A few days ago this annoyance resurfaced during a visit to Borders. I had been looking through the political section for a book I might find interested in. I soon realized that I would have trouble just finding anything written by a conservative. In the end I had found only about five or six books that I was quite sure were written by conservatives. On the other hand I managed to find at least a dozen books which could not have been written by anyone but a liberal. However, this wasn't what got to me. The real hornets were the titles. Nearly all of the books that were obviously liberal made obvious and arrogantly outright accusations that conservatives are facsists, that we are racist, that Christianity is hopelessly Medieval, or that we are just plain stupid. On the other hand, the most offensive title among the conservative books was Godless:The Church of Liberalism, a book I chose not to buy firstly because it was written by Anne Coulter and secondly because if I really had an doubts, I could just glance at the more Left-wing literature.
My problem with this wasn't so much that these writers were so openly intolerant (yes that's right, I called the "Progressives" intolerant) or insulting toward the conservative veiwpoint, but rather that such attitudes are so widely accepted and supported in mainstream liberalism. If anyone reading this doubts me just visit the aticles of a few of AC's leftist demagogues. Even in the comics, I find a strong liberal bias and arrogance with a total of one regularly political strip, two occasionally political strips, and not a single ounce of conservativism in either of them.
To any liberals reading this: liste carefully. Being black does not make make someone automatically innocent or deserving of special treatment, it just makes them black, the government that governs best governs least and if you feel otherwise you can take it up with Abraham Lincoln, terrorists and foreign dictaors do not deserve to be sympathized with simply by virtue of not being Americans, there is no constitutiona right to not be offended, and when someone stands up in front of a bunch of liberal reporters and calls Bush a nazi they are not being brave or courageous, they're either being lemming or careerists.
I suppose I'm now marked as a racist or some other awful creature. Whatever I am I'm clearly not capable of the same level of thought and emotion as one of those great revolutionary thinkers that inhabit the Left. Clearly, I am a pathetically inhuman cretin who can not even begin to comprehend the value of diversity, the need to understand our enemies, or the suppression of the Left.
Have you noticed how I never onc called liberals socialists or communists even though the Right wing is almost synonymous with facsism in the dictionary of the Left? Have you noticed how frequently liberals call conservatives nazis, bigots, and racists? Have you ever noticed that Bush never once even told the NAACP or any other representatives of the Black community that they need to start taking some responsibility for their own problems, something Bill Cosby has already said. Have ever noticed ow under a nazi those organization probably wouldn't exist anyway? Maybe I'm overreacting (in which case I should probably start calling liberals filthy commies) but it seems to me that when you call someone a nazi, you'd better have a damn good reason. Maybe its just me, but it seems throwing such a term around so casually is an insult to everyone who ever had to even see a concentration camp. Oh yeah, in Germany calling someone a nazi is considered so serious and so insulting that its illegal. I guess its not just me.
I don't suppose it ever occurred to the geniuses of the Left that holding a different opinion was anything but a mark of stupidity. I don't suppose it ever occured to them that they are easily as rigid and exclusive as the Right was in regards to their tolerance of ideological dissidents. I don't suppose it ever occurred to them that some us are pushed so far that we will eventually go on angry rants like this? No, I guess not.
Published by Brett Davison
My name is Brett and I was born on October 12, 1991. I'm a Christian, a history geek, a philosopher, an otaku, and a writer. View profile
- FCC, Media Ownership, and Deregulation: Is There a Liberal Bias?This paper will focus on the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC's) proposed deregulation policy for media ownership.
- Does the Media Have a Liberal Bias?This examines the question from both points of view, than I state my opinion on the topic
- Are You Boring?A mini-rant on boring people who are also rude and bad conversationalists. Unfortunately, I don't cover anything about what to do about it, because I prefer to whine instead of provide solutions. Providing solutions...
- Liberal Bias is Alive & Well!Reading the comments on an article of a Lefty pal of mine got me to thinking...
- The Slight Liberal Bias of Slate MagazineThe online magazine, Slate, is colored by a slight liberal bias.
- How Are Liberals Really Different from Conservatives?
- Terrorism and Iraq: The Connection Neither Liberals nor Conservatives Want to Talk...
- Liberal Bias in Our Schools
- The Liberal Bias of the Dictionary
- There is Evidence that Mainstream Television Journalism Does Not Have a Liberal Bias
- Shedding Light on "Liberal Bias" in the Media
- MSNBC "Oh God!" Gaffe and Liberal Bias in the Media

4 Comments
Post a Commentgood for you Brett,it's about time. 5 stars
Rant on Brother, rant on!
Glad I stopped by as I'm still not getting alerts to your articles. A very good piece, Brett. RJT has proved in her past articles and comments a clear "bias" against America, Israel, and anything that successfully furthers Freedom. I just thank God she can't vote here.
Come on, when was the last time anyone in the media really asked Obama any of the real questions? If that's what you really think then try reading "Bias" a book written by former liberal Bernard Goldberg WHILE HE WAS STILL A REPORTER FOR CBS NEWS!