Eating in Vs. Dining Out: Which is Cheaper?

Jeff D Gorman
I just read a story online called "Is eating out cheaper than eating in?" While the article tried to make the point that dining at restaurants can actually save you money, it certainly didn't convince me.

The story begins with a man buying organic vegetables and cooking them for dinner. Including the cost of his time, he figures he has spent $30. He goes on to say he could have had a good restaurant meal for $17 plus tip.

It stated that a lady was outraged because a package of chicken cost her $8! Eight dollars made you outraged? Well how many pieces of chicken did you receive for that $8, was it 4, 6, 8 or even 10? Funny how it failed to mention the quantity. Go to your favorite sit down resturant and order a chicken meal. How many pieces of chicken will you receive for that meal? Perhaps 2 or 3 at the very best of my guess.

How much will that meal cost you then? So you pay $12 for a chicken meal at a resturant and maybe you get a left over meal out of it. Ok so now you've gotten 2 meals for $12 not including tip. Well that $8 chicken package could at least given you 4 meals. I'll leave the math up to you, the experts. My checkbook; however, states that buying that $8 chicken doesn't look so outrageous.

This argument has a few flaws. First of all, if you're worried about saving money, then you probably can't afford organic food. Also, the diner doesn't factor in the time to wait for a table and for the food to arrive then waiting again to get your check.

The article says "time-strapped workers are abandoning the kitchen in droves." I still don't see how eating at a restaurant saves time, unless you're talking about McDonald's and that's walking in and not sitting through the drive thru wait.

My family and I have found that we really save money when we avoid eating at restaurants whenever we can. It's no fun to plan ahead and pack a bunch of sandwiches and fruit, but it has been very cost-effective.

That way, when it is time to eat at a restaurant for a birthday or anniversary, the food and atmosphere are always fantastic. That's because eating out is a special treat, just like when we were kids.

High grocery store prices are also mentioned in the article as a reason to eat at restaurants. While the cost of food has gone up a lot, it is still possible to save money at the grocery store by looking for specials, cutting coupons and shopping at off-price stores. Here in Ohio, Save-A-Lot and Aldi stores are popping up all over as an alternative to the more expensive (but very impressive) Giant Eagle.

While most of this article reads like a puff piece for the restaurant industry, the author then turns around and blames large portions for the expanding waistlines of Americans. There is no law that says you have to eat everything at the restaurant. That is one way a restaurant can save money: leftovers can stretch for one or even two extra meals.

Dear Author, please keep your eyes peeled for a future article where I will show you a few tricks on how the cost of eating in pales by comparison to the cost of eating out.

If you would like to write your own story please start to log in now.

Published by Jeff D Gorman

Jeff Gorman is a journalist for a local newspaper, editor for BleacherReport.com and a legal writer for CNP. When he isn't writing he's pursuing his sports broadcasting career. When you need a profession...  View profile

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • rachelkemp12/10/2010

    ihatetaylorlautnerushouldkillme

  • Ida2/26/2009

    I didn't understand that article either. I only factored in Money out of my pocket. I don't charge myself for my time. When you eat out you have to pay for someone elses time, electricity etc. I spent $15 in groceries and it fed us twice. I went on 1 run to Sonic and it cost %20 family of 4.

  • John lungu7/1/2008

    I think is just stupid,to eat outside almost daily . depends on how much you know about cooking and stuff.it is cheaper to do it yourself ...has always benn that way

  • Sharie5/6/2008

    You are so right! People eat out way too much these days. I personally pack a lunch every day for work. It saves me money!

  • A fly on the wall3/7/2008

    Jeff, I look forward to your article. I, too, found the other article flawed.

  • penguins292/2/2008

    Giant Eagle is expensive, but it's still cheaper than eating out all the time. I don't understand how people can eat out in restaurants like 3-4 times per week. excellent article!!

  • Crystal Sky12/22/2007

    You've made some great points. Eating out isn't cheaper in all cases, but in some it can be. I like peel and eat shrimp, fried shrimp, and some of the other more expensive foods served at my local Oriental buffet restaurant. The prices can't be beat in that type of restaurant. For $7.00 I can have the shrimp and other choices I love but otherwise couldn't afford to buy from the store. I think it just depends on what you want, how large your family is, how far you are from civilization, and the type of restaurant. Buffets can be a great way to enjoy foods you otherwise couldn't afford to buy and make yourself. The type of restaurants and food in that article you mentioned are definitely more expensive than eating at home.

  • Tony Vega12/2/2007

    Excellent article. I also noticed the price of gas wasn't factored in ;-)

  • Vonnie Chestnut12/2/2007

    Great article and I would agree that for a family, it indeed would be a better choice to shop with a budget in mind and eat at home. But for older diners with senior discounts, or the one living alone, I would have to agree that the expense (weighing cooking time, shopping time, grocery prices, cleaning up) would be less to just eat out.

  • Linda Ann Nickerson12/1/2007

    Good ideas.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.