But recently I decided I'd like to have the barista do it for me - seems more efficient and I wouldn't have to mess with the lid and stuff. Starbucks coffee (or espresso, in my case) is really good, but I don't really want to spend any more time there than I have to in the morning, "happily" chatting with people before I've had my morning caffeine.
Well, you wouldn't believe the problems that the simple act of requesting sugar in my coffee (espresso, actually) has caused. Here are some of the ridiculous conversations requesting sugar in my coffee has caused:
ME: "Hello, I'd like a triple grande no-whip mocha with 4 sugars, please."
Starbucks Barista: "Sugar In The Raw?"
ME: "No, just regular sugar."
Starbucks Barista:"We don't have sugar."
ME: (I do a double take, then...) "You don't have sugar?"
Starbucks Barista:"No, we only have Sugar In The Raw."
ME: "Ok, whatever, 4 Sugar In The Raw, then."
This was a conversation via the speaker at a drive-through (another reason I've taken to having the barista add my sugar for me - I finally found a neighborhood Starbucks in West Des Moines, Iowa, with a drive-thru. Oddly enough, a Starbucks with a drive through is incredibly rare in this frozen wasteland, where you would think drive-throughs would be the norm due to the weather, but I digress.....)
Anyway, so I drive up to the window and the cashier processes my card while telling me how much better Sugar In The Raw is for me. Whatever. I really don't care. I just want my caffeine and don't care to get into long discussions in the morning before I've had it. Just give it to me!
I finally get my coffee and drive away. And I drink it, and it's like there is almost no sugar in it at all. I have to be on the road for the next 20 minutes or so to be to my destination in a timely manner, so I don't really have any choice except to drink my not-very-sweet mocha as it is. (The add-shots of espresso of the "triple" are very intense and do need sugar or something to tame them.)
Er, anyway, it's not-very-sweet until I get to the bottom.... Not only are the last few drinks extremely sweet, but they are very crunchy as well! It took me a minute to figure out that these little crunchies were 'Sugar In The Raw' bits that had never dissolved.
Never dissolved even after being exposed to scalding hot espresso and steamed milk and then stirred. After that it was sitting in this liquid for 20 minutes as I drank down my beverage, bit by bit, on my way to my destination. Ish. Still crunchy - as in non-biodegradable? Another question for another time... again, I digress.....
So the next time I ordered from Starbucks, I just put the sugar in myself, as I went inside. Why they have sugar at the little self-serve bar but not available to the barista is far beyond me, but whatever.
Soon after that, though, I needed to hit the drive-thru again. It was on my way, and I was kind of in a hurry. I needed my caffeine so decided I would live with whatever they gave me. I was resigned to "Sugar In The Raw" and did not desire a long conversation about it.
I ordered my drink at the speaker:
ME: "I'd like a triple grande no-whip mocha with 4 sugars, please."
Starbucks Barista:"Sugar In The Raw?"
ME: "Well, since that's all you have, then yes."
Starbucks Barista:"We have Sugar in the Raw, Nutrasweet, Splenda...."
ME: "I don't want an artificial sweetener, just sugar."
Starbucks Barista:"Well Sugar In The Raw is not artificial!"
ME: (Shaking my head in exasperated disgust that this conversation had to happen again......) "OK, I'll take that, then."
So I get to the window and am met by not only the cashier, but two baristas. One who says how much better Sugar in the Raw is for you. And another who says if I ask for him especially, he will measure out 4 measures of white sugar just for me after I tell him that Sugar In The Raw never dissolves well in my drink. It was a debacle.
As a side note, happily, they did remember to give me my coffee after all of their clucking, squawking, and quacking.
So the next time, determined never to have this conversation again, I ordered my coffee like this:
"I'd like a triple grande no-whip mocha with 4 sugars-in-the-raw, please."
Cool. Works like a charm. Until I get to the window and the cashier says,
"Oh, you're the one with the big 'Sugar In The Raw Fiasco' aren't you? Did it taste all right? Did we convert you???"
WTF....... In stunned disbelief I thanked her grimly for my coffee and drove away, determined never to visit that particular Starbucks Drive Through ever again. In my mind I imagined a Starbucks company newsletter and a story in it about how to handle customers who want (gasp) sugar in their coffee, with a headline reading, "The Great Sugar In The Raw Fiasco of 2008." And I am mortified.
So this morning.......
I walk in to a Starbucks. I order my usual. I say only "sugar" when I order, instead of "sugar in the raw" - just to see if they happen to have sugar packets. Maybe it's only that one drive-through that does not have white sugar packets. I guess I'll find out.
I order my drink. The cashier does not correct me when I say "sugar." I feel optimistic. I walk over to the other end of the counter and the barista starts preparing my drink. She pulls out a little cup with all the sweeteners available to her.
Sugar is not among them. Sugar In The Raw is present in abundance. She takes 4 packets of Sugar In The Raw and empties them into my drink after the espresso and steamed milk are added.
She stirs. She stirs. She stirs. She looks up at me, still stirring her little heart out, and says, "I can still feel lot's of little granuals down there."
I say, "I know. Sugar in the Raw does not ever dissolve when it's put into my drink."
I try very hard not to show that I am restraining a bit of a rant.
