technology proved to be highly dependable "standard candles," were located using new telescope techniques facilitating time-span analysis of multiple galaxies. These dependable standard candles--points of light that lend themselves to competent calculations of distance relative to brightness--permitted a plot graph to be made of distances and rates and directions of travel of supernovae of the Ia type by using these supernovae Ia "explosions.at different distances to track the size of the Universe at different times, and hence how its rate of acceleration had changed over time," as stated in the media release from the CSIRO.
Perlmutter team member physicist Gerson Goldhaber recalls for Berkeley Lab: "I was amazed when I looked at the graph we had just drawn. We had set out to measure the deceleration of the universe, and found it was accelerating. This was one of the eureka moments...."
Now: What is dark energy? Is it what Dr. Drexler suggests: Is it synchrotron radiation from relativistic protons of dark matter moving across extragalactic magnetic fields? Stay tuned....
Paul Preuss, "Gruber Cosmology Prize Awarded to Discoverers of Dark Energy." Berkely Lab Press Release. URL: http://www.interactions.org/cms/?pid=1025300
Published by K.L. Hartwig
A retired stockbroker, I am in e-education, tutoring in English Literature and Language and studying for an M.A. in English Linguistics. View profile
- "Dark Energy" Will Cause Our Universe to Expand ForeverCurrent laws of physics do not account for what is really going on with our Universe.
- The Mystery of Dark EnergyEver imagined what the 'empty space' of the universe is made up of or what are the reasons behind ever expanding universe?
The Dark Side of the UniverseDark Energy and Matter are the same thing, except one is unseen and undetected energy that joins with the Dark Matter in acting as a cohesive force in galaxies. It is not Star...
- $500,000 Prize Awarded for the 2007 Gruber Prize for Genetics
- Will Dark Energy Cause the End of the Universe?
- "Dark" Energy and Matter May Be Key to Understanding the Universe
- Dark Energy; As Believable as Invisible Oceans?
- Dark Energy Discovery Rivals Current Physics Theories
- The Connection Among the Void in the Universe, Dark Energy and the Big Bang
- Dark Energy and Matter
- news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070108-dark-matter.html Dark matter (different from dark energy) is mapped.
- 2007 Gruber Cosmology Prize goes to Perlmutter and Schmidt and their teams.
- They are rewarded for their 1998 discovery of gravitationally repulsive dark energy.
- The $500,000 Prize will be shared between the two research teams.





6 Comments
Post a CommentYes, the coffee is a very good question. It's dark matter, right? Very good article too.
hmm, very interesting...I like Doc's idea about that refillable coffee..LOL
Why doesn't coffee expand to fill my mug so I don't have to keep getting up from my desk in the morning?
Halina, anti-electrons are positrons - same mass but opposite charge from that of electrons. When matter and antimatter (of the same "family") collide, they turn into energy. So when an electron collides with a positron, you get two photons of 0.511 MeV energy apiece.
A proton does have a charge opposite that of an electron, but it is much more massive - almost 2000 times more massive. Protons are also matter, not antimatter. The opposite of a proton is (drum roll please...) an anti-proton! (Betcha didn't see that one coming!) When a proton collides with an antiproton, you get energy, of about two times 940 MeV.
When a proton collides with an electron, however, you get... hydrogen! The proton is the nucleus of the hydrogen, and the elctron goes around it, often depicted as an orbit around the nucleus but it's more of a fuzzy cloud. We won't go there. :)
Really nice article. Thanks for explaining the measurement they used.
One correction: 'Chicago University' is The University of Chicago. As usual, good science writing here.
Nice article here! I think we had those relativistic protons at my old lab (Argonne)- I think we just called them antielectrons....
Good job with the article- I always get to learn something when I read your stuff.