After five and a half years in office, President George W. Bush looked prepared to follow John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, and James Garfield as the only U.S. Presidents to serve without issuing a single veto. Although Harrison died after a month in office and Garfield's tenure was significantly cut short by an assassin, leaving them without adequate time to prove their veto capabilities. That mark of history came to an end yesterday as the President vetoed the controversial bill to fund embryonic stem cell research. It took President Bush 2005 days to issue the first veto of his two terms. The House of Representatives also failed to override the Commander-in-Chief's veto, falling 51 votes short of a two-thirds majority.
This course of events does not mean that the debate or the process to fund such research is dead. There was much dissention from powerful politicians within the President's own party. There are other bills for stem cell research without embryos pending in the House and Senate. Those bills are considered more likely to pass muster with the Bush administration.
Looking back on presidential vetoes, Bush is still an anomaly of the past 100 years. Garfield was the last President to not issue a veto, and that was in 1881. No President of the 20th century avoided wielding the power for long. Bill Clinton managed to survive his first two years in office without issuing a veto, but came to issue 37 in the subsequent six years.
Only two Presidents in history even had the majority of their vetoes overridden by Congress (Andrew Johnson and Franklin Pierce), and neither of them served in past 100 years. Even Gerald Ford, the only President to never be elected, used his veto power 66 times in his short tenure of office.
Of course, some Presidents have used the power of veto more than others. Franklin Roosevelt enjoyed its power a total of 635 times and was only denied nine times. In nonconsecutive years, Grover Cleveland said no 584 times with only seven Congressional denials. Even Ulysses Grant, who never wanted to be President, vetoed 93 bills. And the President's own father wielded his power 44 times in four years.
With mid-term elections looming, President Bush's tendency of vetolessness may come to an end soon. There is no telling which party will hold the majority in the House or Senate, and what reaction those representatives will have toward the administrations policies. The public must wait and see if this first veto is a glimpse of what's to come or just a passing fancy.
Published by Matthew Lubin
Writer/editor and academic writing professor. Lived in southern China from 2005 to 2009. My work has appeared in Shenzhen Daily, Asia's Best Hotels & Resorts, The Aroostook Review, American Drivel Review, an... View profile
New York Permits Purchase of Eggs from Women for Stem Cell ResearchEthical controversy heats up over New York's decision to publicly fund the purchase of eggs from women for stem cell research after attempting to recruit women to donate eggs fo...
New Stem Cell Research Advancements: The Dream of Christopher Reeve Grow...The late actor Christopher Reeve was a tireless advocate of stem cell research in the last decade of his life. The results of a new study our of John's Hopkins Medical School ma...
Stem Cell Research UtopiaStem cell research has been highly hindered by the recent Bush administration. There are effects taking place that are limiting American scientists from performing at their max...- In Favor of Stem Cell ResearchConservatives argue that stem cell research is immoral. They argue that embryos are "killed" in the process. But, does stem cell research really "tale" a life? Or would restricting such research do more harm?
- Missouri Voters to Decide Stem-cell Research FutureVoters in Missouri will comment on a national issue November 7 when they are asked to amend their state constitution to specifically allow and define the conditions for stem cell research.
- Bush Issues First Ever Veto, to the Disappointment of Stem Cell Research Advocates
- Social Security Reform - President Bush: Redistribute If You Want to Privatize!
- Why President Bush Failed
- Personal Stories About President Bush
- Someone Stop the President...Please
- Stem Cell Research: The Key to Saving Lives
- Adult Stem Cell Research Leads to a Method to Replace Damaged Heart Tissue
- Only seven Presidents served without issuing a veto.
- This was the first veto in more than five and a half years.
- What will happen after mid-term elections?

4 Comments
Post a CommentNot to mention the fact that the bill he chose to veto is the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005. Bipartisan support for the bill and overwhelming public support for increased funding for embryonic stem cell research funding is not enough. Gee-Dub surrounded himself with adopted children born from frozen embryos and made his veto into a telepic. TV? Okay. Governance? Don't get me started.
John Dean, he of the Watergate scandal, has written an interesting article. Basically, what the signing statements have allowed Bush to do is provide a legal foundation for ignoring parts of legistlation he disagrees with. Just one example: On four occasions, Bush went ahead and signed legislation outlawing the use of US troops for combat in Colombia. Afterwards, Bush issued signing statements that said he had the power as President to ignore those laws. So basically these things let him have it both ways: He can appear to be supporting a law in public, while ignoring in private. That's better than a veto, wouldn't you say?
Timothy, it's been more of a negotiation tactic to threaten a veto with the Bush administration. Some critics say it has shown power for the President while others claim that it lessens the effects of a veto. It's because of the varying perceptions that I left it out. I also didn't find any information about this tactic with any former President to compare it with. I would appreciate anyone writing about this tactic from an historical perspective. It is a very interesting subject.
The fact is that Pres. Bush has been secretly "vetoing" legislation since he took office. He has issues over 500 "signing statement" which goes into the federal registrar as an executive decision to overlook or ignore any parts of Congressional legislation he so desires. In effect, he has taken advantage of a little known loophole in the so-called checks and balances system. He has effectively turned Congress into a mere Presidential advisory commission.