The genesis of Martha Coakley's scandalous story goes like this. On a day in October 2005, a policeman by the name of Keith Winfield was baby sitting his 23-month-old niece, along with his own two daughters. That afternoon, when the toddler's grandma picked her up, she discovered that the toddler was crying, but not only that-she also refused to walk. After the grandma took the toddler home, she was more shocked to discover a severe "diaper rash" when she was changing her diaper. Fast forward some hours later, and the toddler's mom returns home from work: The girl was still crying due to being in continuous pain. At 11PM on the same day, still, when the mom changed the toddler's diaper once more, she became very startled to discover that the previously alarmingly red area had given way to a situation where her toddler's genital and anal area were bleeding, and the skin was peeling off, too.
The next morning, the mom took her toddler to her pediatrician who referred her to a hospital, and she would ultimately spend a month in Shriners Hospital for Children in Boston, trying to recover from the rape with a hot, curling iron. As the adult who was in the company of the 23-month-old on the day that her private area's skin began peeling and bleeding, suspicion naturally fell on the policeman uncle, Keith Winfield. In fact, a statement made on November 7, 2005, by the policeman was incriminating enough that prosecutors used it at Winfield's trial to show motive for hurting his 23-month-old niece.
Before all this was established during the trial that ultimately led to the conviction of Keith Winfield and his ensuing double-life sentence for child rape of his niece, the victim's family had to endure massive obstructionism from Coakley's office because, as Frank Frisoli has asserted, Keith Winfield's father was a union representative who steered endorsements and donations to Coakley when she was running for AG!
Thanks to obstructionism from Coakley's office, the poor victim's family had to endure-on top of the trauma of child rape-months and months of stonewalling on the part of Coakley. Indeed, the foot-dragging from Coakley became so extreme that the victim's family had to actually get a lawyer to represent them to put pressure on Coakley's office to file charges against Winfield! Said lawyer was the late Larry Frisoli (now deceased from kidney and liver failure in 2009), and if there's a good guy in this sordid-but-true tale of a Democrat seemingly protecting a child rapist, it's him.
On behalf of the poor victim's mom, Frisoli even had to file applications for criminal complaints in local, district court, precisely because the DA's office under Coakley's awful management and "leadership" was obstructing the process of filing charges against Winfield! In fact, Frisoli became so outraged at the miserable conduct of Coakley's foot-dragging and seeming protecting of Winfield that he even ran against her as a Republican for attorney general, just to force the matter.
Making things even more shockingly worse was the fact that Coakley's office-despite all the aforementioned facts being delivered to her office by Frisoli in a package-recommended releasing Winfield on no cash bail. Unbelievably, Winfield-the child rapist-policeman who ultimately would be convicted and sentenced to two life sentences for the crime-would walk around freely in MA until December 2007!
As Larry Frisoli's brother, Frank, also a lawyer, revealed on Hannity's great segment, Coakley's office even lied to the victim's family about the decision of the first grand jury to decide whether to charge Winfield or not. According to Frank Frisoli, Coakley's office dismissed the first grand jury after telling them they didn't want an indictment returned. This was more than half a year after the child rape, and Coakley's office even lied to the victim's family, misinforming them that the grand jury was at fault for failing to indict!
After all this scandalous mishandling of the cop-child rapist case, Coakley somehow managed to circumvent any heat and managed to get herself elected as AG! Clearly, the liberal media, locally, must've covered this up because I can't believe MA voters would willingly vote for a politician who's criminally soft on child rapists-even if they're Democrats. The moral of the story is that corrupt, government officials get away with a lot of shocking and traumatizing viciousness if no one-such as, saaaaaay...uhhhh, the media-watches them. MA voters must ask themselves, Do we want to send a woman to the Senate who's verifiably lax on child rapists?
