Some students at Naperville Central High School wore t-shirts with messages such as "Jesus was str8", "Be happy not gay", and "I do not support gay day". Some students were told they had to remove these shirts because of the messages on them. Forcing students who wear shirts like this to remove them doesn't seem fair. Why should students be allowed to participate in the day by not speaking while others cannot voice their opinion? At nearby Neuqua Valley High School, Heidi Zamecnik recently decided to sue the school for stopping her from wearing a shirt with the message "Be Happy, Not Gay" after last year's Day of Silence. Free speech should allow students to demonstrate their opinions no matter what they are.
School administrators should not allow one group to express their opinions while silencing the other side. If they are going to prevent either side from expressing their opinions they must stop both. This issue of protests in schools was addressed in the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines School District, about a group of students who were suspended for wearing armbands to school to show they didn't support the Vietnam War. The ruling in that case was that a school cannot ban a form of protest or expression to avoid controversy unless it disrupts the school day. Being silent during the day obviously makes it harder for education to continue as usual, yet the school has allowed the Day of Silence for a few years. Wearing a t-shirt with a debatable message on it however is not as obviously disruptive.
The schools will have to make a choice quickly about whether they will allow all sides to express their opinions, or if they will stop allowing students to express their opinions on issues important to them. They will not be able to continue as they have been; only allowing one side to demonstrate.
Published by Kyle
I am a real estate investor in Indiana. I have several units which I rent out. I am also a student at Indiana University, studying accounting, real estate, and sociology. View profile
- What Free Speech is NotRecalling his attendance at a conference of purported experts from academia, media, and government, G. Stolyarov II makes the argument that these elites have absolutely no idea what free speech is and why it is signif...
- Free Speech and ResponsibilityThere has been a lot of talk lately about free speech and racism, from the Don Imus story to rap and hip-hop lyrics. We have seen Imus fired, after the public outcry at his remarks, and some in the rap music industry...
Gay Rights Groups Should Leave Tony Dungy AloneGay rights groups are upset at Tony Dungy for speaking at an event sponsored by a group against gay marriage. These gay rights groups should pick on somebody else.- Protests, Debates in Free Speech Zone Bring Politics to Georgia TechGeorgia Tech's traditionally apolitical student body is becoming more socially and politically aware. Loud and passionate demonstrations and protests occur in "free speech zone."
- Reasons for Recent Gay Rights Advancements in the USA Overview of reasons for gay rights advancement in the USA since 1990
- When Free Speech Turns Ugly
- Michael Savage's Free Speech Fight!
- Labor Day Weekend Last Fling in Naperville
- Free Speech, Children, & the First Amendment
- Analyzing the Language of Free Speech Policies
- National Security Vs Free Speech: An Ethics Argument
- Gay Rights: A Moral Travesty, or a Human Rights Issue?

