EPA CO2 Emissions Ruling for Coal-Fired Plants Puts Clean Coal on the Fast Track
Clean Coal Technology Stonewalling Ends, America's Coal Future Brightens
What the New EPA CO2 Emissions Ruling Means
In order for a new coal-fired power plant to win approval, several things will need to happen. The EPA will need to develop specific rules about the acceptable limits for CO2 emissions, technology for reducing CO2 emissions to those levels must be identified or developed, and the proposed new plants will need to incorporate that best available technology to reduce CO2 emissions. It is thought that such a plan would involve the capture and storage of CO2, perhaps sequestering it underground where it would not contribute to global warming. With the current cost of alternative forms of energy, there is a strong incentive for power generators to solve these problems and develop the technologies that will restore coal, specifically clean coal, as the clear favorite energy source, not only of America, but of the world. In any case, it is now highly unlikely that any new permits could be issued before the incoming Obama administration takes control of the White House and environmental policy.
EPA CO2 Ruling is a Victory for American Business
Instead of ignoring the CO2 problem and helping power generators to ignore the pent up latent demand for clean coal technologies, the new ruling gives American entrepreneurs, be they big or small, a swift kick in the right direction. Since this country was founded, American ingenuity has been the strength and engine of our economy. We have never moved ahead by stonewalling innovation. The EPA CO2 ruling gives America the opportunity and incentive to become the world leader in the development of clean coal and carbon sequestration technologies. These are going to be huge growth industries over the next decades. America can and should be developing these technologies not only for our own next generation coal-fired power plants, but for the rest of the world as well.
Clearing the Road to America's Future
Coal-fired power plants are dramatically cheaper than nuclear power plants. By making these coal-fired power plants clean and removing the objection of unrestrained CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, the road can be cleared for the next step in reducing our dependence upon foreign oil. With abundant coal-fired power, we would have a cost-effective and American fuel source for our next generation of electric cars that will also help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Currently coal-fired power plants are responsible for about 30% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced in the United States each year according to a report in Time magazine.
Sources:
greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/epa-decision-signals-trouble-for-coal/
news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=AP&date=20081114&id=9381118
time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1859049,00.html?imw=Y
Published by Brad Sylvester - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle
Brad spent 18 years in the consumer electronics industry, including more than ten years in new product development. He now writes full time from his home in the mountains of New Hampshire. View profile
Coal Waste: Death for You & Your Children?While the use of coal smokestack scrubbers does significantly reduce airborne pollution, it is merely a trade of one evil for another. Read on to learn why. - The CO2 FallacyThis is an objective essay meant to be used as a way to educate readers on certain aspects of the issue of global warming that are imperative to know, yet are often never mentioned.
- Nuclear Energy: Contrasting Points of ViewThere are pros and cons for the use the nuclear energy as a solution to meeting the increasing need of humanity for energy.
- World's 1st Pilot Coal Fired Plant for CO2 Capture and StorageGlobal warming and carbon footprint! The debate still rages but capturing Carbon Dioxide from burning coal has huge benefits to your personal budget.
Converting CO2 Emissions into FuelModern research has awakened an older idea of converting CO2 into a renewable fuel. In the past the idea was disregarded for not being an environmentally friendly process, but C...
- Hot Hype and Hyperbole Are Killing the 'Good' Name of Science
- A Letter To..
- Coal: Clean Energy or Silent Killer?
- Texas Governor Pushing for More Coal-Fired Power Plants
- Carbon Dioxide Emissions Are Only Part of the Story
- Vermont Court Backs State Efforts to Regulate Emissions
- Innovation Could Feed CO2 to Algae Plants
- EPA Environmental Appeals Board CO2 emissions ruling puts coal-fired power plant permits on hold.
- Coal-fired power plants produce about 30% of America's greenhouse gas emissions.
- By regulating CO2, clean-coal technolgy becomes a priority and an opportunity for American business.





9 Comments
Post a CommentTo capture the carbon emissions and store them back to the underground there will is a technology called "Clean Coal Technology".
The banking giant now plans to invest more money in the unproven 'Clean Coal' technology of carbon capture and storage. So while this represents great progress in eliminating support for environmentally destructive practices, the coal industry is continuing to get off scot-free.Improving the efficiency of boilers used in coal-fired power stations reduces carbon dioxide emissions because less coal is needed to generate the heat energy that turns the steam turbines powering the electricity generators.
Follow the Link:lincenergy.us/
=)
Although the new ruling puts a temporary halt to the construction of new coal-fired power plants, until the proper rules and carbon-sequestering technologies can be developed, it does not reduce the current demand for coal by a single lump.
Clean coal i.e with carbon capture and storage, cannot work on the required scale because of the extra energy demands and lack of safe but gargantuan storage spaces. Add to that the coal price doubling every 18 months or so.
Follow the Link:lincenergy.us/
Another good article. I agree with environment-friendly use of coal, but as well as funding innovation for clean-coal as a short term solution, the true long-term solution is working away from fossil fuel technologies as our primary source of energy. I'm talking between 30-50 years here, but we need to be working that direction.
Thank you for your submission. Your article has been featured on the front page of AC.
Please keep AC stocked with great front-page material.
If you read high-quality content you believe is worthy of the front page, let us know by using this forum thread:
http://forum.associatedcontent.com/forum.shtml?thread=25491
I hope the Obama administration suceeds in cleaning up coal so that we can reduce health problems related to their emissions while becoming more self reliant for energy. A win-win all the way around! If you would like more info about reducing chemical exposures in order to remain healthy, please visit me at www.holler4health.com.
Thanks for a great article!
Teresa
Nice article. Congratulations on being featured on the front page!
Good news.
This is good to know, Brad. As always, excellent work.