DNA Testing for Un-Scooped Dog Poop?

Will Your City Require You to DNA Your Dog in the Fight Against Unscooped Poop..

Donna Thacker
The idea behind DNA testing for un-scooped dog poop is that every dog will be required to have a DNA test as part of the licensing procedure, or when it is micro chipped by the vet. These DNA results are kept on file in a database for the city or area's battle against poop.

When the city, or land owner, finds an offending pile of dog poop left behind it will be tested for DNA and cross matched to locate the owner who did not clean up after their dog. The owner will then be fined for leaving a mess in city streets, parks or condo area properties.

Baltimore Condo Considers DNA Dog Poop Testing

According to an ABC News report, a Baltimore Condo is seriously proposing DNA profiling of their resident's dogs. Each condo owner that has a dog will pay $50.00 to have their dog's DNA collected and then a monthly maintenance fee so that a groundskeeper can "collect" any stools left behind.

The collected dog poop will be tested and hopefully matched to DNA on file. If the DNA shows one of the condo owners neglected to clean up Fido's poop, they will be fined up to $500.00. Some of the condo owners are protesting this proposal, calling it ridiculous.

Several other cities, both in the States and abroad, either already require the DNA testing or are considering it as a way to get the poop off of the streets. Many people think this is a waste of time and money on everyone's part. Considering the number of stray dog's and irresponsible owners, it may be impossible to track a pile of poop back to the dog owner that left it behind.

Will DNA of Dog Poop Lead to Profiling Certain Breeds?

DNA testing can also determine the exact breed of a dog. Some people fear that this is a way for city officials to profile certain dog types. Pit bulls, in particular, are banned in many cities or areas. If a dog's DNA shows that it even has a slight amount of Pit Bull heritage, owners fear that their dog will be targeted and banned.

Responsible dog owners that will comply with the DNA testing are the one's that actually clean up their dog's poop. They feel that it will not help the messy streets, because the owners of the dog messes will not be found. They also say it is a ridiculous waste of tax payer's money, as the pooper scoopers will still be doing the same job as they are doing now.

In 2003 there were 102,004 dogs that were licensed in New York City. There probably were, and still are, many dog owners that never adhered to the law of licensing their dog. So, if each of these dogs were DNA's to trace their poop, someone would have to search 102,004 records trying to find the dog that left the poop.

If the poop came from a dog that was not licensed and therefore had no DNA on file, someone just wasted a lot of time. It would have been more time and cost effective to just pick the poop up! Why target the responsible dog owners that do clean up their dog's poop?

Is tracking a dog's DNA in an effort to get owner's to clean up their poop the answer to the piles left behind by irresponsible owners? Some city officials think that it is, while other's protest the expense. Why not just put plastic doggie bag dispensers on the streets and watch where you step!

Sources

http://www.petside.com/petsideblog/2010/07/dna-testing-for-unscooped-dog.php

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/dna-testing-dogs-poop-sniff-negligent-condo-owners/story?id=10689585

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/02/magazine/02freak.html

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4738396

Published by Donna Thacker - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle

Donna is an award- winning fiction author, recently published with Twin Trinity Media. While she enjoys writing fiction, Donna also has a knack for writing informative articles that show her knowledge and p...  View profile

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Patricia Cook11/30/2010

    Pretty wild. I know there's a poop problem, but don't think this is the answer.
    When you think of all the rape kits and other biological evidence that hasn't been tested in criminal cases, wasting resources for this seems a little misdirected.

  • Tara M. Clapper9/12/2010

    Wow. This would definitely encourage BSL (breed specific legislation) and make it so that no one could own pit bulls. We may have to give up our family pet because of these rules. It's sad.

  • Heidi Rucki9/11/2010

    This one is amazing. To me it sounds very "Big Brother" or 1984. I'll go along with this when they start licensing cats. To me, cats that have free run everywhere are a much bigger problem. That's another topic. Back to the dogs - what makes anyone think that people would ever comply with the DNA bit? If they have a pit bull and don't want it identified as a pit bull, they'll just use different DNA - I haven't thought this through - but there'll be a way to cheat. Besides, who's going to pay for the DNA test? People that are strapped already? Like always, the responsible people already pick up the poopie piles; it's the ones that don't that will, once again, ruin it for everybody!

  • Patricia Sicilia9/7/2010

    What a waste of time and money.

  • Bill Hanks8/26/2010

    You got to be kidding me.

  • Patrice Campbell8/26/2010

    I just think the whole idea is poop.
    Look at the backlog in labs doing DNA testing. Just because the technology is there to identify dog quap doesn't mean the resources are justified.
    Good article, Donna.

  • JerseyNana8/26/2010

    Thanks Donna for giving us the latest poop on this subject! LOL

  • Charlotte Kuchinsky8/26/2010

    Okay, that's a bit strange even though I realize it is a problem that has to be dealt with.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.