Engineering Catastrophe

Geo-Engineering, or the artificial creation of weather and weather patterns is in everyone´s minds nowadays. In recent years, the topic spurred controversy after it was discovered that government agencies and think-tanks have studied and continue to study the implementation of weather modification techniques to, they say, ´curb´ global warming and other atmospheric ´diseases´. The ways in which this modification would come to past are abundant, but the use of CHEM-TRAILS seems to be the one method scientists are spending more time on. As it happened with other artificially engineered products, such as GMO foods, most of us were ignorant about the issue, and it took the alternative media a great effort to make it a main stream one.

Geo-engineering of course would not be only a matter of changing the weather, or the climate, but it would implicate whole environmental changes. A way in which scientists would like to sort of control our weather -they already try- is by spraying the stratosphere with sulfur, barium, aluminum oxides and other particles contained in aerosols. The first direct consequence of this spraying has been a multiplicity of health complications on the populations such as neurological effects and behavioral changes, disturbance of blood circulation, heart damage, effects on eyes and eyesight, reproductive failure, damage to immune systems, stomach and gastrointestinal disorder, damage to liver and kidney functions, hearing defects, disturbance of the hormonal metabolism, dermatological effects, suffocation and lung embolism. How do we know this? Tests performed on people who suffer any or several of these complications show high levels of one or more of the chemicalssprayed over population centers. In other tests, air samples also show high concentrations of barium and aluminum.

"I suggest that both the sulfur dioxide and the silica particles could be delivered into the stratosphere by dissolving an additive in jet aviation fuel," writes engineer John Gorman, who has conducted experiments to test the feasibility of such a scenario. "We would want to burn fuel containing the additive specifically when the aircraft was cruising in the lower stratosphere," he adds. Reports of chemicaltrailsover hundreds of cities in countries around the world are common now. Thick plumes of smoke paint blue skies in grey after what seem to be commercial and private plane fly bys releasing the particles. Who do those airplanes belong to? Government sponsored agencies or institutions such as the US Airforce.

With all the negative effects chem-trails have had over populations, many scientists have made pronouncements about the dangers this kind of Geo-engineering poses to the environment and the people. Dan Schrag, from Harvard University warns that any intent to change the environment, including the ecosystem itself could have disastrous consequences; among them, drought and famine. "I think we should consider climate engineering only as an emergency response to a climate crisis, but I question whether we're already experiencing a climate crisis," Schrag said. Alan Robock, professor at Rutgers University says that the consequences could go much further than drought. These experiments, he says "could create disasters," damaging the ozone layer and potentially altering the stratosphere by eliminating weather patterns such as the annual Asian monsoon rain season, which 2 billion people rely upon to water their crops and feed the population". The problem is that this is exactly what the use of chem-trails intends to do: to change weather patterns. A massive use of chemicals to block the sun´s rays would entail drastic changes in the biosphere and the atmosphere such as the hydrologic cycle. Wind patterns would change as the sun is the one element that drives winds around the planet, and with this other aspects such as soil fertility and water availability start to surface.

Do not let chem-trails be confused with contrails. While contrails disappear after a few minutes in the sky, chem-trails are left by planes cris-crossing the sky multiple times producing tic-tac-toe figures all over the sprayed area. Although government agencies and ill-informed environmental groups blame humans for global warming, the use of chem-trails is intended to limit the amount of sunlight; a totally different issue. If humans are responsible for global warming, why block the sun? The truth is that it is the sun as the most gigantic hot body in the solar system the one driving the weather. By different calculations, human activity emits only between 4 and 6 percent of the total of CO2 into the atmosphere, therefore, having little influence on weather patterns. Massive super volcano eruptions and the sun, for example, have a greater effect. But even if the emission of CO2 was a worrisome issue, is it not true that plants and trees use CO2 as their life element? CO2 is indeed what most of the biosphere feeds from. A CO2 rich environment then should provide more fuel for plants and trees to grow and provide more food to animals and humans.

Another consequence of chem-trailing the stratosphere is acid rain. The drop of sulfur containing rain would cause massive acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. But not only those who reject the theory of man-made global warming are skeptics about using chem-trails. The chief scientist of Greenpeace for the UK, Doug Parr, an advocate of the man-made global warming explanation disqualified attempts to Geo-engineer the planet as "outlandish" and "dangerous". A KSLA news reportaired earlier this year found that aerosol chemical testing has been going on for at decades and cited unclassified tests exposed in 1977 Senate hearings. The report showed experiments with biochemical compounds on the public. KSLA reports that "239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.

If the ultimate goal Geo-engineering has is to reduce the effects of global warming due to human activity and its consequent green house gas emissions, one would think it would at least have a chance to work, right? Well, it just happens Geo-engineering with chem-trails does nothing when it comes to stopping the amount of green house gases in the atmosphere; it does nothing to reduce green house gas concentrations. Therefore, chem-trailing is at the very least an incomplete solution and at the most a massive poisoning of humansand fertile lands.

At the end of all this there is a more worrisome aspect of geo-engineering. Weaponization. We all know what governments are capable of when they want to manipulate the people´s views of the world: unexplained wars, inexistent pandemics, fictitious boogie-men, false flag terror... Although weaponization of chemicals is generally seen as morally and universally prohibited, we have seen very convincing evidence that such prohibition is not always respected. Chem-trails are already, as far as I am concerned, a weapon of mass destruction. According to an article on Wired Magazine, other forms of Geo-engineering such as Ocean Fertilization can be used to overproduce algae blooms to sterilize oceans, this would in turn destroy fisheries and water ecosystems. The proposed movement of large amounts of water from the bottom of the oceans to the surface would be useful in changing the trajectories of hurricanes as the storms follow paths over warm waters where they find the fuel to grow and move.

So why would we adopt a weather modification technique that is harmful to humans and whose main goal cannot be achieved? What would geo-engineering with chemtrails or ocean fertilization be used for if not for weather modification? Who benefits if these kinds of geo-engineering technologies are adopted for other reasons? It will certainly not be the environment. More answers on chemtrails, its origins and what they mean can be found on Jim Phelps´ The Science of "Air Pharmacology" or "Chemtrails".