The main advantages of democracy are three. First, in this form of Government people enjoy a great deal of liberty. They get every freedom for self-expression. They can criticize the Government through the press and the platform. The Government can be dismissed at the will of the people. In such a Government, people are all-powerful. It is they who make and dismiss it. In England, Sir Winston Churchill won the Second World War and became the war-time hero. But after the war he and his Government were dismissed. Secondly, in democracy all the citizens are treated as equals. No distinction is made on the basis of caste, creed or sex. All the citizens get equal opportunity. Even a sweeper can become the President. Thirdly, democracy is best suited for a country in peace times. Sound foundations of a nation are laid through it. Everything great is achieved through the cooperation of the people. Co-operation of the people is its basic principle.
Democracy also has some disadvantages. It is a very slow moving form of Government. For everything, first of all some legislation has to be passed. It takes a pretty long time before the Government comes to any decision. Moreover, it also lacks in secrecy. Its machinery is very complicated. It runs through a long chain of officers and their staff. Thus, every order has to pass through so many hands before it can be executed. So it is said that it can never be successful in war times. Further, its success or failure depends on the voter. If the voters are educated and enlightened, then only will they vote to elect capable men. If they are ignorant they will vote for undesirable persons. Thus, democracy depends upon the voters.
Dictatorship has its own advantages. In war-time, no other Government is as efficient as dictatorship. The dictator is the master of his own will. His orders are the final orders. No one can dare refuse to carry them out. When a nation is down trodden a dictator certainly helps it in rising high. Through heavy penalties and punishments, he frees the country of all corruption. In Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq, Burma, etc., there were dictators.
But dictatorship cannot last long. It is very difficult to get a good successor to a dictator. Einstein, the famous scientist, once said, "Dictators of genius are succeeded by scoundrels". Germany became a terror to the world in the days of Hitler. Turkey was revolutionized and modernized by Mustafa Kamala Pasha. But after them, their countries again fell in darkness. Further, as the dictator rules according to his whims, so the country always faces the danger of going on a wrong path. There is no cheek on his powers. People cannot criticize him or change the Government through constitutional means. They cannot express their views freely or pass their life in the way they think best. They have no rights. They must obey the dictator blindly. Man is thus reduced to the level of a dumb animal. These are some of the greatest defects of dictatorship.
Keeping all the above advantages and disadvantages of democracy and dictatorship in mind, we can say that democracy leads to the development of the individual as well as of society. It is in this form of Government that the individual liberties and rights are highly respected. People are not made to follow the Government like sheep and goats. That is why the present dictators take pleasure in calling their dictatorship people's democracies. In recent times there has been turmoil all over Eastern Europe with thousands and thousands of people demanding democratic reforms, and fair and free elections on the basis of a multiparty system. Dictatorships in many of these countries have been replaced by democracies. All progressive countries want to follow the path of democracy. It is the highest form of civilized Government.
Source: Articles published in India Today Magazine in November 2008 by R.Martin
Published by ©Kamaal Nishant©
©Kamaal Nishant© is a freelance writer, poet, novelist and professional dreamer, but then again, aren't we all sometimes? erebers@koolkamaal.com View profile
- What Type of Government Should Be Created in Iraq? a letter to Iraq on what type of government should be set up to make all ethnic and nationalities happy
-
An Analysis of the American Jury System
This article will examine the role of juries in capital punishment cases and conclude that the jury system needs to be restructured. Advantages, disadvantages, specific court ca...
- Democratic Systems of Government We all know that the systems of government can be classified in two big categories: the democratic systems of government and the non-democratic systems of government.
- The Rights and Responsibilities of Government A rebuttal of the idea that democracy can only function if God is the ultimate authority, with some historical corrections.
- The Far Right has Created a Dictatorship: We Must Stand Against This "New World Or...
- How to Establish a Dictatorship
- The Absolute Regime is a True Form of Government
- Advantages and Disadvantages of a Philosopher-King State
- Analysis of Machiavelli, Jefferson, and Nietzsche 's View of Government
- The Pros and Cons of Multicultural Education
- Bitchocracy and Other Alternative Forms of Government
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
19 Comments
Post a CommentReal democracy is still an unattainable ideal, and even then, there is no system in the world as a basis, rule or sense of comparison for evaluation of full and genuine democracy, and neither can exist, because we have to get on their essence and see who benefits. For the ancient Greek aristocracy existed broader "democracy", but for the slaves, the oppressed, the downtrodden, the destitute, the disenfranchised and excluded (which were the absolute majority), democracy was only an empty word.
The political organization, or government of the people, by the people and for the people, which is founded on popular sovereignty, and the balanced distribution of power, that to strengthen the process of democracy, has to act on a continuous and diligent in order to achieve an outcome that benefits or take into account the real interests of the majority. And again, can not be safeguarded in the first place, preserving, securing or guaranteeing all costs the political domain of a privi
this essay solved my big problem, so in my opinions this is best.....thanx!!!
thanks so much but it was a little 1 sided i agree with the other peoplebut it still helped (:
___
(_/) <{' . '}>___ c(* _ *)o
('.'<) { { { { { }o //| |\
c( UU) || || || || ~O |_'_|9O~
cUcU cU cU '''' || || ''''
0 0
thank u very much
dis helped me in debate. thank u so much.
you wrote very well, thankyou. :)
thanks so much, its nice to have all this information at the press of a button. Thank you for taking your time to help everybody with their essay's and things :)
it was such a nice article it hepled me to complete my h.hw so thank yoooooooooooou to the person who wrote this article
How are they alike? How are they different? You cover the different well but the comparison stops there... need more information. Thanks for the start
ya id say also that this is more one sided going towards democracy but id say we need dictatorship its a lot better look at where we are with this obama black pres no where america isnt strick we let anyone do anything we even now have a black president whats up with that