For the moment, little psychological proof has been obtained. This is not surprising as such research takes a great deal of time and psychology is one of the most complex arts to manage - we're all such a mess of emotions that it's virtually impossible to make any sweeping statements. Nor is this in any way a derogatory comment: there is simply too little solid evidence to make a proper judgement at the moment. Until such time as someone very smart comes up with a way to measure the effects of such things, we are left with opinion and common sense to guide us.
When I was young (and dinosaurs roamed the Earth), the media were less sensationalist than they are now. Television and print news was concerned primarily with reporting important world events rather than seeking out the most offensive, shocking and disturbing stories possible. It is an undeniable fact that the world has changed a great deal over the last thirty years or so and our children are now watching Japanese anime, Batman in his Dark Knight reincarnation and MTV rather than the light, gentle programmes with which I was enamoured as a youngling. Yet, looking at the deeper changes in society rather than the surface effects can perhaps provide some insight.
The main difference I notice as an adult watching children play and hearing them talk on their way home from school is the way that the virtual and real worlds have moved closer. As children and adolescents, our imaginations are wild, unchained things, easily flitting from subject to subject, creating whole worlds of adventure with scenes worthy of any modern film. I think there are probably very few adults of my generation who didn't at some time tie their coat around their neck, pretend it was a cape and become Superman for an hour or two! However, the remarkable difference for me is in the manner of imagining, not the content.
I was lucky to grow up in a family with solid moral values, encouragement to read as well as play and a firm grounding in reality. This may have been because my parents were of an earlier generation than most or it may simply have been their psychological make-up. I don't know for sure. What I do know is that it was always very clear that there was a real and important difference between what happened between a book's covers or behind the illuminated screen of the TV (or monitor) and what was outside the front door. I played role-playing games with my brothers and friends as well - the previous target of frequent blame for increased violence in youngsters - but they never had a problem with this, despite my father being very religious. They understood that it was a creative form and passed this understanding to us. This is where, personally, I feel we have failed the younger generation as parents or as a society as a whole.
Quite some time ago, I remember reading an article about a school where they had decided to teach children "television grammar". The teachers had realised that more and more children were having difficulty distinguishing between the "reality" they saw on television and actual reality. With kids spending significantly more time in front of a screen, they had decided that it would be a good idea to actually educate an entire generation on the differences, the way television programs were written and the reasons why most programmes should be seen as entertainment and not life guidance.
And so, with that example, I come full circle: I do not personally believe that the violence in video games can be blamed for increased violence in youngsters. It is, without a doubt, a contributing factor, but no more significant than many others. I believe that the main cause of such disturbing occurences is that our society as a whole has failed to educate its children on the correct way to behave in real life and has left them to learn as best they can from the images that come into our homes through the screen of the TV and computer.
Published by Spike Wyatt
Spike was born and raised in the UK, studying computers at University in London. After a time working in a variety of jobs, he went to France, where he lived and worked for over seven years. He returned to t... View profile
Violence and Video Games - The Thoughts of a TeenSchool shootings and violence are becoming more and more of a problem in the United States. Are video games to blame?
Do Video Games Really Contribute to Violence?First off, I am going to come right out and say that I personally beleive that video games do not truely contribute to violent shootings or act of shootings in todays world. - Violence in Video Games - an OverviewThis article looks at both sides of the controversial issue of violence in video games
- Violence in Video Games: Real Threat or a Bunch or Hype?I don't think so! I've been playing video games for a long time now and I have NEVER wanted to do the stuff in real life that I do in the game.
- Violence: Should We Blame Video Games?Yes, there is violence in video games. But, there's violence everywhere. People always blame the video game industry basically because its an easy target and it relieves older generations, which control the media, fro...
- The Perfect Job: Video Games Tester
- The Best Video Games for Young Kids
- What Children Can Learn from Playing Video Games
- Censorship in Video Games
- Can Video Games Cause Mental Problems?
- Video Games and Violence: Not Causing Tragedies Since 1971
- Do Video Games Contribute to Violence?




1 Comments
Post a CommentSpike, have to agree with you. I've played computer games obsessively for more than 15 years and it certainly hasn't made me any more violent. I also taught teenagers in a Thai high school who all played computer games - they were all much less violent than their Western counterparts and that has a lot to do with Thai culture. It's just not acceptable to be violent or rude in Thailand.