Divided House: Obama Policy on Coal Waste at Odds with Itself
Leaders of EPA and Department of Interior at Loggerheads on Their Agendas
President Barack Obama's appointments for key environmental offices are diametrically opposed to one another, according to environmental expert Jeff Stant. Stant, a longstanding watchdog and environmental regulation advocate, states Obama's recent environmental office appointments reflect a horrifyingly divided approach to addressing the nation's largest industrial pollution problem: coal combustion waste.
Says Stant, "Obama's recent nominations to lead the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and the Interior Department's Office of Surface Mining [OSM] reflect a divided approach that collectively don't make any sense."
"Obama's nominations of Lisa Jackson and Joseph Pizarchik collectively makes no sense. On the one hand we have Jackson, who would be heading up the EPA - an entity whose sworn purpose is to protect the environment and our interaction with it. And then on the other hand we have Pizarchik to head the Department of Interior's OSM. This is a fellow whose entire career has represented big business and its exploitation of the environment - to the detriment of ecosystems and inhabitants of that environment, humans included."
Why the Divided House?
When asked how US President Obama's choices reflecting such an apparent division could have been made, Stant post several possible scenarios.
"It's not exactly clear. Perhaps the President's decision may have been based on partial ignorance of these people's backgrounds. On the other hand, perhaps he's just trying to walk the middle of the line -- appease both sides. On the one side, we have the voice of concern from people who care about the environment and who are represented in general by the EPA. On the other side, Obama cannot deny the very real force of big business backed by big money and aggressive lobbyist presence."
"No matter what the reason, my greatest concern is that this seemingly opposing set of agendas may result in an overall neutralizing effect in the coal waste issue. By this I mean this will leave things pretty much in a status quo situation. Nothing will get done."
Jeff Stant banks this statement on years of experience as a leader of movements starting at the grassroots level, and whose work takes him on frequent visits to Capitol Hill to address the ongoing environmental problems brought on by coal waste.
About Coal Waste
Each year US coal-fired power plants produce more than 126 million tons of solid coal combustion waste, with about 100,000 tons of this comprising toxic metals (*U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2005). After burning coal at their power plants, electrical power utilities usually send their toxic waste back to the coal mining companies that sold the coal to them. The mining companies usually either dispose of this waste in open pits, or bury it in the ground from which the coal originally came. In either scenario, toxins from this waste eventually leach into nearby groundwater and arrive in the tap water thousands of American families drink every day.
About Jeff Stant
Jeff Stant has been a champion to various environmental causes for more than 30 years. With experience as the former Director of the Hoosier Environmental Council and author of numerous reports spelling out the many environmental effects caused by the dumping of coal combustion waste. Jeff's recent work includes the publication of his findings following a two-year research project. His two-thousand page environmental impact report - issued in conjunction with the Clean Air Task Force - blew the lid off of one of the largest unregulated coal waste dumping operations in the United States.
Freelance writer John Melendez helped co-author the report and periodically interviews Jeff Stant for updates on events years following its issuance.
*****
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: John Melendez is a freelance writer reporting on technology, the environment, sustainability, alternative energies and "green" issues. John Melendez is a writer for hire. To email him, go to http://www.emailmeform.com/fid.php?formid=19595
*****
Subscribe to RSS and other feeds for this site: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/JohnsCoolreads
For RSS Feed: http://www.associatedcontent.com/rss/user_76423.xml
Legal Disclaimer & Safety Notice: Author does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, safety, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or referred to. Information is provided for informational purposes only. Any actions or assumptions taken on the reader's part as a result of any information disclosed by Author are taken entirely at the reader's own risk. Author shall not be liable for any errors in the content, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Furthermore, Author shall not be liable for any loss of profits, contracts, opportunities or any direct, indirect, consequential loss of any kind (including death and/or injury), business interruption or loss of property arising out of or in connection with the use of the information herein. News items, opinions, and/or statements posed by author may be unsubstantiated and should be considered also as such. Unless where expressly stated, Author claims no express or understood association with any person, entity, or third party mentioned. "Cibola International" is a service mark (SM) and trade mark (™ ®) belonging expressly to John Melendez with all rights reserved worldwide.
© 2009 J. Melendez / Cibola International - All rights reserved worldwide. Duplication in part or in full is prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted.
Published by John Melendez
The Yahoo! Contributor Network ranks John Melendez in the Top 1% of its 400,000 writers. John has worked as a journalist and technical writer developing content for industry, health care, and IT. John Me... View profile
- Federal Agency Sued Over Coal-Plant Funding PlanSeveral environmental groups have sued the U.S.D.A.'s Rural Development Utilities Program over its plans to underwrite the construction of at least seven new coal-fired power plants nationwide.
Coal: Clean Energy or Silent Killer?In 2002, AEP decided to by out a small town in Ohio that was located below their plant, pay the residents to move, and get them to sign a "health waiver". So who won in this deal?- Proposals for Michigan Clean Coal Plants Spark DebateEight clean coal power plants are proposed in Michigan, leading to a tug-of-war between business and environmental groups.
It's Official: Sen. Barack Obama Joins White House RaceIllinois Sen. Barack Obama makes his run for office formal ending the months of speculations. In saying, "yes" to the run for office, he ultimately, is laying challenge to Ameri...
Department of the Interior Poised to Allow Coal Mining Expansion in Blac...Peabody Coal has been mining in Black Mesa, Arizona for forty years, and during that time has used extensive amounts of underground water resources to transport coal slurry to p...
- Coal Waste: Death for You & Your Children?
- Coal-Fired Power Needs to Step Down
- Coal Waste Pollutes Pennsylvania Groundwater, Streams
- "Clean Coal" Power Advertisements: Meant to Mislead
- Waste Reduction in America's Backyard
- 2008 TVA Kingston Fossil Plant Coal Ash Spill
- Environment: Coal Ash Dumping is Poisoning Our Water & Making Us Sick
- Coal waste is America's biggest industrial pollution problem.
- Obama's appointments to key environmental positions don't make sense.




