Does Vitamin D Offer Cancer Protection - Two Headlines Contradict Each Other
How Can the Consumer Make Sense of it All
First, lets look at the specific titles, they are not mutually exclusive. It could be that if you have higher levels of vitamin D you are less likely to get cancer, but more of those who do get cancer will die from it. Possible, but highly unlikely, let's discard this possibility for now. furthermore, it may be that Study B is correct that colon and breast cancer are reduced, but Study A would also be correct if, for example, this were compensated by higher incidence of some other type of cancer. However, there is no data to suggest a higher incidence of any form of cancer from higher levels of vitamin D (within normal limits), so it would be impossible to make this conclusion.
Second, let's look at the methodology of the studies.
Study A: vitamin D levels were checked at the start of the study and then cancer death rates were followed for 6-12 years afterward. So the real conclusion is that having a higher level of vitamin D at one given moment in time does not provide lasting cancer preventative benefit. In other words, if you take vitamin D pills for two weeks, it doesn't offer 6-12 years of benefit. This is a poorly crafted study which should have regularly measured vitamin D levels during the entire study period, in my opinion. Even so, they did find that death from colon cancer was reduced.
Study B: (I'll quote from Reuters here) "researchers at the University of California used data on average wintertime blood levels of vitamin D and rates of breast and colon cancers in 15 countries. They found that rates of the diseases tended to fall as average vitamin D levels climbed." This suggests that during periods when vitamin D levels are higher, cancer rates are lower. In other words, as long as one maintains a high level of vitamin D, there is likely to be some cancer preventative benefit (for breast and colon cancer). Study B's methodology seems much stronger. However, the evidence is for an assocaition of vitamin D levels and lower rates of breast and colon cancer, and can't scientifically say one causes the other. More research would be needed for that.
Both studies, need follow up studies to firmly make the case either way, with more well thought out methodology. However, they BOTH seem to find evidence that incidence of colon cancer is substantially reduced by higher vitamin D levels. Furthermore, laboratory studies show that cancer cell growth and spread is inhibited by exposure to vitamin D.
I did NOT have access to the full studies and based this upon what was reported in various news outlets. News outlets are not always reliable in their interpretation and reporting of study results and methodologies, so there is some chance that I am not in possession of key data from these studies that would change my opinion, but for now this is the best I have to go on.
My vitamin D conclusion: Very moderate exposure to sunlight and/or regular vitamin D supplements is safe and the preponderence of evidence suggests it will reduce the incidence of colon cancer (and perhaps breast cancer). Note that reduced incidence doesn't mean you can't get it, just that the odds are less that you will. There are also other health benefits for vitamin D supplementation supported by other research. Because there is extremely low risk for taking vitamin D supplements, I feel that this is enough information for me to take vitamin D with the goal of reduction in likelihood of breast and colon cancer. So how much to take? The US Recommended Daily Allowance is 200 IU for young adults and 600 IU for older adults. other studies suggests that is on the low side. My lay opinion: for any adult age, taking a 600 IU supplement in combination with dietary sources of vitamin D and very moderate sunlight exposure (which helps the body make more vitamin D available) should get you enough to provide measurable cancer protection and other substantial health benefits without any significant risk. This is not advice about what you should do, I am not a doctor. make your own decision in consultation with your doctor.
Sources:
Vitamin D does not prevent death from cancer , Reuters
More vitamin D could mean fewer cancers: study, Reuters
Published by Brad Sylvester - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle
Brad spent 18 years in the consumer electronics industry, including more than ten years in new product development. He now writes full time from his home in the mountains of New Hampshire. View profile
-
Colon Cancer is Serious
This is an article which explains why routine colon cancer screenings should be done before age 50 and why insurance companies should pay for them
- How to Prevent Skin Cancer Over 1 million new cases of skin cancer will be diagnosed this year alone. Learn why we must understand this preventable disease and how to keep your self and your family safe from the harmful effects of the sun.
- The Best Vitamin Supplements When looking for a vitamin supplement, what is important is the quality of nutrition that you receive. Beyond the promises, the lab analyses, the price - is the bottom line: is your body getting what it needs, in a fo...
- Oils, Fats Causing Cancer, But Who's Hiding the Cures? The U.S. Government gives us the freedom to choose to use an addictive drug that will increase our likelihood of getting cancer by up to 90%. Yet we are not allowed to choose to cure ourselves with the many treatment...
- The Importance of Vitamin A Vitamin A deficiency is the leading cause of blindness. There are many health problems that can result if an individual does not consume enough vitamin A in their diet.
- Diet Against Cancer
- The Power of Vitamin E
- Health Benefits of Vitamin D
- Getting the Right Amount of Vitamin D
- New Study Finds that Many Healthy Children Have Low Vitamin D Levels
- Multiple Sclerosis, Vitamin D, and Autoimmune Disorders
- Can Apples Reduce the Risk of Cancer?
|
|