Environmental Groups Petition EPA to Regulate Pollution from Ships

Regina Sass
A petition has been filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asking the agency to set rules regarding pollution that comes from the large ocean going ships, both cargo and cruise ships. The petition is a joint effort of several environmental groups, namely Oceana, Friends of the Earth and the Center for Biological Diversity and it was filed in their names by Earthjustice, the leading U.S. public interest environmental law firm.

An additional petition has also been filed by the Attorney General of California, Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, Jr. also fi to U.S. EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson on behalf of the state of California today.

They require the EPA to assess how the ships are contributing to global warming as well as to seek public comment and then make rules for the purpose of reducing the pollution, or if that cannot be done, to explain why they either cannot or will not comply.

A decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that has handed down in April of this year says that the Clean Air Act gives the authority to address global warming to the EPA.

The petitions that have just been filed are just the beginning of the process of imposing mandatory regulation on the marine transportation industry. They ask the EPA to respond back within 180 days.

While the shipping industry is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions - world wide they are responsible for 3% of the carbon dioxide, which is the same amount as the whole country of Canada - as well as nitrous oxide and black carbon, ships are not regulated by the United States government nor are their emissions limited under the Kyoto Protocol or any other international agreements that address the issue of global warming.

Some of the suggestions from the groups include slower speeds, cleaner fuels and better ships.

The petition is specifically asking the Environmental Protection Agency to:

Require marine vessels to increase their fuel efficiency, which would result in lower levels of carbon dioxide and other pollutants and to require then to use cleaner fuels, which would lessen the emissions of black soot.

They want new regulations to be extended to all marine cargo vessels that operate in U.S. waters, no matter what country they are registered in, so that ships that are registered in the United States are not put at any disadvantage.

Source; Earthjustice http://www.earthjustice.org

Published by Regina Sass

I have been writing, editing and doing advertising online for 10 years. I have been a gardener for more than 50 years. I am a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Meeps10/5/2007

    Could you not put a carbon catching filter on the tailpipe of the ship? Don't we know how to sequester pollutants? We can keep the same technology we just need to close out the exits by which pollutants escape? no?

  • Kyle10/4/2007

    This is a perfect example of why non-technical politicians should seek technical advice or educate themselves before tackling technical issues. Or perhaps he did, but is relying on the FACT that most people are techical illiterates and the MSM won't allow facts to intrude in a way that is contrary to their bias.

    Here are all of the ways that you can't reduce CO2 from ships:

    Increase fuel eff. - already at the state of the art.
    Change fuels - all practical fuels essentially the same.
    Go electric - weight and eff. losses increase CO2!
    Go nuclear - yeah, sure.
    Slow down - time is money. 99.9% of the trip is in international waters. Who enforces? The UN. LOL

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.