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
Further Reading: Democrat Judiciary Committee in Cahoots with AG Holder Lets Justice Dept Cover-Up Black Panther Voter Intimidation, Video of Sarah Palin Debut on Fox News Channel with Bill O'Reilly, Top Ten Obama Failures for 2009
Sources:
Michael Rezendes, Some saw Coakley as lax on '05 rape case, Boston.com
Frank Frisoli E-mail, Docstoc.com
Sean Hannity, Coakley's Controversial Past, YouTube
Published by Marc Schenker
Contact Marc at marc_schenker@telus.net to praise, criticize, or request anything of him since he fears nothing or no one. Marc Schenker is a political junkie and Political Writer and Analyst for Associated... View profile
- 'Megan's Law' Killer Jesse Timmendequas' Death Penalty Sentence Reduced to Life in...New Jersey's Legislation to abolish the Death Penalty has been a hot debate item. This has been a sore subject for many in the state including the family of Megan Kanka, who was murdered, raped and beaten by convicted...
- Child Rape Victim Must Face Her Perpetrator Every DayA child rape victim was victimized a second time by the court system in Sumner County, Tennessee.
- Is Mary Kaye Letourneau a Sex Offender?When she is released in 2004, Mary K. Letourneau will have a felony on her record. She will register with the state of Washington as a child sex offender, convicted of the "rape of a child in the second degree: (9RCW...
- Texas Polygamy Case Should Spur Changes in Child Removal Across the NationNo matter how the Texas Polygamy case ends, the impact of the legal requirements for removing children from potentially abusive homes deserve a second look nation wide.
- Can Scott Brown Win Teddy Kennedy's Senate Seat?Can Scott Brown, a Republican running to capture Teddy Kennedy's old Senate seat in Massachusetts, actually win? There is some anecdotal evidence that Scott Brown is doing far better against his opponent, Martha Coakl...
- Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Child Rape Case
- President Obama Campaigns for Martha Coakley Through Recorded Phone Message in Mas...
- Liberals Rally Around Child Rapist
- Child Pornography and Sex Crimes Involving Children
- New Tool to Hunt Child Sex Predators Can Wipe Out Child Sexual Abuse in America
- How Much Civil Liberty is Enough for a Child Molester?
- Why is Scott Brown Doing Well Against Martha Coakley?





16 Comments
Post a CommentMArtha Coakly is a pathetic monkey. Get her out of office.. She is below human.
she does not deserve to be in office..
John
I am a life long resident of MA. When this case was adjudicated, there was a conscious effort to keep the details from public perview. As to the comment that we should be voting for someone, not against someone, I agree. I will vote for Scott Brown because he opposes this type of egregious abuse. The campaign has gotten so nasty that he has been forced to file a law suit to force the Coakley campaign to stop distorting his record.
Disturbing story... Thanks for this report!
what an extremely awful thing to do to his own neice and he is STILL a police man?! How can ANYONE(esp. the AG) expect such a monster to uphold the law in the community?! God help this country...
what an extremely awful thing to do to his own neiand he is still a police man?! How can ANYONE(esp. the AG) expect such a monster to uphold the law in the community?! God help this country...
So sad what happened to that baby!
did you read the details? It is often that bail is not asked for when people show up on their own and they have generations of roots in the community.
It would be one thing if there was something that had happened as a result of this, but it turned out she was right. He showed up for his trial and was convicted.
So, is your argument that she was ... See Moreright?
What is sad is people pulling this child's trauma out for their own political gain.
What politics needs is to get back to why you vote FOR somebody instead of all of this dirt digging, why should vote AGAINST the other campaigning. And sadder that we, as Americans give them reason to keep doing this by buying into it every single time.
I dont think this has anything to do with party affiliation. It has to do with greed and hunger for power. Unfortunately it happens on both sides. That little baby is a victim, of not only that sick monster who should never see the light of day, but of our society's disgusting craving for money and prestige.
Marc, regardless of party affiliation, she is despicable to recommend anything but the death penalty to such a vile person!
see David's comment! thanks :) jeffrey