Darwin's Quotes: Not Survival of the Fittest?
On Charles Darwin's 200th Birthday, His Words Are Cast in Doubt
Apparently, we are learning at the time of Charles Darwin's 200th birthday that Charles Darwin may have been misquoted. Survival of Charles Darwin's fittest words may not be accurate.
Agence France-Presse (AFP) is a global news service that is, among other mediam, raising questions about Charles Darwin quotations.
Cambridge professor and Darwin scholar John van Wyhe told AFP: "His writings can be quite hard going. Often you have to read a whole chapter to know what he is talking about." In other words, Charles Darwin wasn't very good at natural selection in his choice of words.
This brings into question the most famous Charles Darwin quote: "It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change." Sometimes it is slightly reworded as follows: "In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment."
Scholars say not only that they don't find those words in Darwin's compiled works, but that they distort Darwin's ideas. Wyhe states: "These pithy little sayings try to encapsulate Darwin. Unfortunately all of them are actually rather wrong."
Outright wrong? Wyhe continues that among the species that survive, actually "it is the ones that are lucky, or already have the right features that can be passed on to the next generation."
So, it seems, you and me are here not because we were so special to survive, but because we were lucky. Hmmm . . .
Wyhe continues on his rant: "Darwin is particularly likely to get these false citations. Everyone has heard of him, but almost no one has read him." Awww, c'mon Professor Wyhe, you're the one who just told us that it's virtually impossible to comprehend the writings of Charles Darwin. But if we wish to tackle such an apparent headache, we can visit www.darwin-online.org.uk.
May the fittest of the scholars survive. The rest of us are simply confused.
Here on the 200th birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin, it just might be more simple to be a Lincoln scholar. The Gettysburg Address was only 272 words.
SOURCES
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gVRaslqqhXt4uwqsBNXRKib6fAQw
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/history/2009/02/12/some-christians-protest-darwins-birthday-is-their-antagonism-misplaced.html
Published by Michael Thompson
Michael Thompson is a retired newspaper reporter who lives in Saginaw, Michigan. Main topics are political and social justice issues, with occasional escapism into sports and so forth. View profile
- Darwin and the Bell CurveThe Bell Curve, published in 1994, is perhaps one of the most controversial books of all time. Written by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, the book uses empirical statistical analysis to reach conclusion of inte...
- Charles Darwin: Breaking the Beliefs of GenerationsAn overview of the life and achivments of Charles Darwin.
- Planned 2009 Lincoln Bicentennial Events in IllinoisA preliminary schedule has been released with planned events to mark Abraham Lincoln's 200th birthday...with more to come.
- Charles Darwin and Social DarwinismCharles Darwin vs Herbert Spencer
- Top Places to Celebrate Abraham Lincoln's 200th BirthdayAbraham Lincoln is included in almost everyone's list of Great American Presidents. You can enjoy the celebration of his 200th birthday and learn a little American history at any of these spots.
- Social Darwinism: Naturalist Approach or Fallacy?
- Biography of Charles Darwin
- Charles Darwin and Natural Selection
- Charles Darwin and The Origin of Species
- Darwin Day, Dodos, Intelligent Design and Deity
- Charles Darwin Questioned
- An Analysis of The Theory of Evolution and Religion by Charles Darwin




2 Comments
Post a CommentThis is crap!
Screw "survival of the fittest" because it doesn't even apply to life today!
Humans aren't "survival of the fittest", their "destroy everything else so that we can live in the world we want to live in".
Without nature, they wouldn't even be here!
Excellent article! LOL at your last statement. :-)