In the past dating actually did not exist. Instead of taking someone out on a date, a male caller came to the female's house to sit and discuss topics with her and her family. More likely than not, the parents, or whoever was in charge of these young adults, would choose their life mate for them. The daughter's parents also had the power to decline any male caller they did not see fit for marrying their daughter. This type of relationship was the standard for the day, and the decision on the man the woman would wed, would be based on more material reasons than love. Reasons like financial aspects of the parties, political status, religious views, or family heritage. Love seemingly, was only considered in certain circumstances.
Today, this type of relationship is almost non-existent. However, when a relationship reaches a certain level, sit-downs with parents and gaining valuable experiences and lessons through them, are not uncommon. I have been dating my girlfriend for almost a year and a half and in that time I have developed a personal relationship with her entire family and her with mine. I feel it is necessary for someone to develop a strong relationship with their partner's family because it makes the entire relationship easier on the couple.
"From Front Porch to Back Seat: A History of the Date," an article written by Beth Bailey explaining the evolution of dating, shows how each generation had their set values for relationships. After the "male-calling era," finally came the origination of the date. "Dating, which emerged from working class urban culture, became a key ritual of youth culture in the 1920s and was unquestionably the dominant form of 'courtship' by the beginning of World War II" (370). Dating was based on the popularity of the female and material possessions of the male (370). A teen girl was considered "popular" if they were seen with multiple partners and were considered unpopular if they were seen with only one (a basis revealing that one was not adequate enough in certain categories to be seen with more than one boy) (371)."
The term promiscuity would be what that system would be referred to as today, but with more unkind words. Young adults today do have promiscuous attitudes towards sexual relationships and what not, but most feel it necessary to play hard to get. A method founded on the principle of two sayings: "Less is more" and "You always want what you can not have." Others, who find the reckless attitude straining and difficult, or those who find comfort in a partner, choose to exclusively date a single person and look for love. The dating experience of the pre-World War II era and the famous "necking-grounds" invented by Lewis B. Simon in 1930 can be found in society today very easily, but what a girl would be considered popular for back then, she would attain another label today.
Bailey also shows the relevance of magazine articles on dating in the past and how young females used these clippings for advice on boys, sex and relationships (371). An excerpt from Mademoiselle's college issue in 1938 shows what young adult females were thinking back then: "She must be attractive if she can rate all that attention" (371). Advice such as this was dished out in various publications at the time and was a mainstay for young women.
The World Wide Web is this generation's magazine article. By simply typing the word dating into a search engine, a person can come across thousands upon thousands of results ranging from dating tips, to experiences, to the new fad: E-Dating. E-Dating is signing up for an on line web site and having your personality matched with the most compatible partner. It is the simple way of cutting out the small talk and the ever long search for that perfect person and sets you up with your "dream date." Although these sites are not fool proof and not everyone finds that connection they were looking for. Basically, the Web is an advanced form of what young adults were reading in magazines in the 1930s.
"Get Your Hand Out of My Pocket," by Darryl James outlines his views on one of the most debatable dating topics today: Who pays. To him, he wants a clear cut outline before he goes out on the date of what is going on: "Being single and dating gets rough enough without all the confusion of financial expectations" (377). James has no problem paying, as long as he knows upfront. Referring back to Bailey's article, she states that after World War II when going steady became popular the boy had to pay for the girl when they went out but "the girl had to help her boyfriend save up for big events by budgeting 'their' money, even if it meant sitting home together" (372). Going steady referred to seeing exclusively one partner and showing they were now a couple by certain tokens, such as a class ring or varsity jacket.
So who pays in today's society? Sueann Allen writes an interesting article and touches on the subject in "Dating Rules-Keys to Success or Outdated Customs?" She sides with James, stating "you need to know the rules first" (Dating Rules). Allen also believes that letting the man pay for the date allows him to "showoff" and gives him the "upper hand," exactly what the women do not want (Rules). She claims that her rules will help women who are nervous and do not know what to do on dates and make them more confident and give them an advantage (Rules).
I do not believe that dating is about having an advantage. Although, I am biased in the matter for I have only dated one girl in the past twenty months. Before I would have agreed with Allen on the matter, especially when you are first dating, who ever has the most control on the dates usually controls the relationship. Now, after awhile I realize dates are about having fun and being with the single person you love being with more than anything in the world. It is not about who is winning or in control, but all in the experience.
As Bailey moves along in her article, she states at the conclusion that there is no uniform way of dating like there has been in the past (373). She understands that young adults today are not certainly promiscuous or exclusive but somewhere in between or in a transition stage. Irene Yarkoni wrote a brief article on a web page titled "Dating Trends" and it shows how the dating game has changed, almost the same way as Bailey. Yarkoni believes that men are now becoming the hunted by the women, instead of the women being pursued by the men (Trends). She also states that we have noticed "confusion in gender roles" and that "women have been showing drive and initiative...and as a result, men have taken a more passive role" (Trends).
I do not necessarily agree with either of them on this point. I do think women have become more influential in dating but men have not taken a back seat to them. It has become more common though for a woman to ask out a man than it has been in the decades past.
With all the evidence shown it is clear to see that our generation has taken a piece of advice from all of the generations preceding us. We have a taken the best chapter out of all the books on dating and combined it into one distinct, cumulative way of dating. We do not specifically go by the rules on all subjects but modify the way we date to our fitting. The way we date today is not indescribable, but rather very comprehensible. Dating today is a collection of the forms of dating past. This cumulative dating practice takes away the disadvantages and reinforces the advantages of all the past dating ways.
WORKS CITED
Allen, Sueann. "Dating Rules-Keys to Success of Outdated Customs." Top Ten Reviews.
Bailey, Beth. "From Front Porch to Back Seat: A History of the Date." Miller, Robert K. The Informed Argument. 7th ed. Boston: Thomas Wadsworth, 2007.
James, Darryl. "Get Your Hand Out of My Pocket." Miller, Robert K. The Informed Argument. 7th ed. Boston: Thomas Wadsworth, 2007.
Yarkoni, Irene. "Dating Trends." The Single Option: Your Dating Guide. 13 Mar 2007.
Published by Jim Kelly
Graduated cum laude in 2010 with degrees in Political Science, Law and Justice, and Liberal Studies with a concentration in International Studies. I enjoy sports, books, politics, and entertainment. View profile
- The Trials and Tribulations of Germans After World War II (1945 - 1949)The Big Three, the U S, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union worked together for years with one common goal in mind: defeating Nazi Germany. In February of 1945, these Ally forces met at Yalta for the second of three...
- My Favorite Classic World War II FilmsA list of some of my favorite films set during and after World War II.
Pearl Harbor World War II RememberedThe story of the USS Kidd, a World War II destroyer, told using excerpts from one sailor's wartime journal.- A History of England's Attitude Towards the United States from World War I to Worl...This paper details the global changes caused by World War I and II. It looks specifically at England and the United States, and it uses exclusively the editorials found in the English publication "The Spectator."
Legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen from World War IIDuring World War II, the Tuskegee Airmen fought on the front lines of the air war as well as the front lines of race relations. The legacy of these pilots is discussed in Los A...
- Ten Films to Teach World War II in the Social Studies Classroom
- World War II Descriptive Timeline
- Defiance with Daniel Craig an Outstanding World War II Movie on DVD
- World War II, International Institutions and Cold War Politics
- The French Resistance in World War II
- African-American Soldiers' Roles in World War II
- The Outfit: Defeat the Nazis and Win World War II!



