An additional petition has also been filed by the Attorney General of California, Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, Jr. also fi to U.S. EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson on behalf of the state of California today.
They require the EPA to assess how the ships are contributing to global warming as well as to seek public comment and then make rules for the purpose of reducing the pollution, or if that cannot be done, to explain why they either cannot or will not comply.
A decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that has handed down in April of this year says that the Clean Air Act gives the authority to address global warming to the EPA.
The petitions that have just been filed are just the beginning of the process of imposing mandatory regulation on the marine transportation industry. They ask the EPA to respond back within 180 days.
While the shipping industry is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions - world wide they are responsible for 3% of the carbon dioxide, which is the same amount as the whole country of Canada - as well as nitrous oxide and black carbon, ships are not regulated by the United States government nor are their emissions limited under the Kyoto Protocol or any other international agreements that address the issue of global warming.
Some of the suggestions from the groups include slower speeds, cleaner fuels and better ships.
The petition is specifically asking the Environmental Protection Agency to:
Require marine vessels to increase their fuel efficiency, which would result in lower levels of carbon dioxide and other pollutants and to require then to use cleaner fuels, which would lessen the emissions of black soot.
They want new regulations to be extended to all marine cargo vessels that operate in U.S. waters, no matter what country they are registered in, so that ships that are registered in the United States are not put at any disadvantage.
Source; Earthjustice http://www.earthjustice.org
Published by Regina Sass
I have been writing, editing and doing advertising online for 10 years. I have been a gardener for more than 50 years. I am a member of the Society of Professional Journalists. View profile
- Careers for Graduates with a Degree in Environmental StudiesA degree in Environmental Studies reflects interdisciplinary undergraduate work that qualifies graduates for jobs in a wide variety of areas. Generally work involves problem solving and compromises between the needs...
- Environmental Hazards of Sprawl. Urban sprawl creates many problems for both wildlife and plant life and destroys vital natural resources needed for the survival of all.
- Green Groups Sue EPA Over Ship PollutionFriends of the Earth sued the U.S. EPA in federal court today for failing to meet an April 2007 deadline for setting emissions standards for large cargo and cruise ships.
Groups Seek 'Endangered' Status for LoggerheadsThe Center for Biological Diversity and Oceana have filed a petition asking federal officials to boost protection for the western North Atlantic loggerhead sea turtle from "thre...- Cloth or Disposable Diapers: Which is the Better Environmental Choice?Many people don't consider diapers to be a debate at all. For people debating between cloth and disposables, the data can be overwhelming . A survey of the literature on diapering choices exposes two very different in...
- Environmental Groups Can Join Death Valley Lawsuit
- Environmental Groups Decry Proposed Mining Revisions
- Environmental Groups Urge EPA to Stop the Building of Coal Fired Power Plant
- Groups Target Organic Fish Standards
- That's so Raven Doesn't Take Animal Rights and Environmental Issues Seriously
- Greenpeace and the Environmental Movement
- Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups in Congress


2 Comments
Post a CommentCould you not put a carbon catching filter on the tailpipe of the ship? Don't we know how to sequester pollutants? We can keep the same technology we just need to close out the exits by which pollutants escape? no?
This is a perfect example of why non-technical politicians should seek technical advice or educate themselves before tackling technical issues. Or perhaps he did, but is relying on the FACT that most people are techical illiterates and the MSM won't allow facts to intrude in a way that is contrary to their bias.
Here are all of the ways that you can't reduce CO2 from ships:
Increase fuel eff. - already at the state of the art.
Change fuels - all practical fuels essentially the same.
Go electric - weight and eff. losses increase CO2!
Go nuclear - yeah, sure.
Slow down - time is money. 99.9% of the trip is in international waters. Who enforces? The UN. LOL