EPA Staff Report Calls for Stronger Lead Standards
Report Makes Recommendations for EPA Administrator
The "Final Staff Paper" released calls on the EPA administration to set the limits for lead emissions much lower than they currently are. Right now, the standard is set at 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter, and the report calls for that limit to be lowered considerably to a range of 0.2 to 0.05 micrograms per cubic meter. The paper also calls for the EPA to have only one lead standard, rather than the two standards that exist now. Furthermore, the paper also calls for the EPA to stop consideration of dropping lead from the list of pollutants it considers when assessing air quality.
The results and recommendations of the Final Staff Paper will not have any tangible effects on the current lead standards until at least next September. The lag time allows the EPA to further study the proposals and allow for a public comment period to address the new proposed limits.
The Final Staff Paper figured its recommendations on evidence of health concerns that arise from lead. The Paper points out that new studies and evidence shows that adverse affects to children are shown to be occurring at lower levels of lead in the blood system than what was determined in 1978 when the standards were originally set. The Paper also used evidence that lead exposure causes health problems for adults in determining the newly recommended limits.
Airborne lead does not only pose a danger through breathing, but also a danger of the lead particles settling in the environment as dust. So far, studies have not been able to determine if there is a "safe" limit of lead exposure for children. The ill effects of lead in children are most profound as lead affects development of the nervous system and contributes to a loss of IQ.
Lead is one of six "critera" pollutants the EPA considers in assessing air quality standards. The other pollutants are ozone, carbon monoxide, fine particulates, and nitrogen and sulfur oxides. As more and more evidence of health dangers from these pollutants come to light, the EPA is required to update and amend standards.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Published by alex cruden
What I am doing tonight? The same thing I do every night -- planning to take over the world. View profile
Citgo Found Guilty of Violating Clean Air ActCITGO petroleum found guilty of violations to clean air act. company operated faulty tanks, and used processes that emitted poisonous gases in to the air.- U.S. Government Reaches Clean Air Act Settlement with Electric Company The Eastern Kentucky Power Cooperative utility company has entered into a settlement with the United States Government concerning violations of the Clean Air Act
- Arkansas Clean Air ActClean Air Acts throughout the United States are acts or laws that ban smoking in certain locations or situations, and Arkansas' Clean Air Act is no different.
- Fight for Clean AirBreathing air in the Philippines six years after the implementation of Republic Act 8748, or the Philippine Clean Air Act.
Utah Indoor Clean Air ActUtah began its ban of smoking tobacco products and fighting against second-hand smoke in 1995, with its latest amendment in 2006. For more information on this smoke-free act, co...
- The Dangers of Lead Poisoning in Lead Crystal and How it Might Have Affected Royal...
- Toy Recalls and Lead Poisoning
- Lead: Toxic Metal and Its Effects to Society
- Profiting from High Gas Prices with Covered Calls: Stock Tips
- Outline for My Paper Regarding Bill Clinton and Ken Starr
- The Four Main Points of Clean Air Act of 1970
- The Stakes are High in the Clean Air Act Court Case
