Epistemology tends to question the very term knowledge. It asks questions like what is knowledge, how does one acquire knowledge, how does one know that what he knows is right, and what does one know? While these questions can be slightly confusing for common man, philosophers ponder these questions like anything and try to come up with answers in order to address issues in the universe philosophically.
There are two most important aspects of knowing something. Firstly, you know about a thing and secondly, you know how to do that thing. For example, there is a mathematical problem. You know the problem, you know the nature of the problem, and you know the outcome. But, knowing how to solve the problem to get the desired outcome is entirely different from knowing the problem and its outcome in the first place. This difference is mutually exclusive and is differentiated as knowledge-that and knowledge-how in epistemology.
To explain further, there is a simple problem like this. Three plus three equals six. You know it. You understand it. This is called knowledge-that. Now, in order to justify your belief that you know the problem and its outcome, you need to do it yourself. In other words, you should be able to add three plus three and come up with the answer six. This is called knowledge-how. Simply put, knowledge-that assumes that you know the problem and its solution while knowledge-how proves that you know the problem and its solution.
Also, epistemology states the difference between believing something and knowing something. This is in fact one of the most useful explanations upon which a lot of other things can be derived upon. You can believe something by all means. It doesn't need to be right or wrong. In other words, you can believe in something and it could be right or wrong. On the other hand, if you know something, it cannot be wrong, as knowledge is absolute while belief is not. You continue to believe in things only when you are not sure of them. The moment you are sure of something, in other words, the moment you know something, you stop believing it, as you know it.
A lot of philosophers like Plato, Simon Blackburn, Timothy Williamson, D.M. Armstrong, Alvin Goldman, Richard Kirkham, and Edmund Gettier have contributed to epistemology immensely. To date, epistemology continues to be one of the most genuine methods of thinking.
Published by Kay Kay
I love to eat, go out with friends, watch movies, and generally have fun. View profile
- Agnosticism. Or How Do We Know?There are those who would say we do not know something if we cannot answer any hypothetical possibility that could be raised. This, of course, excludes all areas of knowledge. We can doubt anything if we put our minds...
- My Philosophy of RhetoricThis article examines the relationship between rhetoric and gender.
- Why Intelligent Design is UnclearA brief discussion of Intelligent Design and why it does not just "leap out" of the evidence.
- Why "Jesus Saves" is Inadequate (and How to Fix It)A brief overview of the history of modern thought and its implications for the believer and non-believer alike.
The Nature of Reality and Appearance by Kant, Hegel and FichteA discussion of concepts and objects and the nature of being. Can we obtain a knowledge about truth in the world by reason alone?
- Epistemology in Philosophy and Science
- How Philosophy and Science Relate to Knowledge
- The Defining Features of Modern Philosophy
- Epistemology, Knowledge and Rational Belief: A Study
- A Primer in Knowledge Management
- Epistemology in Jean Luc Godard's Alphaville
- The Writing Process: How to Write a Novel

1 Comments
Post a CommentWow thanks for the learning tip today, great work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!