Facebook Breaches Privacy, Again

Shan-Lyn Forsythe
At the time when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was being named Time magazine's Person of the Year, beating the popular favorite, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, Facebook users have been sharing their unsettled and concerned opinions, often unfolding the thunder of their frustrations to that of an exasperated uproar. A quick visit into Facebook's Help directory is a telltale sign of unrest.

Yes, Facebook has breached its policy on privacy; again. And this may very well prove to be the last straw of toleration towards Facebook strategies that have toyed with many a user.

Over the years, Facebook has had issues in trying to keep the social network under tight reins with its privacy policy due to lawsuits. As of May 2010, their privacy act now reads 5,830 words long; words that might as well be thrown into the slush basket.

Facebook has been trying to gain popularity as one of the biggest social networks on the internet, and in order to do this, its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, realized that the user needed to trust the social networking site into believing privacy would not be violated. However, Zuckerberg definitely had a spade up his sleeve, very cleverly allowing 'privacy loopholes' upon its users, wanting their personal information made public over the last several years, believing that the market industry and developers would offer better products to the users if they were able to be reached.

Facebook is, indeed, a business, and it is baiting by endeavoring to make its social network more appealing, by playing with a double-edged sword.

It would appear the social network has very cleverly devised to continue leaking the private information of its users, whilst simultaneously seeking to assure its users that they now have better control over stricter privacy settings, which have supposedly been integrated in one of Facebook's recent updates. Needless to mention, the latter tactic is the bait.

So what is the last Facebook-user outcry? Apparently, Facebook wall comments appearing in a user's 'Recent Activity', can allow their diverse friends, and their friends of friends, to gain entry into another user's account, even if that user has set all their privacy controls to the strictest notch.

Yes, there's a breach. Perhaps minute to some, but nonetheless, another dip down the Facebook roller coaster ride with users feeling betrayed after Zuckerberg's announcement of late last year that a new interface would be implemented with greater privacy control.

However, after this new implementation in an attempt to pacify the angry mob, the most recent update has riled the natives up again. Facebook users have become more disgruntled being spammed with ads, having their privacy controls messed with, and not forgetting to mention tiptoeing delicately with what can be disclosed as opposed to what should never be exposed.

The Facebook social networking addiction is strong, and so people are shrugging their shoulders giving into the idea that total privacy is impossible, unless one abandons their Facebook account altogether. On the contrary, some users are even enjoying the exhibitionism, only influencing and attracting more users to become daringly bold. Definitely a hotbed for stalkers and predators searching for the large percentage of unsuspecting users who have come to believe that Facebook is now 'safe', since its last update. Wrongo in the congo.

There's a strange irony floating: it's not the Facebook user having any control; it's Facebook having control over the users.

The question that remains: are Facebook users willing to take the risk of having their privacy dissected? If the users are out for the 'business venture', by all means, Facebook is the place to be. For the users who believe that their private information will remain private, it would be wise to 'walk the Facebook Wall' carefully.

Sources:

Zuckerber Speaks ! New Privacy Settings Coming to Facebook (But no Rollbacks)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
Criticism of Facebook

Published by Shan-Lyn Forsythe

Shan-Lyn is a professional songwriter composer and musician. Her parallel passion is being a free-lance writer. She researches in alternative health sciences and 'green energy' ; and is also keen on home imp...  View profile

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Pete1/6/2011

    @angry user You have reason to be pissed off. Many people do. At least with Twitter the people know the liabilities of posting whatever they do, but with Facebook it's been one deception after another and yeah Zuckerberg is really out for the money but I wouldn't call him a genius on it or would have put him "person of the year"... what a disgrace to Time magazine.

  • Tim12/27/2010

    Facebook is going for the merchants but they need us little people to supply the merchants. No people, no business. I feel so tricked. Not anymore. This news story pins it.

  • angry user12/26/2010

    I'm pissed off! I just went to a friend's page, clicked on a comment she left on the page of someone I don't know and I could see that person's status, although not their whole page. I do NOT want people I don't know being able to see my photos, status, etc. Clear violation of privacy. Facebook sucks more every day.

  • Elena12/24/2010

    Facebook users are making one very young man rich by letting themselves be duped. If the privacy controls were stable I would probably bite but Zuckerberg can't be trusted.

  • Gregory M. Harshfield12/24/2010

    What is this face book of which you speak? (kidding) I had never been to the site, and with all the proliferation of that name everywhere I look I am now vowing to never visit it. Call me Scrooge, but the more powerful it gets, the less interested I am. I have a phone, a physical address and email. Y'all can call or write me anytime! And the only privacy leaking will be if I forget to close the blinds when I shower. Ew!

  • Shan-Lyn Forsythe12/23/2010

    Perhaps if Facebook wouldn't have set such high assertions that people would receive privacy, then maybe the users would have seen him coming from afar with his 'business card'. But you're quite right David, privacy cannot possibly exist unless one either doesn't join the network, or won't write on the 'wall'. I've never heard of a 'Facebook Recluse', lol. Perhaps it's human nature to want a bit of the stage, but even then, we'd like to believe that we can have access to a 'private stage'. ;)

  • David A. Reinstein, LCSW12/23/2010

    The expectation of privacy on a social networking site is a tad unrealistic... Many people are just now beginning to realize that.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.