I try very hard not to let on to her that her words were the "third base" punchline in a long-running Abbott and Costello routine. I try very hard, and succeed, to maintain my composure.
I thank her for my drink.
I leave.
20 minutes later I am crunching my little Sugar In The Raw granuals......
And I wonder - why does Starbucks push a sweetener that is not optimal for their main product?
The phrases "strategic alliance" and "I think I'll put this in my blog" run through my head.
Crunch. Crunch. Crunch..... I suppose it could be worse. At least it's not High-Fructose Corn Syrup....
Published by Sherry Dedman
I am a divorced Mom of an autistic, 9-year-old boy. I love to write in my "spare" time. I love books, great writing, movies, great music and almost anything with an "edge." View profile
- Feeding Your Pet Sugar GliderPart of responsible pet ownership is seeing to your pet's nutritional needs. This can often be difficult with exotics, much of the information available being misleading, inconclusive, or incorrect. Learn what to fee...
Addicted to SugarSugar, the refined byproduct of sugar cane or sugar beets, is getting lots of negative attention these days. But is it an addiction, as some people claim?- 10 Tips for Cutting Sugar Out of Your DietIt is no secret, Americans love sugar and we put it in everything. Sugar is added to whole wheat bread and muffins and even cigarettes. Read on to find out how to cut the sugar!
Tips on Having a Low Sugar, Healthy Holiday Season for Your KidsParents trying to limit their child's sugar intake will find the holidays particularly frustrating. Try some alternatives to sugar content, now and through out the entire year.- Sugar Free Cocktail RecipesLow carb and low calorie diets have one thing in common; they don't want you to have sugar. One of the most difficult places to accomplish this is alcoholic drink. Here are some easy recipes for sugar free cocktails.
- Starbucks and Its Influence on Bangkok's Hippie Heaven: Khao San Road
- Newhall Micro-Roasted Coffee in California: Starbucks' Strongest Competition?
- Starbucks Coffee Company Refuses to Support Our Troops at War
- Starbucks Defending Charges of Labor Law Violations
- Have You Had Your Cup of "Anti-God" Starbucks This Morning?
- Java Wars: McDonald's Vs. Starbucks
- Starbucks Java Chip Ice Cream Review
- Sugar In The Raw leaves crunchies in the bottom of my coffee
- Starbucks seems to be pushing Sugar In The Raw
- Why does Starbucks tell you, "We don't have sugar?"





15 Comments
Post a CommentRaw sugar has a distict taste difference from white sugar; moer specifically, it reminded me of sugar cane stalk. I love sugar cane stalk, but your right about the whole not dissolving thing. I ordered a coffee and it wasn't that sweet.. figured it musta been at the bottom, and lo and behold, it was.
Raw sugar is healthier, it tastes better..and it reminded me of eating sugar cane stalk (which is a HUGE plus for me)
I am actually considering getting me and my friends to try malasadas that use raw sugar instead of white sugar.. It'd be different and not at all bad.
- Class of 2012
You do realise that the white bleached sugar you 'desire' is most likely genetically modified sugar beet product courtesy of Monsanto? It isn't pure cane sugar... That'swhy the sugar in the raw is actually the best choice overall.. And if you're one of those 'who don't care, just gimme my sugar (poison" so be it.. You're a clown, if that's the case.
Hi, Hayley - Actually, I don't get extra sugar in my mocha anymore. I have since learned that the barristas do not usually stir the mochas - and that is why they weren't tasting sweet at all. So all the chocolate and sugar were in the bottom of the cup. I figured this out after the one time (as I wrote in the article) the barrista *did* stir and it tasted way too sweet. Coincidentally, someone left me a comment on my blog telling me you could (should) ask for it stirred. "Stirred" is actually a button on the register, laughably. And if you'd read the article, you'd know that I did ask for regular sugar, but they told me they only have sugar in the raw behind the bar (thus the point of the title of this article). Anyway, now that I know that I have to direct them to do something they should be doing anyway (stir the ingredients they put into the cup), I don't get any extra sugar at all anymore. Oh, and yes I know Sugar in the Raw takes longer to dissolve - that was one of the po
Dear Person,
1) Starbucks mocha is already full of sugar. What is wrong with you that you want more sugar in your caffeine/sugarfest? Possibly your drink is saturated with sugar and therefor no more will dissolve.
2) Starbucks keeps white sugar in a canister, not in packets, so you cannot have "4" of them.
3) Sugar in the Raw does take longer to dissolve because it has larger crystals.
4) I suggest you stop at the gas station and get a mocha if you need something with more sugar.
Sounds like you need to switch to a syrup or just more shots of mocha chocolate -- ?
HAHAHAH! jk.
I've (i know) been a big fan of sugar in the raw for a long time, so i'm a bit confused by this. I don't seem to have the granual problem. Maybe it's because i go to the Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf . ;) Just kidding.
Sounds like you need to switch to a syrup or just more shots of mocha chocolate -- ?
HAHAHAH! jk.
I've (i know) been a big fan of sugar in the raw for a long time, so i'm a bit confused by this. I don't seem to have the granual problem. Maybe it's because i go to the Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf . ;) Just kidding.
Very interesting and funny! Nice work!
Very funny and good characterizations.
Loved this!
Entertaining article.