Democrat Congressman Keith Ellison Wants National Border to Become Irrelevant

So can it possibly be true that a progressive politician might be working to undermine the sovereignty of this nation? You're kidding, right? That can't be, can it? It can be and it in fact is. Minnesota Democrat Keith Ellison made clear he thinks American national borders are an "irrelevancy." Don't ya love it when American politicians work to destroy the nation as Founded?

Mr Ellison is a special case. He is a Muslim ya know, so PC demands I cannot say anything negative about him whatsoever. Well, that's if I gave a rat's ass for the demands of progressive PC nonsense, which clearly cows me to silence. As if.

Mr Ellison's comments came in June 2010. They were part of a larger mosaic whereby Ellison decries US military power and argues "policies of "equity, generosity, and engagement" provide security." Blatherskite!

Again I ask, do nations the world over not guard their borders by men with guns? If it is something every nation does, clearly there must be some sound reason for it, although to Congressman Ellison, whatever the reason it is, it's an antiquated one. I beg to differ Sir.

I guard my home not by being equitable, generous or engaged. I guard it by being vigilant, determined and absolutely medieval in resolve. What goes on up and down the block is meaningless to me, but let it spill onto my property and now one has my attention. Let it proceed further to landing on my stoop and there will be Hell unleashed. Equity and generosity have nothing to do with it, but indeed it will make me become engaged, but not in the way Mr Ellison forwards.

What is behind such concepts as Mr. Ellison forwards? Simply put it's that "one world, one nation" concept that demands to be progressive we must become one world. That's progress? That's insane Utopian dreamland is what that is. It's justifying the further erosion of US national sovereignty. More of the steps toward world governing bodies, which are all dedicated and sworn to the forced redistribution of wealth.

Will this forced progressive vision result in my taking ownership of some of Russia's and the Middle Eastern oil fields? Will I suddenly be entitled to some portion of South Africa's diamond mining and production? Will the world's platinum mines suddenly become in some portion owned by little old me? Or is it merely that the movement of wealth redistribution flows only one damned way? Ahhhh....now I'm onto something.

Will American grain given to Mexico result in them sending me some fresh grown fruit? Nope...they'll sell it at the highest price they can get. Will American ingenuity be traded Even Steven for an equal amount of whatever the beneficiary nation grows, mines or manufactures? Nope! But ours must be given to them. Clearly insanity is widespread amongst progressives. I do not know the proper medical name for whatever ails them, but in strictly non-medical terms, these people are asses, disloyal, treasonous in mindset and demand.

I must pose the following question...Why is conservative ideology "hate speech," yet advocating for the undermining of the Constitution not "hate speech?" These asses sore a solemn oath to "protect and defend" both the Constitution and the United States of America and I'm almost certain the borders of the nation are a part of the nation.

The only good from any of this is that with every word progressives shovel another spadeful of dirt onto their Utopian insanity. The world of Star Trek was science fiction for a reason. We are not one world. We are a planet of disparate persons, nations, tribes, societies and goals. Where is it written again that I must give up my uniqueness and national sovereignty for the good of others? Oh, that's right...it's not. It's just the hopes of one ideology who when they recite the oath are just flapping their gums.

SOURCES: hyperlink