Senator Hatch attacked Kagan for her stance on abortion. In particular, according to KDKA.com, he asked about a note she wrote when she was a domestic aid to Clinton that said it would be "a disaster" if the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a statement that said there was no case in which partial-birth abortions would be deemed necessary. Kagan clarified the note by saying the disaster in question would have been if the organization's statement didn't fully explain that, in some instances, the partial birth abortion procedure was "medically best".
Later, Senator Graham tried to say that she tried to promote her own agenda with the issue by allowing the broadest possible practices of the procedure.
"It's not true. I had no agenda with respect to this issue," was her response.
Senator Coburn attacked Kagan with her stance on gun control. Talking about the most recent court ruling about an individual's right to possess firearms, Kagan accepted the ruling. However, she wouldn't say whether she believed it was a "fundamental right" to bear arms. This led Coburn to ask Kagan if she believed in the unalienable rights provided for in the Declaration of Independence.
"You should not want me to act in any way on the basis of such a belief", Kagan stated, according to KDKA.com. By this, she meant that, as a member of the Supreme Court, she should not be expected to act outside the Constitution and its laws, a way one would try to promote their own agenda. Rather, she continued, "you should want me to act on the basis of law."
Kagan's careful side-stepping of Republican attacks in day two has shown the power of her verbal mastery. Republicans may feel that she is going to be another liberal, trying to push the dreaded "liberal agenda," but, due to her phraseology and thoughtfulness, Kagan has not given them any extra ammunition.
This was evident with Senator Cornyn's agreement with Senator Leahy, stating that Kagan will be confirmed. Although the hearings continue tomorrow, Kagan will not be present. Former colleagues will be interviewed, and, if they are as skillful as her during their questioning, there will soon be three females seated on the highest bench in the land.
Published by Bob McCoog
I've lived in Texas now for about seven years. However, I am a Yankee by birth from the great state of New Jersey. View profile
- SCOTUS Blog Offers Real-Time Updates on Kagan Confirmation Hearings (Link)If you want to keep up on this week's Supreme Court confirmation hearings of prospective Justice Elena Kagan, the SCOTUS blog is a great way to do it. Read more here...
Elena Kagan Through the Looking Glass: Supreme Court Hearings Resemble "...Elena Kagan's Supreme Court confirmation process resembles something out of "Alice in Wonderland" as the truth is evaded or turned on its head.- Elena Kagan Hearing, Day One: Why Americans Are Tuning OutSolicitor General Elena Kagan, all but certain to be the next justice of the United States Supreme Court, was just a prop in a royal blue jacket Monday afternoon as her confirmation hearing began before the Senate Jud...
- Leon Panetta Senate Confirmation Hearings for CIA ChiefThe rules of cabinet confirmation hearings seems to be that, if you're of the same political party as the candidate, ask the easy questions and quietly applaud each answer
- Elena Kagan Senate Confirmation Hearings Set for June 28Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, powerful Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, believes the U.S. government should sanction same-sex marriages. He wants Congress to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.
- Elena Kagan Confirmation Hearings: Day 2
- Kagan Faces Tough Opposition in Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings
- Elena Kagan Confirmation Hearings: Day 1
- Kagan Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing: A 'Vapid and Hollow Charade'
- Can U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan Stand by Her Principles on June 28?
- Questions for Elena Kagan, Supreme Court Nominee
- Barack Obama Appoints First Gay to Supreme Court in Elena Kagan, or Has He?
