Yahoo News reported on Friday, Sept. 26, that Dr. Straus conducted research on 17,000 students from 32 countries and found that "the higher the percent of parents who used corporal punishment, the lower the national average IQ."
In the United States he and fellow researchers studied data from 806 children between the ages of 2 and 4 and 704 between the ages of 5 and 9. Then he came back and checked their IQ's four years after the initial IQ data was collected and found that the group of children not spanked scored from 3-5 points higher on their second IQ test than the group that was spanked.
Dr. Straus then concluded that the more spanking a child received the slower their mental IQ development, but that even small amounts of spanking would make a difference, as he stated in a news release from the University of New Hampshire.
So, does spanking children really harm their intelligence, or are their parents just less educated and possess lower IQ's to begin with? It has become a controversial subject amongst parents and educators. To spank or not; that is the question that many parents ask themselves. For this parent and author, I made the decision to not spank many years before the subject was controversial; back 35 years ago when children were still routinely spanked and it was accepted discipline.
Today's parents are sometimes threatened with criminal charges for spanking. Spanking can escalate into child abuse easily and the line between the two is very narrow. It's why I made the decision to not spank, having suffered from routine beatings in several foster homes as a young child. Several of those foster homes believed in the theory we often hear spouted by the religious right.. Spare the rod, spoil the child.
This author did not find that to be the case, having being harshly spanked and becoming almost a juvenile delinquent before I was rescued from such "care". In deciding not to spank our own five children, my husband and I discovered other ways to effectively discipline them. All five managed to develop into respectful, law abiding, polite young men and women with self discipline and good control of their emotions and actions. Are they perfect? Nope. But they were always far better behaved than many of their peers who were spanked routinely.
Whether it contributed to their high IQ's, I don't know. I guess I would have been a genius if I hadn't been spanked so often as a child. Three of our five have IQ's far above the norm, and the other two rank well above the norm.
Did not spanking them make them brighter? I don't know the answer to that question.
But I do know the answer to this one. Can parents find a better way to discipline their children than spanking them?
Yes, they can, is my answer from personal experience and they should try to do so. The results might not give you a genius, but it will give you a kind and loving child who learns to control their actions and their emotions.
This survey by Dr. Straus will certainly add to the controversy over a parent's right to discipline their children, but it's a controversial subject all societies need to be debating. Fight for the right to hit your innocent child if you think that works to provide the best discipline.
But expect those of us who have learned that spanking isn't good discipline to say so. The goal of all discipline with children should be to teach and inform and educate your child on how to behave in their society. Hitting others is never the way to learn discipline. There are far more effective discipline techniques.
While reading about this research I stumbled across this anonymous posting on Religious Tolerance.org, along with some other great opinions on the subject of spanking children. I found it to be a powerful statement of how I feel also.
"In the 19th century, Christians gradually realized that human slavery was profoundly immoral, even though it was recognized, permitted, condoned, regulated and accepted in dozens of biblical passages. This was a great shock to people who had assumed that the Bible was 'the Good Book.' They were forced to realize that the Bible promoted an immoral institution, and that 19th century morality was superior to that of the Bible. We are now in the 21st century and Christians will be going through the same process with regard to the whipping of children."
Resources
Yahoo News http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20090925/hl_hsn/spankingmaylowerkidsiqs
The author's personal experience and thoughts
Religious Tolerance: http://www.religioustolerance.org/spankingq.htm
Published by Betty Malone
"There is a land of the living and a land of the dead and the bridge is love, the only survival, the only meaning." - Thornton Wilder This is Betty's daughter. Betty Malone died unexpectedly Tuesday, N... View profile
- Preserving Childhood: The Detrimental Effects of Corporal PunishmentCorporal punishment has been a popular method of punishment that many parents choose to incorporate into their lives without giving it a careful thought. It can begin at a
- Dating AbuseThe following is a paper researching the presence of dating abuse in today's society as well as its causes.
- Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child?Spare the rod, spoil the child? This old saying has been denied.
- Spare the Rod, Spoil the ChildAn article about why it is OK to spank your children.
The Destructive Nature of Spanking ChildrenSpanking children can cause more damage to them in the long run. If you have concerns about your child's behavior first see the child's physician, and then go from there. Here y...
- A Parent's Rules for Spanking: The Correct Way to Spank Your Child
- Spanking Children
- Is Spanking Bad for Children?
- California, Assembly woman Sally Lieber Proposes Anti-Spanking Bill
- Proposed Bill to Ban Spanking Supported by Many
- What You Don't Know About Physical Punishment and Children's Discipline
- Does Spanking Equal Discipline?




26 Comments
Post a CommentYou did a great job on this Betty..I wish you were still here so we could discuss this issue further. I think spanking should be the very last option, and not done while a parent is in a rage or very angry. I was spanked a few times as a kid, but I hated it so much that I did my best not to earn another spanking.
Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.
Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:
American Academy of Pediatrics,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Center For Effective Discipline,
PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN memb
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:
Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.
Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.
I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.
There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:
Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak,
The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson,
NO VITAL ORGANS THERE So They Say
by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.
Other options are better than spanking, I agree. But I'm not sure if spanking affects IQ. I was spanked as a child, and my IQ is quite high (as is my sister's).
Awesome article. I heartily concur.
I was raised with spankings (no confessions about IQ) but time outs and other techniques are so much easier and less painful to use :)
I am not too sure about the diminished IQ if spanked. i think a child neds a few taps at times. However, it does seem that some parents have no idea as to how to chastise a child. They take belts and hangers, cords and large hands. This can cause damage in more ways than one. Diminished IQ is the least of our worries when dealing with parents who haven't a clue as to what proper punishmnet is !
I believe there is a huge difference between giving a child a couple of firm swats on their rear end, and beating them. Spanking should never be done out of anger. And kids are different; one method of discipline does not necessarily work for all kids. A more defiant child may need to have their attention awakened by a couple of swats, whereas a more compliant child may only need timeout or a firm talking-to. By all means, use whatever method works best for each particular child, but maintain your composure as you discipline.
I think there are most likely other common (environmental) elements found in the home lives of the children used in the stats. I don't think a spanking is usually violent enough to inflict harm (mental or physical), and I believe it's usually done to embarrass the child more than to harm the child. That being said, I think there are far more effective ways of to discipline. I was spanked, paddled, and switched as a kid, but nothing made me angrier (or calmed me down better) than a trip to the corner.
Spanking like leashes does not work.